Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Mechanical and Structural Plasticity

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

Excessive narrowing of the airways due to airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction is a major cause of asthma exacerbation. ASM is therefore a direct target for many drugs used in asthma therapy. The contractile mechanism of smooth muscle is not entirely clear. A major advance in the field in the last decade was the recognition and appreciation of the unique properties of smooth muscle—mechanical and structural plasticity, characterized by the muscle's ability to rapidly alter the structure of its contractile apparatus and cytoskeleton and adapt to the mechanically dynamic environment of the lung. This article describes a possible mechanism for smooth muscle to adapt and function over a large length range by adding or subtracting contractile units in series spanning the cell length; it also describes a mechanism by which actin‐myosin‐actin connectivity might be influenced by thin and thick filament lengths, thus altering the muscle response to mechanical perturbation. The new knowledge is extremely useful for our understanding of ASM behavior in the lung and could provide new and more effective targets for drugs aimed at relaxing the muscle or keeping the muscle from excessive shortening in the asthmatic airways. © 2011 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 1:283‐293, 2011.

Comprehensive Physiology offers downloadable PowerPoint presentations of figures for non-profit, educational use, provided the content is not modified and full credit is given to the author and publication.

Download a PowerPoint presentation of all images


Figure 1. Figure 1.

Length‐force relationship of tracheal smooth muscle (black circles and fitted line) superimposed on the same relationship of striated muscle (gray). Smooth muscle data replotted from Herrera et al. 27. The in situ length of the smooth muscle was taken as a reference length (Lref); the muscle was fully adapted at Lref before other forces at different length were measured. The force values were normalized to the maximal isometric force (Fmax) produced at Lref.

Figure 2. Figure 2.

Schematics illustrating the structure of a smooth muscle contractile unit and the predicted relationship between length and force based on the assumption that the extent of overlap between thick and thin filaments determines the amount of force produced. (A) A contractile unit consists of a thick filament sandwiched by two thin filaments of opposite polarity; the thin filaments are anchored by Z‐disk equivalent bodies (Z bodies) that define the boundary of a contractile unit. The thick filaments are assumed to be side polar and do not possess a central bare (cross‐bridge free) zone. (B) Illustration of diminishing overlap (black portion of the thick filament) between the thick and thin filaments as the muscle shortens. (C) Because the active force produced by the muscle is assumed to be directly proportional to the extent of filament overlap, and that the extent of overlap is directly proportional to the amount of shortening (or muscle length), the model predicts that the force‐length relationship is linear.

Figure 3. Figure 3.

Length‐force relationship of tracheal smooth muscle. In the absence of length adaptation, the final length the muscle shortens to is independent of the initial muscle length. A quick stretch of 10% (red) and 30% (blue) from Lref increases the amount of shortening but does not alter the final shortened length. In this test, a load equivalent to 30% Fmax was used in the isotonic contractions. Modified from Herrera et al. 27.

Figure 4. Figure 4.

Length‐force relationship of tracheal smooth muscle at different adapted lengths. The curve in the middle is the same as that shown in Figure 1 and is obtained after the muscle has been adapted to Lref. The curve to the right of this reference curve is obtained from the same muscle after it has been stretched to 1.5 Lref and fully adapted to the stretched length. Full adaptation is indicated by full recovery of isometric force to the level before length change. The curve to the left of the reference curve is obtained after the muscle has been shortened to 0.75 Lref and fully adapted to the shortened length.

Modified from Herrera et al. 27
Figure 5. Figure 5.

Schematic of shifts in length vs. passive tension relationship in smooth muscle. The reference curve is plotted in black, representing the relationship obtained from a muscle adapted to Lref. By adapting the same muscle at a shorter (red dotted line) or longer (blue dotted line) length, the curve can be shifted to the left (red) or right (blue) with respective to the reference curve (black).

Figure 6. Figure 6.

Force‐velocity and force‐power relationships in airway smooth muscle adapted to long (1.5 Lref) and short (0.75 Lref) lengths. Circles on the hyperbolic force‐velocity curves are experiment data from Herrera et al. 27. The power curves are obtained from the velocity curves based on the relationship: Power = force × velocity.

Figure 7. Figure 7.

Linear relationships between muscle length and shortening velocity, and between muscle length and power output. Data from Kuo et al. 33. Black line: a linear fit to combined data of velocity and power. Reference velocity and power are values obtained at Lref.

Figure 8. Figure 8.

