Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library
For Librarians For Authors Editors About

Extraauditory Effects of Acoustic Stimulation

Alexander Cohen

10.1002/cphy.cp090103

Source: Supplement 26: Handbook of Physiology, Reactions to Environmental Agents

Originally published: 1977

Published online: January 2011

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Neurophysiological Basis for Extraauditory Effects
2 Specific Extraauditory Effects
2.1 Aspects of Sensory Interaction
2.2 Reflex Response to Sound
3 General Extraauditory Effects
3.1 Effects of Sound Stimulation on Psychological State
3.2 Effects of Sound Stimulation on Physiological State
4 Special Considerations Regarding Extraauditory Response to Sound
4.1 Exposure to Infrasound and Ultrasound
4.2 Stress‐Sensitive Groups
Figure 1.

Suggested organization of the auditory nervous system to account for the auditory and extraauditory effects of acoustic stimulation.

Adapted from Grandjean 46 and Kryter 66
Figure 2.

Percentage increase in pupil size as a function of the sound level of a broad‐band noise. F, pupil diameter; dB, decibel.

From Jansen 59
Figure 3.

Average time (in seconds) for subjects to maintain balance standing in heel‐to‐toe fashion on rails, from 0.50 to 1.75 inches in width, for sets of 60‐s test trials. The control condition consisted of ambient noise levels of 70 dB; the balanced noise condition involved exposure to a 120‐dB noise field while wearing ear protectors, effectively reducing the sound level in each ear canal to 80 dB. The unbalanced condition also involved exposures to the 120‐dB noise field, but with differential ear protection, resulting in sound levels of 100 dB in one ear and 80 dB in the other.

From Nixon et al. 84
Figure 4.

The effects of noise on a serial decoding operation involving multiple‐choice responses to light signals dependent on a programmed code. The signals were presented at three different rates (30, 40, and 50 per min) under 50‐dBA (quiet) and 100‐dBA intermittent noise conditions.

From Cohen 29
Figure 5.

Relationship between level of arousal, increasing from a sleeplike state to extreme agitation, and performance effectiveness. The arousal level for optimum task performance is noted by the A location at the crest of the inverted U‐shaped function. Sound excitation adds an arbitrary increment to arousal. This can reduce performance effectiveness for task situations already creating arousal conditions at or beyond the high point on the curve such as C, which becomes shifted to C′. On the other hand, such acoustic stimulation can improve performance, if the task situation has otherwise low arousal as shown by point B, which becomes shifted to B′. Sound stimulation may also shift the arousal level from the front to a matching position on the back part of the arousal curve with little consequent effect on performance as depicted by D and D′.

From Carpenter 23
Figure 6.

Relative proportions of time spent in the five different sleep stages during a given night, and differences in sound levels above background to cause awakening from these various sleep stages. The designated sleep stages represent different states of sleep as classified by certain frequency and waveform features of electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings taken during the sleeping period. Stage 1 represents a drowsy, half‐awake condition displaying EEG cyclic variations of low magnitude in the 8-12 Hz and 3-7 Hz ranges. Stage 2 is a deeper stage of sleep characterized by the presence of spindling and sporadic bursts of high voltage positive and negative displacements in the wave form (K‐complex). Stages 3 and 4 are still deeper sleep stages, revealing delta or slower‐wave patterns of significant magnitude. During rapid‐eye‐movement, stage REM, the EEG frequency is much like Stage 1 except that bursts of rapid‐eye‐movements are seen from electrodes attached near the outer canthi. Stage REM is the period during which dreaming generally occurs. During a normal night of sleep, the cycle of different sleep stages repeats approximately every 90-120 min, with decreasing time spent in Stages 3 and 4 and increasing time spent in the REM stage.

From Dobbs 37
Figure 7.

Percentage decrease of finger pulse amplitudes in response to increasing levels of third‐octave bands of noise centered at the frequencies indicated. dB, decibel.
Figure 8.

