Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library
For Librarians For Authors Editors About

Adaptation of the Vestibular System to Microgravity

Nancy G. Daunton

10.1002/cphy.cp040133

Source: Supplement 14: Handbook of Physiology, Environmental Physiology

Originally published: 1996

Published online: January 2011

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Overview of the Vestibular System
2 Adaptation in the Vestibular System
3 Functional Evidence of Adaptation to Microgravity
3.1 Control of Eye Movements
3.2 Control of Posture
3.3 Perception of Orientation and Motion
3.4 Space Motion Sickness
4 Physiological and Morphological Evidence of Adaptation
4.1 Peripheral Vestibular System
4.2 Central Nervous System
5 Summary and Conclusions
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of multisensory interactions in control of eye movements and posture, and perception of orientation and motion. These interactions provide the basis for sensory reweighting or substitution that underlies vestibular adaptation to altered gravity.

Adapted from Young et al. 116 with permission
Figure 2.

Representation of hypothetical time lines for stages of adaptation to altered gravity and read‐aptation to normal gravity. Readaptation to normal conditions is generally thought to occur more rapidly than adaptation to new conditions. Different rates of adaptation are found in different functional systems (for example, those involved with controlling gaze or posture, or with perceiving orientation). Rates are also affected by an individual's activity level in the new environment. In humans the initial phase of readaptation in some systems may be shortened to minutes by cognition.
Figure 3.

Gain of the horizontal vestibulo‐ocular reflex (HVOR) in two monkeys performing the gaze fixation task before and during spaceflight. Active eye and head movements were monitored as the animals acquired a visual target presented 40° to left or right of center. Note that the gain of the HVOR increased significantly during the first few days in space and then decreased during the last days of the flight. However, gain was still higher than preflight levels on the final flight day. Similar results have been found in cosmonauts performing the gaze fixation task in flight.

Adapted from Sirota et al. 93 with permission
Figure 4.

Gain of upward and downward vertical optokinetic reflexes (VOKR) obtained preflight, in flight, and postflight from one astronaut. Pattern velocity was 53°/s. Gain was calculated as the ratio of mean eye velocity to pattern velocity obtained 20-40 s after stimulus onset. Note the reversal of asymmetry (upward vs. downward) during the first 3 days in space and the return to normal asymmetry by the fourth in‐flight day.

Adapted from Clement et al. 13 with permission
Figure 5.

Normalized composite equilibrium data from 10 astronauts tested prior to flight and at various times after landing (wheels stop). Data were obtained using a dynamic posturography system. The composite score is a measure of anterior-posterior sway during tests involving perturbation of the posture platform under different conditions of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive input. All astronauts showed some degree of postural instability postflight, with four individuals having clinically abnormal scores on the first postflight test. The degree of instability and rate of return to normal differed greatly among the astronauts. (The preflight scale is in days, not hours.)

From Paloski et al. 81 with permission
Figure 6.

Mean amplitude of otolith‐spinal reflex EMG elicited by a 1G stimulus in astronauts tested preflight, inflight, and postflight. Data are normalized with respect to the last preflight test, noted by star. Error bars show ± 1 SE of mean where results were available for all four subjects. Note the large reduction in amplitude inflight (ranging from ∼25% on the first day to ∼75% on the 7th day), and the rapid return to normal amplitude on the first postflight test.

Adapted from Watt et al. 105 with permission
Figure 7.

Schematic representation of time course of space motion sickness symptoms. Points on the line indicate the most common symptom level found in 57 Shuttle astronauts at specific times in flight, and vertical striping represents the range of symptoms. (Observe that the time scale is logarithmic.) The time course indicated for space motion sickness is similar to that found under other chronic sickness‐inducing conditions, for example, sea voyages or wearing vision‐reversing prisms.

From Thornton et al. 95 with permission


Figure 1.

Schematic representation of multisensory interactions in control of eye movements and posture, and perception of orientation and motion. These interactions provide the basis for sensory reweighting or substitution that underlies vestibular adaptation to altered gravity.

Adapted from Young et al. 116 with permission


Figure 2.

Representation of hypothetical time lines for stages of adaptation to altered gravity and read‐aptation to normal gravity. Readaptation to normal conditions is generally thought to occur more rapidly than adaptation to new conditions. Different rates of adaptation are found in different functional systems (for example, those involved with controlling gaze or posture, or with perceiving orientation). Rates are also affected by an individual's activity level in the new environment. In humans the initial phase of readaptation in some systems may be shortened to minutes by cognition.