Schematic of a smooth muscle cell adapted to two lengths, Lref and 2 × Lref. Doubling the length causes the number of contractile units to increase by two‐third, approximately matching the data presented in Figure 7. The thick filaments are assumed to be side polar and do not possess a central bare (cross‐bridge free) zone. The Z‐bodies are assumed to serve the same function as the Z‐disks in striated muscle.

Figure 9. Figure 9.

Cartoon illustration of thick filament (red) distribution inside smooth muscle cells adapted at different lengths. Black arrows indicate transverse cuts across the cells. Assuming that the cell volume is constant at different cell lengths and that the thick filaments are evenly distributed, the thick filament density measured in transverse sections (blue circles) should reflect the thick filament mass inside the cell. In this illustration, it is assumed that the thick filament number remains constant at any cell length.

Figure 10. Figure 10.

Linear relationships between muscle length and metabolic rate (rate of ATP utilization) and between muscle length and myosin (thick) filament mass. Data from Kuo et al. 33. Data for metabolic rate are available only for lengths at 1.0 and 1.5 Lref. The black line is not a linear best fit for the data on this figure but replotted from Figure 7.

Figure 11. Figure 11.

Force fluctuations promote relengthening of acetylcholine (ACh)‐contracted canine tracheal smooth muscle but have little effect on initial shortening. In this experiment, Dowell et al. 11 contracted canine trachealis first against a fixed load of 32% of maximal active force (by exposure to high concentration of [ACh]) and then again against an oscillating load with the same mean value (32% + 16% Fmax). Initial shortening was similar in both instances, but subsequent relengthening was markedly accentuated by the force fluctuations.

Adapted from Dowell et al. 11
Figure 12. Figure 12.

Force fluctuations promote relengthening of acetylcholine (ACh)‐contracted bovine tracheal smooth muscle in a fluctuation magnitude‐dependent fashion, and p38 MAPK inhibition potentiates force fluctuation‐induced relengthening. In this experiment, Lakser et al. 35 exposed bovine trachealis in “control” experiments against a fixed load of 32% of maximal active force (by exposure to high concentration of [ACh]) and then superimposed progressively increasing force fluctuations and found fluctuation magnitude‐dependent relengthening, which was potentiated in the presence of a p38 MAPK inhibitor. Relengthening was maintained even after reducing the magnitude of force fluctuations (dotted lines) to 8% Fmax from their greatest intensity (32% Fmax), suggesting that a plastic reconfiguration of the contractile apparatus had occurred. Additional experiments (not shown here) demonstrated that p38 MAPK is active in the “control” condition.

Adapted from Lakser et al. 35
Figure 13. Figure 13.

Conceptual model illustrating a hypothesized interaction between actin (thin) filament length and influence of a stretch of contracted airway smooth muscle. Stretching of smooth muscle with short actin filaments (upper panel) could break the connections between actin filaments by interposed myosin (thick) filaments; for contraction to occur subsequently, the actin and myosin filaments would have to undergo plastic rearrangement from a parallel to a series configuration, which while longer would generate less force. In contrast, stretching of smooth muscle with long actin filaments (lower panel) might not break the connections between actin filaments through myosin filaments. In this circumstance, stretching the muscle does not result in plastic elongation.

Adapted from Dulin et al. 13
Figure 14. Figure 14.

Force‐fluctuation‐induced relengthening of airway smooth muscle before and during exposure to latrunculin B (LatB). In this experiment, Dowell et al. 11 contracted canine trachealis against a fixed load of 32% of maximal active force (by exposure to high concentration of acetylcholine [ACh]) and then without delay superimposed load oscillations around the same mean value (32% ± 16% Fmax), thereby inducing relengthening of the still contracting muscle strip. Incubation with latrunculin B had little effect on initial shortening against a fixed load but markedly potentiated force fluctuation‐induced relengthening.

Adapted from Dowell et al. 11
Figure 15. Figure 15.

Markedly different initial responses to force fluctuation in acetylcholine (Ach)‐contracted vs. KCl‐contracted canine trachealis strips. Acetylcholine‐contracted airway smooth muscle strips exhibit only minor immediate relengthening upon initiation of force fluctuations, whereas KCl‐contracted strips relengthen very rapidly.

Adapted from Lavoie et al. 37


Figure 1.

Length‐force relationship of tracheal smooth muscle (black circles and fitted line) superimposed on the same relationship of striated muscle (gray). Smooth muscle data replotted from Herrera et al. 27. The in situ length of the smooth muscle was taken as a reference length (Lref); the muscle was fully adapted at Lref before other forces at different length were measured. The force values were normalized to the maximal isometric force (Fmax) produced at Lref.



Figure 2.