Differences in percentage of occurrences of physiological problems in 1,005 German iron and steel workers. Peripheral circulation problems included pale and taut skin, mouth, and pharynx symptoms, abnormal sensations in extremities, paleness of mucous membranes, and other vascular disturbances.

From Jansen 58 as adapted by Kryter 66


Figure 1.

Suggested organization of the auditory nervous system to account for the auditory and extraauditory effects of acoustic stimulation.

Adapted from Grandjean 46 and Kryter 66


Figure 2.

Percentage increase in pupil size as a function of the sound level of a broad‐band noise. F, pupil diameter; dB, decibel.

From Jansen 59


Figure 3.

Average time (in seconds) for subjects to maintain balance standing in heel‐to‐toe fashion on rails, from 0.50 to 1.75 inches in width, for sets of 60‐s test trials. The control condition consisted of ambient noise levels of 70 dB; the balanced noise condition involved exposure to a 120‐dB noise field while wearing ear protectors, effectively reducing the sound level in each ear canal to 80 dB. The unbalanced condition also involved exposures to the 120‐dB noise field, but with differential ear protection, resulting in sound levels of 100 dB in one ear and 80 dB in the other.

From Nixon et al. 84


Figure 4.

The effects of noise on a serial decoding operation involving multiple‐choice responses to light signals dependent on a programmed code. The signals were presented at three different rates (30, 40, and 50 per min) under 50‐dBA (quiet) and 100‐dBA intermittent noise conditions.

From Cohen 29


Figure 5.

Relationship between level of arousal, increasing from a sleeplike state to extreme agitation, and performance effectiveness. The arousal level for optimum task performance is noted by the A location at the crest of the inverted U‐shaped function. Sound excitation adds an arbitrary increment to arousal. This can reduce performance effectiveness for task situations already creating arousal conditions at or beyond the high point on the curve such as C, which becomes shifted to C′. On the other hand, such acoustic stimulation can improve performance, if the task situation has otherwise low arousal as shown by point B, which becomes shifted to B′. Sound stimulation may also shift the arousal level from the front to a matching position on the back part of the arousal curve with little consequent effect on performance as depicted by D and D′.

From Carpenter 23


Figure 6.

Relative proportions of time spent in the five different sleep stages during a given night, and differences in sound levels above background to cause awakening from these various sleep stages. The designated sleep stages represent different states of sleep as classified by certain frequency and waveform features of electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings taken during the sleeping period. Stage 1 represents a drowsy, half‐awake condition displaying EEG cyclic variations of low magnitude in the 8-12 Hz and 3-7 Hz ranges. Stage 2 is a deeper stage of sleep characterized by the presence of spindling and sporadic bursts of high voltage positive and negative displacements in the wave form (K‐complex). Stages 3 and 4 are still deeper sleep stages, revealing delta or slower‐wave patterns of significant magnitude. During rapid‐eye‐movement, stage REM, the EEG frequency is much like Stage 1 except that bursts of rapid‐eye‐movements are seen from electrodes attached near the outer canthi. Stage REM is the period during which dreaming generally occurs. During a normal night of sleep, the cycle of different sleep stages repeats approximately every 90-120 min, with decreasing time spent in Stages 3 and 4 and increasing time spent in the REM stage.

From Dobbs 37


Figure 7.

Percentage decrease of finger pulse amplitudes in response to increasing levels of third‐octave bands of noise centered at the frequencies indicated. dB, decibel.



Figure 8.

Differences in percentage of occurrences of physiological problems in 1,005 German iron and steel workers. Peripheral circulation problems included pale and taut skin, mouth, and pharynx symptoms, abnormal sensations in extremities, paleness of mucous membranes, and other vascular disturbances.