Figure 3.

Gain of the horizontal vestibulo‐ocular reflex (HVOR) in two monkeys performing the gaze fixation task before and during spaceflight. Active eye and head movements were monitored as the animals acquired a visual target presented 40° to left or right of center. Note that the gain of the HVOR increased significantly during the first few days in space and then decreased during the last days of the flight. However, gain was still higher than preflight levels on the final flight day. Similar results have been found in cosmonauts performing the gaze fixation task in flight.

Adapted from Sirota et al. 93 with permission


Figure 4.

Gain of upward and downward vertical optokinetic reflexes (VOKR) obtained preflight, in flight, and postflight from one astronaut. Pattern velocity was 53°/s. Gain was calculated as the ratio of mean eye velocity to pattern velocity obtained 20-40 s after stimulus onset. Note the reversal of asymmetry (upward vs. downward) during the first 3 days in space and the return to normal asymmetry by the fourth in‐flight day.

Adapted from Clement et al. 13 with permission


Figure 5.

Normalized composite equilibrium data from 10 astronauts tested prior to flight and at various times after landing (wheels stop). Data were obtained using a dynamic posturography system. The composite score is a measure of anterior-posterior sway during tests involving perturbation of the posture platform under different conditions of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive input. All astronauts showed some degree of postural instability postflight, with four individuals having clinically abnormal scores on the first postflight test. The degree of instability and rate of return to normal differed greatly among the astronauts. (The preflight scale is in days, not hours.)

From Paloski et al. 81 with permission


Figure 6.

Mean amplitude of otolith‐spinal reflex EMG elicited by a 1G stimulus in astronauts tested preflight, inflight, and postflight. Data are normalized with respect to the last preflight test, noted by star. Error bars show ± 1 SE of mean where results were available for all four subjects. Note the large reduction in amplitude inflight (ranging from ∼25% on the first day to ∼75% on the 7th day), and the rapid return to normal amplitude on the first postflight test.

Adapted from Watt et al. 105 with permission


Figure 7.

Schematic representation of time course of space motion sickness symptoms. Points on the line indicate the most common symptom level found in 57 Shuttle astronauts at specific times in flight, and vertical striping represents the range of symptoms. (Observe that the time scale is logarithmic.) The time course indicated for space motion sickness is similar to that found under other chronic sickness‐inducing conditions, for example, sea voyages or wearing vision‐reversing prisms.