Schematics illustrating the structure of a smooth muscle contractile unit and the predicted relationship between length and force based on the assumption that the extent of overlap between thick and thin filaments determines the amount of force produced. (A) A contractile unit consists of a thick filament sandwiched by two thin filaments of opposite polarity; the thin filaments are anchored by Z‐disk equivalent bodies (Z bodies) that define the boundary of a contractile unit. The thick filaments are assumed to be side polar and do not possess a central bare (cross‐bridge free) zone. (B) Illustration of diminishing overlap (black portion of the thick filament) between the thick and thin filaments as the muscle shortens. (C) Because the active force produced by the muscle is assumed to be directly proportional to the extent of filament overlap, and that the extent of overlap is directly proportional to the amount of shortening (or muscle length), the model predicts that the force‐length relationship is linear.



Figure 3.

Length‐force relationship of tracheal smooth muscle. In the absence of length adaptation, the final length the muscle shortens to is independent of the initial muscle length. A quick stretch of 10% (red) and 30% (blue) from Lref increases the amount of shortening but does not alter the final shortened length. In this test, a load equivalent to 30% Fmax was used in the isotonic contractions. Modified from Herrera et al. 27.



Figure 4.

Length‐force relationship of tracheal smooth muscle at different adapted lengths. The curve in the middle is the same as that shown in Figure 1 and is obtained after the muscle has been adapted to Lref. The curve to the right of this reference curve is obtained from the same muscle after it has been stretched to 1.5 Lref and fully adapted to the stretched length. Full adaptation is indicated by full recovery of isometric force to the level before length change. The curve to the left of the reference curve is obtained after the muscle has been shortened to 0.75 Lref and fully adapted to the shortened length.

Modified from Herrera et al. 27


Figure 5.

Schematic of shifts in length vs. passive tension relationship in smooth muscle. The reference curve is plotted in black, representing the relationship obtained from a muscle adapted to Lref. By adapting the same muscle at a shorter (red dotted line) or longer (blue dotted line) length, the curve can be shifted to the left (red) or right (blue) with respective to the reference curve (black).



Figure 6.

Force‐velocity and force‐power relationships in airway smooth muscle adapted to long (1.5 Lref) and short (0.75 Lref) lengths. Circles on the hyperbolic force‐velocity curves are experiment data from Herrera et al. 27. The power curves are obtained from the velocity curves based on the relationship: Power = force × velocity.



Figure 7.

Linear relationships between muscle length and shortening velocity, and between muscle length and power output. Data from Kuo et al. 33. Black line: a linear fit to combined data of velocity and power. Reference velocity and power are values obtained at Lref.



Figure 8.

Schematic of a smooth muscle cell adapted to two lengths, Lref and 2 × Lref. Doubling the length causes the number of contractile units to increase by two‐third, approximately matching the data presented in Figure 7. The thick filaments are assumed to be side polar and do not possess a central bare (cross‐bridge free) zone. The Z‐bodies are assumed to serve the same function as the Z‐disks in striated muscle.



Figure 9.

Cartoon illustration of thick filament (red) distribution inside smooth muscle cells adapted at different lengths. Black arrows indicate transverse cuts across the cells. Assuming that the cell volume is constant at different cell lengths and that the thick filaments are evenly distributed, the thick filament density measured in transverse sections (blue circles) should reflect the thick filament mass inside the cell. In this illustration, it is assumed that the thick filament number remains constant at any cell length.



Figure 10.

Linear relationships between muscle length and metabolic rate (rate of ATP utilization) and between muscle length and myosin (thick) filament mass. Data from Kuo et al. 33. Data for metabolic rate are available only for lengths at 1.0 and 1.5 Lref. The black line is not a linear best fit for the data on this figure but replotted from Figure 7.



Figure 11.

Force fluctuations promote relengthening of acetylcholine (ACh)‐contracted canine tracheal smooth muscle but have little effect on initial shortening. In this experiment, Dowell et al. 11 contracted canine trachealis first against a fixed load of 32% of maximal active force (by exposure to high concentration of [ACh]) and then again against an oscillating load with the same mean value (32% + 16% Fmax). Initial shortening was similar in both instances, but subsequent relengthening was markedly accentuated by the force fluctuations.

Adapted from Dowell et al. 11


Figure 12.