From Jansen 58 as adapted by Kryter 66
References
 1. Abey‐Wickrama, I., M. F. A'Brook, F. E. G. Gattoni, and C. F. Herridge. Mental hospital admissions and aircraft noise. Lancet 2: 1275-1277, 1969.
 2. Action, W. I. A criterion for the prediction of auditory and subjective effects due to air‐borne noise from ultrasonic sources. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 11: 227-234, 1968.
 3. Acton, W. I., and M. B. Carson. Auditory and subjective effects due to airborne noise from industrial ultrasonic sources. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 24: 297-304, 1967.
 4. Ades, H., A. Graybiel, S. N. Morrill, G. C. Tolhurst, and J. I. Niven. Nystagmus elicited by high intensity sound. U. S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Pensacola, Florida, 1957. (Report No. 6).
 5. Anon. Field study of residential acoustics. Rockville, Md.: National Homebuilders Association Research Foundation, 1967. (Report No. 155.09).
 6. Anthony, A., and E. Ackerman. Stress effects of noise in vertebrate animals. Wright‐Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1969. (WADC Tech. Rept. 58-622).
 7. Anticaglia, J. R., and A. Cohen. Extra‐auditory effects of noise as a health hazard. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 31: 277-281, 1970.
 8. Arguelles, A. E., M. A. Martinez, E. Pucciarelli, and M. V. Disisto. Endocrine and metabolic effects of noise in normal, hypertensive and psychotic subjects. In: Physiological Effects of Noise, edited by B. L. Welch and A. S. Welch. New York: Plenum Press, 1970, p. 43-55.
 9. Benko, E. Weitere Angaben uber die durch Larmschaden bedingte Gesichtsfeldeinengung. Opthalmologia 143: 76-80, 1962.
 10. Boggs, D. H., and J. R. Simon. Differential effects of noise on tasks of varying complexity. J. Appl. Psychol. 52: 148-153, 1968.
 11. Borsky, P. N. Some of the human factors underlying community reactions to Air Force noise. Annual Meeting of Armed Forces‐National Research Council Committee on Hearing and Bioacoustics, 6th, Washington, D.C., 1958.
 12. Borsky, P. N. Community reaction to sonic booms in the Oklahoma City area. Wright‐Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1965. (AMRL Report TR‐65-37).
 13. Borsky, P., Use of social surveys for measuring community responses to noise environments. In: Transportation Noises, edited by J. D. Chalupnik. Seattle, Washington: Univ. of Washington Press, 1970, p. 219-227.
 14. Broadbent, D. E. Some effects of noise on visual performance. Quart. J. Exptl. Psychol. 6: 1-5, 1954.
 15. Broadbent, D. E., and E. A. J. Little. Effects of noise reduction in a work situation. Occup. Psychol. 34: 133-140, 1960.
 16. Broadbent, D. E., Effects of noise on behavior. In: Handbook of Noise Control, edited by C. M. Harris. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 1957, p. 1-23.
 17. Broadbent, D. E. Non‐auditory effects of noise. Advan. Sci. 406-409, 1961.
 18. Broussard, I. G., R. Y. Walker, and E. E. Roberts, Jr.. The influence of noise on the visual contrast threshold. U. S. Army Medical Research Laboratory, Ft. Knox, Kentucky, 1952. (Report No. 101).
 19. Camp, W., R. Martin, and L. F. Chapman. Pain threshold and discrimination of pain intensity during brief exposure to intense noise. Science 138: 788-789, 1962.
 20. Carlin, W., W. D. Ward, A. Gershon, and R. Ingraham. Sound sensation and its effect on dental sensation threshold. Science 138: 1258-1259, 1962.
 21. Carosi, L., and F. Calabro. Prolificacy of workers in noisy industries. Folia Med., Naples 51: 264-268, 1968.
 22. Carpenter, A., Effects of noise on performance and productivity. In: Control of Noise, Symposium No. 12. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1962, p. 297-310.
 23. Carpenter, A. How does noise affect the individual? Impulse 24: 1964.