From Thornton et al. 95 with permission
References
 1. Anderson, D. J., M. F. Reschke, J. L. Homick, and S. A. S. Werness. Dynamic posture analysis of Spacelab‐1 crew members. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 380-390, 1986.
 2. Arrott, A. P., and L. R. Young. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 6. Vestibular reactions to lateral acceleration following ten days of weightlessness. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 347-357, 1986.
 3. Arrott, A. P., L. R. Young, and D. M. Merfeld. Perception of linear acceleration in weightlessness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 61: 319-326, 1990.
 4. Benson, A. J., Modification of the response to angular accelerations by linear accelerations. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vestibular System. Psychophysics, Applied Aspects and General Interpretation, edited by H. H. Kornhuber. Berlin: Springer, 1974, vol VI., pt. 2, chapt. IV, p. 281-320.
 5. Benson, A. J., J. R. Kass, and H. Vogel. European vestibular experiment on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 4. Thresholds of perception of whole‐body linear oscillation. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 264-271, 1986.
 6. Benson, A. J., and Th. Viéville. European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 6. Yaw axis vestibulo‐ocular reflex. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 279-283, 1986.
 7. Berthoz, A., Th. Brandt, J. Dichgans, Th. Probst, W. Bruzek, and T. Viéville. European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 5. Contribution of the otoliths to the vertical vestibulo‐ocular reflex. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 272-278, 1986.
 8. Berthoz, A., and G. Melvill Jones. Preface, A review of an unanswered question? In: Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories, edited by A. Berthoz and G. Melvill Jones. New York: Elsevier, 1985, p. v-vii.
 9. Bles, W., and J. L. van Raij. Pre‐ and postflight (D‐1) postural control in tilting environments. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 42: 13-17, 1988.
 10. Bloomberg, J., G. Melvill Jones, and C. Segal. Adaptive plasticity in the gaze stabilizing synergy of slow and saccadic eye movements. Exp. Brain Res. 84: 47-56, 1991.
 11. Bracchi, F., T. Gualtierotti, A. Morabito, and E. Rocca. Multi‐day recordings from the primary neurons of the statoreceptors of the labyrinth of the bull frog. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) Suppl. 334: 1-27, 1975.
 12. Clément, G., and A. Berthoz. Vestibulo‐ocular reflex and optokinetic nystagmus in microgravity. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 42: 1-4, 1988.
 13. Clément, G., T. Viéville, F. Lestienne, and A. Berthoz. Modifications of gain asymmetry and beating field of vertical optokinetic nystagmus in microgravity. Neurosci. Lett. 63: 271-274, 1986.
 14. Clément, G., T. Viéville, F. Lestienne, and A. Berthoz. Preliminary results of the ‘equilibrium and vertigo’ experiment performed during STS 51‐G shuttle flight. In: 2nd Int. Conf. Space Physiology, edited by J. Hunt. Noordwijk: European Space Agency, 1986, p. 129-135. (ESA SP‐237)
 15. Cohen, B., I. Kozlovskaya, T. Raphan, D. Solomon, D. Helwig, N. Cohen, M. Sirota, and S. Yakushin. Vestibuloocular reflex of rhesus monkeys after spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 121S-131S, 1992.
 16. Correia, M. J., A. A. Perachio, J. D. Dickman, I. B. Kozlovskaya, M. G. Sirota, S. B. Yakushin, and I. N. Beloozerova. Changes in monkey semicircular canal afferent responses following active head movements during space flight. J. Applied Physiol. 73: S112-S120, 1992.
 17. Crampton, G. H. (Editor), Motion and Space Sickness. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990.
 18. Daunton, N. G., Sensory‐motor rearrangement and motion sickness: Is there evidence for their relationship? In: Sensory‐Motor Functions under Weightlessness and Space Motion Sickness, edited by Mitarai, G. and M. Igarashi. Nagoya: University of Nagoya Press, 1985, p. 139-149.
 19. Daunton, N. G., M. D. Ross, R. A. Fox, M. L. Corcoran, L. K. Cutler, and L. C. Wu. Effects of chronic hyper‐gravity on the righting reflex and vestibular endorgan morphology in the rat. Neurosci. Abst. 17: 316, 1991.
 20. Davis, J. R., J. M. Vanderploeg, P. A. Santy, R. T. Jennings, and D. F. Stewart. Space motion sickness during 24 flights of the space shuttle. Aviat. Space Environ. Med, 59: 1185-1189, 1988.
 21. Diamond, S. G., and C. H. Markham. Prediction of space motion sickness susceptibility by disconjugate eye torsion in parabolic flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 62: 201-205, 1991.