Force fluctuations promote relengthening of acetylcholine (ACh)‐contracted bovine tracheal smooth muscle in a fluctuation magnitude‐dependent fashion, and p38 MAPK inhibition potentiates force fluctuation‐induced relengthening. In this experiment, Lakser et al. 35 exposed bovine trachealis in “control” experiments against a fixed load of 32% of maximal active force (by exposure to high concentration of [ACh]) and then superimposed progressively increasing force fluctuations and found fluctuation magnitude‐dependent relengthening, which was potentiated in the presence of a p38 MAPK inhibitor. Relengthening was maintained even after reducing the magnitude of force fluctuations (dotted lines) to 8% Fmax from their greatest intensity (32% Fmax), suggesting that a plastic reconfiguration of the contractile apparatus had occurred. Additional experiments (not shown here) demonstrated that p38 MAPK is active in the “control” condition.

Adapted from Lakser et al. 35


Figure 13.

Conceptual model illustrating a hypothesized interaction between actin (thin) filament length and influence of a stretch of contracted airway smooth muscle. Stretching of smooth muscle with short actin filaments (upper panel) could break the connections between actin filaments by interposed myosin (thick) filaments; for contraction to occur subsequently, the actin and myosin filaments would have to undergo plastic rearrangement from a parallel to a series configuration, which while longer would generate less force. In contrast, stretching of smooth muscle with long actin filaments (lower panel) might not break the connections between actin filaments through myosin filaments. In this circumstance, stretching the muscle does not result in plastic elongation.

Adapted from Dulin et al. 13


Figure 14.

Force‐fluctuation‐induced relengthening of airway smooth muscle before and during exposure to latrunculin B (LatB). In this experiment, Dowell et al. 11 contracted canine trachealis against a fixed load of 32% of maximal active force (by exposure to high concentration of acetylcholine [ACh]) and then without delay superimposed load oscillations around the same mean value (32% ± 16% Fmax), thereby inducing relengthening of the still contracting muscle strip. Incubation with latrunculin B had little effect on initial shortening against a fixed load but markedly potentiated force fluctuation‐induced relengthening.

Adapted from Dowell et al. 11


Figure 15.

Markedly different initial responses to force fluctuation in acetylcholine (Ach)‐contracted vs. KCl‐contracted canine trachealis strips. Acetylcholine‐contracted airway smooth muscle strips exhibit only minor immediate relengthening upon initiation of force fluctuations, whereas KCl‐contracted strips relengthen very rapidly.