 24. Carr, C. J., and K. D. Fisher. A review of adverse biomedical effects of sound in the military environment. Washington, D.C.: Army Research Office, Department of the Army, 1971. (Contract No. DAHC 19-71‐C‐0011).
 25. Chandler, K. A. The effect of monaural and binaural tones of different intensities on the visual perception of verticality. Am. J. Psychol. 74: 260-265, 1961.
 26. Chason, L. R., and G. A. Berry. Cross‐sensory effects of white noise on color perception. U. S. Air Force Academy, Colorado, 1971. (Research Rept. 71-6).
 27. Cohen, A. Noise and psychological state. In: Proceedings of Conference on Noise as Public Health Hazard, edited by W. D. Ward and J. E. Fricke. Washington, D.C.: American Speech and Hearing Association, 1969, p. 74-88. (Report No. 4).
 28. Cohen, A., W. F. Hummel, J. W. Turner, and F. N. Dukes‐Dobos. Effects of noise on task performance. Cincinnati, Ohio: Division of Occupational Health, Public Health Service, 1966. (Tech. Rept. BR‐4).
 29. Cohen, H. H. Working efficiency as a function of noise level, work pace, and time of work (Ph.D. Dissertation). Raleigh, N.C.: North Carolina State University, 1972.
 30. Coleman, P. D., and J. Krauskopf. The influence of high intensity noise on visual thresholds. U. S. Army Medical Research Laboratory, Ft. Knox, Kentucky, 1956. (Report No. 222).
 31. Collins, W., and P. F. Iampietro. Effects on sleep of hourly presentations of simulated sonic booms. Proceedings of International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem Dubrovnik Yugoslavia, May 13-18, 1973. Washington, D. C: EPA, 1974.
 32. Davis, R. C. Motor effects of strong auditory stimuli. J. Exptl. Psychol. 38: 257-275, 1948.
 33. Davis, R. C. Electromyographic factors in aircraft control: muscular activity during steady noise and its relation to instructed responses evoked by visual signals. USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph AFB, Texas, 1956. (Report No. 55-126).
 34. Davis, R. C., A. M. Buchwald, and R. W. Frankmann. Autonomic and muscular responses and their relation to simple stimuli. Psychol. Monogr. 69 (20): 1-71, 1955.
 35. Davis, R. C., and D. W. Van Liere. Adaptation of the muscular tension response to gunfire. J. Exptl. Psychol. 39: 114-117, 1949.
 36. Dement, W. C., The basic function of dreaming. In: New Directions in Psychology. II. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 1966, p. 238-246.
 37. Dobbs, M. E. Behavioral resonses to auditory stimulation during sleep. J. Sound and Vibration 20: 467-476, 1972.
 38. Felton, J. S., and C. Spencer. Morale of workers exposed to high levels of occupational noise. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 22: 136-147, 1961.
 39. Fiske, D. W., Effects of monotonous and restricted stimulation. In: Functions of Varied Experience, edited by D. W. Fiske and A. R. Maddi. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1961, p. 106-144.
 40. Fox, J. G. Background music and industrial efficiency — a review. Appl. Ergonomics 2: 70-73, 1971.
 41. Fox, J. G., and E. D. Embry. Music — an aid to productivity. Appl. Ergonomics 3: 202-205, 1972.
 42. Gardner, W. J., J. C. R. Licklider, and A. Z. Weisz. Suppression of pain by sound. Science 132 ‐ 32-33, 1960.
 43. Glass, D. C., and J. E. Singer. Urban Stress. New York: Academic, 1972.
 44. Goodfriend, L. S., and R. L. Cordinell. Noise in hospitals. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Govt. Printing Office, 1963. (Public Health Publication No. 930‐D‐11).
 45. Graham, J. R., Migraine: clinical aspects in headaches and cranial neuralgia. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1968, p. 45-58.
 46. Grandjean, E. Summary section — Effects of noise on man. In: Proc. Conf. on Noise as a Public Health Hazard, edited by W. D. Ward and J. E. Fricke. Washington, D. C: American Speech and Hearing Association, February 1969, p. 99-102. (Report No. 4).