 22. Fetter, M., and D. S. Zee. Recovery from unilateral labyrinthectomy in rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 59: 370-393, 1988.
 23. Flohr, H., W. Abeln, and U. Lüneburg. Neurotransmitter and neuromodulator systems involved in vestibular compensation. In: Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories, edited by A. Berthoz and G. Melvill Jones. New York: Elsevier, 1985, p. 269-277.
 24. Fox, R. A., N. Daunton, M. Corcoran, and L. Wu. Time‐course of behavioral adaptation to hyper‐gravity. In: Posture and Gait: Control Mechanisms, edited by M. Woollacott and F. Horak, Portland: University of Oregon Books, 1992, vol. I, p. 178-181.
 25. Fregly, A. R., Vestibular ataxia and its measurement in man. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vestibular System. Psychophysics, Applied Aspects and General Interpretation, edited by H. H. Kornhuber. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1974, vol. I, pt. 2, chapt. V, p. 321-360.
 26. Gazenko, O. G., R. A. Grigorian, Yu. V. Kreidich, G. S. Aizikov, and A. S. Markin. Compensation of cerebellar‐vestibular lesions and microgravity. In: Post‐Eesion Neural Plasticity, edited by H. Flohr. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1988, p. 331-343.
 27. Goldberg, J. M., and C. Fernández. The vestibular system. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System: Sensory Processes, edited by I. Darian‐Smith. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1984, sect. 1, vol. III, pt. 2, chapt. 21, p. 977-1022.
 28. Graybiel, A., Space motion sickness: Skylab revisited. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 51: 814-822, 1980.
 29. Graybiel, A., E. F. Miller II, J. Billingham, R. Waite, C. A. Berry, and L. F. Dietlein. Vestibular experiments in Gemini flights V and VII. Aerospace Med. 38: 360-370, 1967.
 30. Grigoryan, R. A., O. G. Gazenko, I. B. Kozlovskaya, V. A. Barmin, and Yu. V. Kreidich. The vestibulo‐cerebellar regulation of oculomotor reactions in microgravitational conditions. In: Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems, edited by E. L. Keller and D. S. Zee. New York: Pergamon, 1985, p. 121-127.
 31. Gualtierotti, T., The effect of gravity on the static and dynamic properties of single vestibular units investigated in the bull frog by means of a vestibular orbital laboratory (VOL). In: Proc. Eur. Symp. Life Sci. Res. in Space. Noordwijk: European Space Agency, 1977, p. 131-138. (ESA SP‐130)
 32. Gualtierotti, T., Vestibular integrated function and microgravity. In: Proc. Third Eur. Symp. on Life Sci. Res. in Space. Noordwijk: European Space Agency, 1987, p. 227-232. (ESA SP‐271)
 33. Homick, J. L., and E. F. Miller II., Apollo flight crew vestibular assessment. In: Biomedical Results of Apollo, edited by R. S. Johnston, L. F. Dietlein, and C. A. Berry. Washington, D. C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1975, p. 323-340. (NASA SP‐368)
 34. Homick, J. L., M. F. Reschke, and E. F. Miller II., The effects of prolonged exposure to weightlessness on postural equilibrium. In: Biomedical Results from Skylab, edited by R. S. Johnston, and L. F. Dietlein. Washington, D. C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1977, p. 104-112. (NASA SP‐377)
 35. Homick, J. L., and J. M. Vanderploeg. The neurovestibular system. In: Space Physiology and Medicine (2nd ed.), edited by A. E. Nicogossian, C. L. Huntoon, and S. L. Pool. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1989, p. 154-166.
 36. Howard, I. P., The vestibular system. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Sensory Processes and Perception, edited by K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas. New York: Wiley, 1986, vol I, p. 11‐1-11‐30.
 37. Howard, I. P., The perception of posture, self motion, and the visual vertical. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Sensory Processes and Perception, edited by K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas. New York: Wiley, 1986, vol. I, p. 18-1-;18‐62.
 38. Igarashi, M., Physical exercise and acceleration of vestibular compensation. In: Vestibular Compensation: Facts, Theories and Clinical Perspectives, edited by M. Lacour, M. Toupet, P. Denise, and Y. Christen. Paris: Elsevier, 1989, p. 131-143.
 39. Igarashi, M., T. Himi, W. B. Kulecz, and S. Patel. The role of saccular afferents in vertical optokinetic nystagmus in primates; A study in relation to optokinetic nystagmus in microgravity. Arch. Otorhinolarynol. 244: 143-146, 1987.