 47. Grandjean, E. Biological effects of noise. Paper presented at the 4th International Congress on Acoustics, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1962. Zurich: Department of Hygiene and Work Physiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1962.
 48. Green, J. E., and F. Dunn. Correlation of naturally occurring infrasonics and selected human behavior. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44: 1456, 1968.
 49. Grether, W. F. Effects on human performance of combined environmental stressors. In: Conference Proceedings No. 82 on Adaptation and Acclimatisation in Aerospace Medicine, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD). Neuilly‐Sur Seine, France: North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 1970.
 50. Guignard, J. Effects of noise on performance. In: Conference Proceedings No. 151 on Aeromedical Aspects of Vibration and Noise, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD). Neuilly‐Sur‐Seine, France: North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 1972.
 51. Harris, C. S., and H. C. Sommer. Human equilibrium during acoustic stimulation by discrete frequencies. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories. Wright‐Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1968. (Tech. Rept. No. 68-7).
 52. Hartmann, G. V. Changes in visual acuity through simultaneous stimulation of other sense organs. J. Exptl. Psychol. 16: 393-407, 1933.
 53. Hebb, D. D. Drives and the C. N. S. Psychol. Rev. 62: 243-254, 1955.
 54. Hockey, G. R. J. Effects of noise on human efficiency and some individual differences. J. Sound and Vibration 20: 299-304, 1972.
 55. Hoffman, H., and M. Fleshler. Startle reaction: modification by background acoustic stimulation. Science 141: 928-930, 1963.
 56. Hoffmann, H., and J. L. Searle. Acoustic and temporal factors in the evocation of startle. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43: 269-282, 1968.
 57. Hoffman, H., and B. L. Wible. Temporal parameters in startle facilitation by steady background signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 45: 7, 1969.
 58. Jansen, G. Adverse effects of noise on iron and steel workers. Stahl Eisen 81: 217-220, 1961.
 59. Jansen, G. Effects of noise on physiological state. In: Proceedings of Conference on Noise as a Public Health Hazard. edited by W. D. Ward and J. E. Fricke. Washington, D.C.: American Speech and Hearing Association, 1969, p. 89-88. (Report No. 4).
 60. Jansen, G., and J. Schulze. Beispiele von Schlafstorungen durch Gerausche. Klin. Wachr. 3: 132-134, 1964.
 61. Jirkova, H., and B. Kromarova. Studies of the influence of noise on the general health of workers in large engineering work (In Polish). Pracovni Lekar. 17 (4): 147-148, 1965.
 62. Jonsson, E., and S. Sorenson. On the influence of attitudes to the source of annoyance reactions to noise. Nord. Hyg. Tidskr. 48: 35-45, 1967.
 63. Kirk, R. E., and E. Hecht. Maintenance of vigilance by programmed noise. Percept. Mot. Skills. 16: 588-560, 1963.
 64. Kravkov, S. V. The influence of sound upon the light and color sensibility of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol. 14: 348, 1936.
 65. Kramer, M., T. Roth, J. Trinder, and A. Cohen. Relationship of noise‐disturbed sleep to post‐sleep behavior — an exploratory study. Washington, D. C.: Dept. of Transportation, 1971. (FAA Tech. Rept. 70-16).
 66. Kryter, K. D. Effects of noise on man. New York: Academic, 1970, p. 487-585.
 67. Landis, C., and W. A. Hunt. The Startle Pattern. New York: Ferror and Rinehart, 1939.
 68. Lindsley, D. B., Emotion. In: Handbook of Experimental Psychology, edited by S. S. Stevens. New York: Wiley, 1951, p. 473-516.
 69. Lockett, M. F., Effects of sound on endocrine function and electrolyte excretion. In: Physiological Effects of Noise, edited by B. L. Welch and A. S. Welch. New York: Plenum Press, 1970, 21-41.
 70. Lukas, J. S., and K. D. Kryter. Awakening effects of simulated sonic booms and subsonic aircraft noise. In: Physiological Effects of Noise, edited by B. L. Welch and A. S. Welch. New York: Plenum Press, 1970, p. 283-293.
 71. May, D. N. Startle in the presence of background noise. J. Sound and Vibration 17: 77-81, 1971.
 72. May, D. N., and C. G. Rice. Effects of startle due to pistol shots on control precision performance. J. Sound and Vibration 15: 197-202, 1971.
 73. McKennel, A. C., Noise complaints and community action. In: Transportation Noises, edited by J. D. Chalupnik. Seattle, Washington: Univ. of Washington Press, 1970, p. 228-244.
 74. McCroskey, R. L., Jr.. The effect of specified levels of white noise upon flicker fusion frequency. U. S. Naval Aviation Medical Center, Pensacola, Florida, 1958. (Report No. 80).
 75. McCroskey, R. L., Jr.. A research note on the effect of noise upon flicker fusion frequency. U. S. Naval Aviation Medical Center, Pensacola, Florida, 1957. (Report No. 70).
 76. McGrath, J. J., Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. In: Vigilance — A Symposium edited by D. N. Bucker and J. J. McGrath. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 1963, p. 3-19.
 77. Mech, E. V. Performance in a verbal addition task related to “set” and verbal noise. J. Exptl Educ. 22: 1-17, 1953.
 78. Merritt, H. H. Textbook of Neurology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1967, p. 764.
 79. Miller, J. D. Effects of noise on people. Washington, D.C.: EPA, 1971. (Report NTID 300.7).
 80. Minckley, B. B. A study of noise and its relationship to patient discomfort in the recovery room. Nursing Res. 17: 247-250, 1968.
 81. Mohr, G. C., J. N. Cole, E. C. Guild, and H. E. von Gierke. Effects of low frequency and infrasonic noise on man. Aerospace Med. 36: 817-824, 1965.
 82. Neher, G. M., A. E. Kerker, B. M. Tayler, G. D. Bottoms, S. M. Shaw, and M. E. Bissell. The role of noise as a physiologic stressor. Cincinnati, Ohio: Bureau of Community Environmental Management, U. S. Public Health Service, 1970. (Contract No. Ph. 86-68-146).
 83. Nixon, C. W., and P. N. Borsky. Effects of sonic booms on people: St. Louis, Missouri, 1961-1962. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39: S51-S58, 1966.
 84. Nixon, C. W., C. S. Harris, and H. E. von Gierke. Rail test to evaluate equilibrium in low level wideband noise. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, Wright‐Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1966. (Tech. Rept. 66-85).
 85. Ogilive, J. C. Effect of auditory flutter on the visual critical flicker frequency. Can. J. Psychol. 54: 167-170, 1956.
 86. Oswald, I., A. M. Taylor, and M. Triesman. Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep. Brain 83: 440-553, 1960.
 87. Pearsons, K. S. Systems of measurement. Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13-18, 1973. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Govt. Printing Office. In press.
 88. Rice, C. G., and D. N. May. Startle due to sonic boom. Statement of the Problem. Southamptom, England: Institute of Sound and Vibration, University of Southampton, 1969. (Tech. Rept. 25).
 89. Serrat, W. D., and T. Keravoski. An investigation of the effect of auditory stimulation on visual sensitivity. J. Exptl. Psychol. 19: 604-611, 1936.
 90. Shetalov, N. N., A. O. Sanitanov, and K. V. Glotova. On the state of the cardiovascular system under conditions of exposure to continuous noise. Ottawa, Canada: Defence Research Board, 1962. (Report T‐411‐R, N65-15577).
 91. Skillern, C. D. Human response to measured sound pressure levels from ultrasonic devices. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 26: 132-136, 1965.
 92. Soloyanis, G., and J. F. Corso. The effects of sound on autokinetic movement. Air Research and Development Command, U. S. Air Force, Wright‐Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1953. (Tech. Rept. No. 53-447).