 40. Igarashi, M., K. Ishikawa, M. Ishii, and H. Yamane. Physical exercise and balance compensation after total ablation of vestibular organs. In: Progress in Brain Research: Vestibulospinal Control of Posture and Locomotion, edited by O. Pompiano, and J. H. H. Alum. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988, p. 395-401.
 41. Igarashi, M., M. Takahashi, T. Kubo, J. K. Levy, and J. L. Homick. Effect of macular ablation on vertical optokinetic nystagmus in the squirrel monkey. ORL 40: 312-318, 1978.
 42. Igarashi, M., G. C. Thompson, A. M. Thompson, and S. Usami. Neurochemical and neuropharmacological studies on vestibular compensation/adaptation. In: Basic and Applied Aspects of Vestibular Function, edited by J. C. Hwang, N. G. Daunton, and V. J. Wilson. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1988, p. 89-97.
 43. Jones, T. A., C. Fermin, P. Y. Hester, and J. Vellinger. Effects of microgravity on vestibular ontogeny: Direct physiological and anatomical measurements following space flight (STS‐29). Acta Vet. B.R.N.O. Czech. 62 (Suppl 6) S35-S42, 1993.
 44. Keefe, J. R., H. W. Scheld, J. F. Boyd, P. M. Fuller, and J. M. Oppenheimer. Killifish development in zero‐G on Cosmos 782: Fundulus Experiment K‐104. In: Final Reports of U.S. Experiments Flown on the Soviet Satellite Cosmos 782, edited by S. N. Rosenzweig, and K. A. Souza. Moffett Field: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1978, p. 179-199, (Technical Memorandum 78525).
 45. Kenyon, R. V., and L. R. Young. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 5. Postural responses following exposure to weightlessness. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 335-346, 1986.
 46. Kornilova, L. N., G. Bodo, I. K. Tarasov, and V. N. Alekseyev. Pattern of vestibular reactions and sensory interaction in weightlessness (data from “Optokinez” experiment). (in Russian) Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med. 24: 16-20, 1990. (in English) USSR Space Life Sciences Digest, Issue 30, NASA Contractor Report 3922(36): 63-66, 1991.
 47. Kornilova, L. N., A. M. Goncharenko, G. Bodo, K. Elkan, V. Grigorova, and A. Manev. Pathogenesis of sensory disorders in microgravity. Physiologist 34: S36-S39, 1991.
 48. Kornilova, L. N., A. M. Goncharenko, S. B. Korsunskiy, I. K. Tarasov, and V. N. Alekseyev. Vestibular function and sensory interaction after space flight. (in Russian) Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med. 25: 12-17, 1991. (in English) USSR Space Life Sciences Digest, Issue 32, NASA Contractor Report 3922(38): 57-62, 1992.
 49. Kornilova, L. N., A. M. Goncharenko, V. V. Polyakov, V. Grigorova, and A. Manev. Modifications of spontaneous oculomotor activity in microgravitational conditions. Acta Astronautica 23: 79-84, 1991.
 50. Kozlovskaya, I. Mechanisms of sensory‐motor adaptation in space flight. Presented at XVII Bárány Society Meeting, Prague, Czechoslovakia, June 1-5, 1992.
 51. Kozlovskaya, I. B., I. F. Aslanova, L. S. Grigorieva, and Yu. V. Kreidich. Experimental analysis of motor effects of weightlessness. Physiologist 25: S49-S52, 1982.
 52. Kozlovskaya, I. B., B. M. Babaev, V. A. Barmin, I. N. Beloozerova, L. N. Kornilova, M. G. Sirota, and S. B. Yakushin. Human and animal results on vestibular research in space‐Veris. In: Proc. Fourth Eur. Symp. Life Sci. Res. in Space. Noordwijk: European Space Agency, p. 353-357, 1990. (ESA SP‐307)
 53. Kozlovskaya, I. B., B. M. Babaev, V. A. Barmin, I. I. Beloozerova, Yu. V. Kreidich, and M. G. Sirota. The effect of weightlessness on motor and vestibulo‐motor reactions. Physiologist 27: S111-S114, 1984.
 54. Kozlovskaya, I. B., V. A. Barmin, Yu. V. Kreidich, and A. A. Repin. The effects of real and simulated microgravity on vestibulo‐oculomotor interaction. Physiologist 28: S51-S56, 1985.
 55. Kozlovskaya, I. B., E. A. Ilyin, M. G. Sirota, V. I. Korolkov, B. M. Babayev, I. N. Beloozerova, and S. B. Yakushin. Studies of space adaptation syndrome in experiments on primates performed on board of Soviet biosatellite “COSMOS‐1887”. Physiologist 32: S45-S48, 1989.
 56. Kozlovskaya, I. B., Yu. V. Kreidich, V. S. Oganov, and O. P. Koserenko. Pathophysiology of motor functions in prolonged manned space flights. Acta Astronautica 8: 1059-1072, 1981.
 57. Krasnov, I. B., Morphological manifestations of changes in vestibular impulses in the cerebellar nodulus of rats exposed to weightlessness. Space Biology and Aerospace Medicine: IXth All‐Union Conference, Kaluga, USSR, 1990, published (in Russian) in Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med., p. 313-315, 1990. (in English) USSR Space Life Sciences Digest, Issue 31, NASA Contractor Report 3922(37) 68-69, 1991.
 58. Lackner, J. R., and A. Graybiel. Variations in gravitoinertial force level affect the gain of the vestibulo‐ocular reflex. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 52: 154-158, 1981.
 59. Lacour, M., L. Ez‐Zaher, and C. Xerri. Sensorimotor activity and metabolic factors in vestibular compensation. In: Post‐Lesion Neural Plasticity, edited by H. Flohr. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1988, p. 675-685.
 60. Lacour, M., M. Toupet, P. Denise, and Y. Christen, (Editors) Vestibular Compensation: Facts, Theories and Clinical Perspectives. Paris: Elsevier, 1989.
 61. Lichtenberg, B. K., Vestibular factors influencing the biomedical support of humans in space. In: Basic and Applied Aspects of Vestibular Function, edited by J. C. Hwang, N. G. Daunton and V. J. Wilson. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1988, p. 175-181.
 62. Lichtenberg, B. K., A. P. Arrott, and L. R. Young. Human ocular counterrolling induced by varying linear accelerations. Exp. Brain Res. 48: 127-136, 1982.
 63. Llinás, R., and K. Walton. Vestibular compensation: a distributed property of the central nervous system. In: Integration in the Nervous System, edited by H. Asanuma and V. J. Wilson. Tokyo: Igakushoin, 1979, p. 145-166.
 64. Lychakov, D. V., Functional and adaptive changes in the vestibular apparatus in space flight. Physiologist 34: S204-S205, 1991.
 65. Lychakov, D. V., A. N. Pashchin, A. Boyadzhiyeva‐Mikhaylova, and I. Khristov. A study of the structure of the receptor organs of the vestibular apparatus in rats after flight on COSMOS‐1667. (in Russian) Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med. 23: 17-26, 1989. (in English) USSR Space Life Sciences Digest, Issue 26, NASA Contractor Report 3922(31): 55-57, 1990.
 66. Markham, C. H., and S. G. Diamond. Further evidence to support disconjugate eye torsion as a predictor of space motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 63: 118-121, 1992.
 67. Matsnev, E. I., I. Y. Yakovleva, I. K. Tarasov, V. N. Alekseev, L. N. Kornilova, A. D. Mateev, and G. I. Gorgiladze. Space motion sickness: Phenomenology, countermeasures, and mechanisms. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 54: 312-317, 1983.
 68. Matsuo, Y., and B. Cohen. Vertical optokinetic nystagmus and vestibular nystagmus in the monkey: Up‐down asymmetry and effects of gravity. Exp. Brain Res. 53: 197-216, 1984.
 69. Melvill Jones, G., Adaptive neurobiology in space flight. In: Proc. Skylab Life Sci. Symp., edited by R. S. Johnston, and L. F. Dietlein. Houston: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1974, vol. 2, p. 847-860, (TM X‐58154)
 70. Melvill Jones, G., Auto‐adaptive control of central plasticity: Observations and speculations. In: Synergetics of the Brain, edited by E. Basar, H. Flohr, H. Haken, and A. J. Mandell. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1983, p. 122-138.
 71. Melvill Jones, G., Adaptive modulation of VOR parameters by vision. In: Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories, edited by A. Berthoz, and G. Melvill Jones. New York: Elsevier, 1985, p. 21-50.
 72. Melvill Jones, G., The peripheral vestibular message. In: The Vestibulo‐Ocular Reflex and Vertigo, edited by J. A. Sharpe, and H. O. Barber. New York: Raven, 1993, p. 1-14.
 73. Neubert, J., Synopsis of the spacelab D‐1 frog statolith experiment statex. In: Proc. Third Eur. Symp. Life Sci. Res. in Space. Noordwijk: European Space Agency, 1987, p. 241-247, (ESA SP‐271).
 74. Oman, C. M., A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) Suppl. 392: 1-14, 1982.
 75. Oman, C. M., Space motion sickness and vestibular experiments in Spacelab. In: 12th Intersociety Conf. of Soc. for Automotive Engineering Conf. Environ. Systems, 1982, p. 1-21, (SAE Tech. Paper 820833)
 76. Oman, C. M., Space motion sickness monitoring experiment: Spacelab 1. In: Motion and Space Sickness, edited by G. H. Crampton. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990, p. 217-246.
 77. Oman, C. M., and M. J. Kulbaski. Spaceflight affects the 1‐g postrotatory vestibulo‐ocular reflex. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 42: 5-8, 1988.
 78. Oman, C. M., B. K. Lichtenberg, K. E. Money, and R. K. McCoy. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 4. Space motion sickness: symptoms, stimuli, and predictability. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 316-334, 1986.
 79. Oman, C. M., L. R. Young, D. G. D. Watt, K. E. Money, B. K. Lichtenberg, R. V. Kenyon, and A. P. Arrott. MIT/Canadian spacelab experiments on vestibular adaptation and space motion sickness. In: Basic and Applied Aspects of Vestibular Function, edited by J. C. Hwang, N. G. Daunton, and V. J. Wilson. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1988, p. 183-192.