 93. Southwest Research Institute. Physiologic and subjective reactions to aversive and non‐aversive sounds. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1973. (Contractor's Report HSM 099-71-39).
 94. Stevens, S. S. The effects of noise and vibration on psychomotor efficiency (OSRD Report 32). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Psychoacoustic Laboratory, Harvard University, 1941.
 95. Stevens, S. S. Stability of human performance under intense noise. J. Sound and Vibration 21: 35-50, 1972.
 96. Stein, J. Music therapy treatment techniques. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 33: 521-528, 1963.
 97. Teichner, W. H., E. Arees, and R. Reilly. Noise and human performance — a psychophysiologic approach. Ergonomics 6: 83-97, 1968.
 98. Theologus, G. C., G. R. Wheaton, A. Mirabella, and R. E. Brahlek. Development of a standardized battery of performance for assessment of stress effects (NASA Contract Report 9854). Hampton. Virginia: Langley Research Center, 1971.
 99. Tracor. Community reaction to airport noise (Final Report, NASA Contract NASW 1549). Austin, Texas: TRACOR Company, 1970.
 100. Uhrbrock, R. S. Music on the job, its influence on worker morale and production. Personnel Psychol. 4: 9-38, 1961.
 101. Vlasek, M. Effects of startle stimuli on performance. Aerospace Med. 40: 124-128, 1969.
 102. Walker, E. L., and T. M. Sawyer, Jr.. The interaction between critical flicker frequency and acoustic stimulation. Psychol. Rec. 67: 72-75, 1964.
 103. Welch, B. L., and A. S. Welch (editors). Physiological Effects of Noise. New York: Plenum Press, 1970.
 104. Wilkinson, R. T. Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. J. Exptl. Psychol. 66: 332-337, 1963.
 105. Wilkinson, R. T. Some factors influencing the effect of environmental stressors upon performance. Psychol. Bull. 72: 260-272, 1969.
 106. Williams, H. E. Effects of noise on sleep: A review. Proceedings of International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik, Jugoslavia, May 13-18, 1973. Washington, D.C.: EPA, 1974.
 107. Williams, H. E., J. R. Hammack, R. L. Daly, W. C. Dement, and A. Lubin. Responses to auditory stimulation, sleep loss, and the EEG stages of sleep. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16: 269-279, 1964.
 108. Wilson, A. Noise. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1963.
 109. Wokoun, W. Effect of music on work performance (Tech. Memo. 1-68). U. S. Army Human Engineering Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 1968.
 110. Woodhead, M. Effects of brief, loud noise on decision making. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31: 1329-1331, 1959.
 111. Woodhead, M. The effect of bursts of noise on an arithmetic task. Am. J. Psychol. 77: 627-633, 1964.
 112. Yakovlev, P. A. The influence of acoustic stimuli upon the limits of visual fields for different colors. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 28: 286-289, 1938.
 113. Zondek, B., and I. Tamahi. Effect of audiogenic stimulation on genital functions and reproduction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 80: 1041-1048, 1960.
 114. Zepler, E. E., B. M. Sullivan, C. G. Rice, M. J. Griffin, M. Oldman, P. J. Dickinson, K. P. Shephard, J. E. Ludlow, and J. B. Large. Human response to transportation noise. J. Sound and Vibration 28: 375-402, 1973.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

Article Title: Extraauditory Effects of Acoustic Stimulation
 

How to Cite

Alexander Cohen. Extraauditory Effects of Acoustic Stimulation. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 26: Handbook of Physiology, Reactions to Environmental Agents: 31-44. First published in print 1977. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp090103