 80. Paloski, W. H., F. O. Black, M. F. Reschke, D. S. Calkins, C. Shupert. Vestibular ataxia following shuttle flights: Effects of microgravity on otolith‐mediated sensorimotor control of posture. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 14: 9-17, 1993.
 81. Paloski, W. H., M. F. Reschke, F. O. Black, D. D. Doxey, and D. L. Harm. Recovery of postural equilibrium control following spaceflight. In: Sensing and Controlling Motion: Vestibular and Sensorimotor Function, edited by B. Cohen, D. L. Tomko, and F. Guedry. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 656: 747-754, 1992.
 82. Paloski, W. H., M. F. Reschke, D. D. Doxey, and F. O. Black. Neurosensory adaptation associated with postural ataxia following spaceflight. In: Posture and Gait: Control Mechanisms, edited by M. Woollacott, and F. Horak. Portland: University of Oregon Books, 1992, vol. I, p. 311-314.
 83. Parker, D. E., and K. L. Parker. Adaptation to the simulated stimulus rearrangement of weightlessness. In: Motion and Space Sickness, edited by G. H. Crampton. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990, p. 247-262.
 84. Precht, W., and N. Dieringer. Neuronal events paralleling functional recovery (compensation) following peripheral vestibular lesions. In: Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories, edited by A. Berthoz, and G. Melvill Jones. New York: Elsevier, 1985, p. 251-268.
 85. Raphan, T., B. Cohen, and V. Henn. Effects of gravity on rotatory nystagmus in monkeys. In: Vestibular and Oculomotor Physiology, edited by B. Cohen. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 374: 44-55, 1981.
 86. Reschke, M. F., D. J. Anderson, and J. L. Homick. Vestibulospinal reflexes as a function of microgravity. Science 225: 212-214, 1984.
 87. Reschke, M. F., D. J. Anderson, and J. L. Homick. Vestibulospinal response modifications as determined with the H‐reflex during the Spacelab‐1 flight. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 367-379, 1986.
 88. Reschke, M. F., and D. E. Parker. Effects of prolonged weightlessness on self‐motion perception and eye movements evoked by roll and pitch. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 58: A153-158, 1987.
 89. Ross, M. D., Implications of otoconial changes in microgravity. Physiologist 30: S90-S93, 1987.
 90. Ross, M. D., Morphological changes in the rat vestibular system following weightlessness. J. Vestib. Res. 3: 241-251, 1993.
 91. Ross, M. D., K. Donovan, and O. Chee. Otoconial morphology in space‐flown rats. Physiologist 28: S219-S220, 1985.
 92. Shipov, A. A., M. G. Sirota, I. N. Beloozerova, B. M. Babaev, and I. B. Kozlovskaya. Results of tests on the primate vestibulo‐visualmotor reactions in biocosmos experiments. In: Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems, edited by E. L. Keller, and D. S. Zee. New York: Pergamon, 1985, p. 129-131.
 93. Sirota, M. G., B. M. Babayev, I. B. Beloozerova, A. N. Nyrova, S. B. Yakushin, and I. B. Kozlovskaya. Characteristics of vestibular reactions to canal and otolith stimulation at an early stage of exposure to microgravity. Physiologist 30: S82-S84, 1987.
 94. Snyder, L. H., and W. M. King. Effect of viewing distance and location of the axis of head rotation on the monkey's vestibu‐loocular reflex. I. Eye movement responses. J. Neurophysiol. 67: 861-874.
 95. Thornton, W. E., T. P. Moore, S. L. Pool, and J. Vanderploeg. Clinical characterization and etiology of space motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 58: A1-A8, 1987.
 96. Thornton, W. E., and J. J. Uri. Oculomotor function during space flight and susceptibility to space motion sickness. Acta Astronautica 23: 53-61, 1991.
 97. Vesterhauge, S. Eye movements compensatory to active head movements gravity dependence. Theoretical considerations and experimental results. Copenhagen: Univ. of Copenhagen, 1992. Dissertation.
 98. Viéville, T., G. Clément, F. Lestienne, and A. Berthoz. Adaptive modifications of the optokinetic and vestibulo‐ocular reflexes in microgravity. In: Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor System, edited by E. L. Keller, and D. S. Zee. New York: Pergamon, 1986, p. 111-120.
 99. Viirre, E., D. Tweed, K. Milner, and T. Vilis. A Reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. J. Neurophyiol. 56: 439-450.
 100. Vinnikov, Ya. A., O. G. Gazenko, L. K. Titova, A. A. Bronstein, V. I. Govardovskii, F. G. Gribakin, R. A. Pevzner, M. Z. Aronova, T. A. Kharkeevich, T. P. Tsirulis, G. A. Pyatkina, D. V. Lichakov, L. P. Pal'mbach, and V. F. Anichin. The structural and functional organization of the vestibular apparatus of rats exposed to weightlessness for 20 days on board the Sputnik “Kosmos‐782”. Acta Otolaryngol. 87: 90-96, 1979.
 101. Vogel, H., and J. R. Kass. European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 7. Ocular counterrolling measurements pre‐ and postflight. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 284-290, 1986.
 102. von Baumgarten, R. J., European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 1. Overview. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 239-246, 1986.
 103. Watt, D. G. D., The vestibulo‐ocular reflex and its possible roles in space motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 58: A170-174, 1987.
 104. Watt, D. G. D., K. E. Money, R. L. Bondar, R. B. Thirsk, M. Garneau, and P. Sculy‐Power. Canadian medical experiments on Shuttle flight 41‐G. Can. Astronaut. Space J. 31: 215-226, 1985.
 105. Watt, D. G. D., K. E. Money, and L. M. Tomi. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 3. Effects of prolonged weightlessness on a human otolith‐spinal reflex. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 308-315, 1986.
 106. Wilson, V., and G. Melvill Jones. Mammalian Vestibular Physiology. New York: Plenum, 1979.
 107. Working Group on Evaluation of Tests for Vestibular Function. Evaluation of tests for vestibular function. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 63: A1-A21, 1992.
 108. Xerri, C., M. Lacour, and L. Borel. Multimodal sensory substitution process in vestibular compensation. In: Post‐Lesion Neural Plasticity, edited by H. Flohr. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1988, p. 357-370.
 109. Yakovleva, I. Yu., L. N. Kornilova, I. K. Tarasov, and V. N. Alekseyev. Results of the study of the vestibular apparatus and the functions of the perception of space in cosmonauts (pre‐ and post‐flight observations). Washington, D. C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1980. (TM 76485).
 110. Yakushin, S. B., M. G. Sirota, I. N. Beloozerova, and I. B. Kozlovskaya. Eye‐head coordination in monkey (Macaca mulatta) in gaze fixation during the “COSMOS” biosatellite flight. Presented at XVII Bárány Society Meeting, Prague, Czechoslovakia, June 1-5, 1992.
 111. Young, L. R., Perception of the body in space: mechanisms. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System, edited by I. Darian‐Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, sect. 1, chapt. 22, vol. III, p. 2, p. 1023-1066.
 112. Young, L. R., Vestibular adaptation to weightlessness. In: Proc. Symp. Vestibular Organs and Altered Force Environ, edited by M. Igarashi, and K. G. Nute. Houston: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1988, p. 85-90.
 113. Young, L. R., D. K. Jackson, N. Groleau, and S. Modestino. Multisensory integration in microgravity. In: Sensing and Controlling Motion, Vestibular and Sensorimotor Function, edited by B. Cohen, D. L. Tomko, and F. Guedry. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 656: 340-353, 1992.
 114. Young, L. R., B. K. Lichtenberg, A. P. Arrott, T. A. Crites, C. M. Oman, and E. R. Edelman. Ocular torsion on earth and in weightlessness. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 374: 80-92, 1981.
 115. Young, L. R., C. M. Oman, D. G. D. Watt, K. E. Money, and B. K. Lichtenberg. Spatial orientation in weightlessness and readaptation to earth's gravity. Science 225: 205-208, 1984.
 116. Young, L. R., C. M. Oman, D. G. D. Watt, K. E. Money, B. K. Lichtenberg, R. V. Kenyon, and A. P. Arrott. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab 1 mission: 1. Sensory adaptation to weightlessness and readaptation to one‐G: An overview. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 291-298, 1986.
 117. Young, L. R., and M. Shelhamer. Microgravity enhances the relative contribution of visually‐induced motion sensation. Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 61: 525-530, 1990.
 118. Young, L. R., M. Shelhamer, and S. Modestino. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab‐1 mission: 2. Visual vestibular tilt interaction in weightlessness. Exp. Brain Res. 64: 299-307, 1986.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

Article Title: Adaptation of the Vestibular System to Microgravity
 

How to Cite

Nancy G. Daunton. Adaptation of the Vestibular System to Microgravity. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 14: Handbook of Physiology, Environmental Physiology: 765-783. First published in print 1996. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp040133