Adapted from Lavoie et al. 37
References
 1. An SS, Bai TR, Bates JH, Black JL, Brown RH, Brusasco V, Chitano P, Deng L, Dowell M, Eidelman DH, Fabry B, Fairbank NJ, Ford LE, Fredberg JJ, Gerthoffer WT, Gilbert SH, Gosens R, Gunst SJ, Halayko AJ, Ingram RH, Irvin CG, James AL, Janssen LJ, King GG, Knight DA, Lauzon AM, Lakser OJ, Ludwig MS, Lutchen KR, Maksym GN, Martin JG, Mauad T, McParland BE, Mijailovich SM, Mitchell HW, Mitchell RW, Mitzner W, Murphy TM, Pare PD, Pellegrino R, Sanderson MJ, Schellenberg RR, Seow CY, Silveira PS, Smith PG, Solway J, Stephens NL, Sterk PJ, Stewart AG, Tang DD, Tepper RS, Tran T, Wang L. Airway smooth muscle dynamics: A common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma. Eur Respir J 29: 834‐860, 2007.
 2. Bagby RM. Organization of contractile/cytoskeletal elements. In: Stephens NL, editor. Biochemistry of Smooth Muscle. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1983, p. 1‐84.
 3. Bai TR, Bates JH, Brusasco V, Camoretti‐Mercado B, Chitano P, Deng LH, Dowell M, Fabry B, Ford LE, Fredberg JJ, Gerthoffer WT, Gilbert SH, Gunst SJ, Hai CM, Halayko AJ, Hirst SJ, James AL, Janssen LJ, Jones KA, King GG, Lakser OJ, Lambert RK, Lauzon AM, Lutchen KR, Maksym GN, Meiss RA, Mijailovich SM, Mitchell HW, Mitchell RW, Mitzner W, Murphy TM, Pare PD, Schellenberg RR, Seow CY, Sieck GC, Smith PG, Smolensky AV, Solway J, Stephens NL, Stewart AG, Tang DD, Wang L. On the terminology for describing the length‐force relationship and its changes in airway smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 97: 2029‐2034, 2004.
 4. Benndorf R, Hayess K, Ryazantsev S, Wieske M, Behlke J, Lutsch G. Phosphorylation and supramolecular organization of murine small heat shock protein HSP25 abolish its actin polymerization‐inhibiting activity. J Biol Chem 269: 20780‐20784, 1994.
 5. Bosse Y, Solomon D, Chin LY, Lian K, Pare PD, Seow CY. Increase in passive stiffness at reduced airway smooth muscle length: Potential impact on airway responsiveness. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 298: L277‐L287, 2010.
 6. Bursac P, Lenormand G, Fabry B, Oliver M, Weitz DA, Viasnoff V, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ. Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell. Nat Mater 4 (7): 557‐561, 2005.
 7. Chen B, Liu G, Shardonofsky F, Dowell M, Lakser O, Mitchell RW, Fredberg JJ, Pinto LH, Solway J. Tidal breathing pattern differentially antagonizes bronchoconstriction in C57BL/6J vs. A/J mice. J Appl Physiol 101: 249‐255, 2006.
 8. Chin LYM, Bosse Y, Pare PD, Seow CY. Myosin filament assembly in airway smooth muscle (abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179: A2063, 2009.
 9. Deal EC Jr, McFadden ER Jr, Ingram RH Jr, Jaeger JJ. Hyperpnea and heat flux: Initial reaction sequence in exercise‐induced asthma. J Appl Physiol 46: 476‐483, 1979.
 10. Deng L, Trepat X, Butler JP, Millet E, Morgan KG, Weitz DA, Fredberg JJ. Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton. Nat Mater 5 (8): 636‐640, 2006.
 11. Dowell ML, Lakser OJ, Gerthoffer WT, Fredberg JJ, Stelmack GL, Halayko AJ, Solway J, Mitchell RW. Latrunculin B increases force fluctuation‐induced relengthening of ACh‐contracted, isotonically shortened canine tracheal smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 98: 489‐497, 2005.
 12. Dowell ML, Lavoie TL, Lakser OJ, Dulin NO, Fredberg JJ, Gerthoffer WT, Seow CY, Mitchell RW, Solway J. MEK modulates force fluctuation‐induced relengthening of canine tracheal smooth muscle. Eur Respir J 36: 630‐637, 2010.
 13. Dulin NO, Fernandes DJ, Dowell M, Bellam S, McConville J, Lakser O, Mitchell R, Camoretti‐Mercado B, Kogut P, Solway J. What evidence implicates airway smooth muscle in the cause of BHR? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 24: 73‐84, 2003.
 14. Farkas GA, Roussos C. Diaphragm in emphysematous hamsters: Sarcomere adaptability. J Appl Physiol 54: 1635‐1640, 1983.
 15. Fredberg JJ, Inouye DS, Mijailovich SM, Butler JP. Perturbed equilibrium of myosin binding in airway smooth muscle and its implications in bronchospasm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 959‐967, 1999.
 16. Freedman S, Lane R, Gillett MK, Guz A. Abolition of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction by the hyperventilation of exercise or volition. Thorax 43: 631‐636, 1988.
 17. Gillis JM, Cao ML, Godfraind‐De Becker A. Density of myosin filaments in the rat anococcygeus muscle, at rest and in contraction. II. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 9: 18‐29, 1988.
 18. Godfraind‐De Becker A, Gillis JM. Analysis of the birefringence of the smooth muscle anococcygeus of the rat, at rest and in contraction. I. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 9: 9‐17, 1988.
 19. Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 184: 170‐192, 1966.
 20. Gunst SJ, Meiss RA, Wu MF, Rowe M. Mechanisms for the mechanical plasticity of tracheal smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 268: C1267‐C1276, 1995.
 21. Gunst SJ, Zhang W. Actin cytoskeletal dynamics in smooth muscle: A new paradigm for the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295 (3): C576‐C587, 2008.
 22. Hamoir G. Extractability and properties of the contractile proteins of vertebrate smooth muscle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265: 169‐181, 1973.
 23. Hanson J, Huxley HE. Structural basis of the cross‐striations in muscle. Nature 172: 530‐532, 1953.
 24. Harris DE, Warshaw DM. Length vs. active force relationship in single isolated smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol 260 (5, Pt 1): C1104‐C1112, 1991.
 25. Herrera AM, Kuo KH, Seow CY. Influence of calcium on myosin thick filament formation in intact airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C310‐C316, 2002.
 26. Herrera AM, Martinez EC, Seow CY. Electron microscopic study of actin polymerization in airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 286: L1161‐1168, 2004.
 27. Herrera AM, McParland BE, Bienkowska A, Tait R, Pare PD, Seow CY. “Sarcomeres” of smooth muscle: Functional characteristics and ultrastructural evidence. J Cell Sci 118: 2381‐2392, 2005.
 28. Horowitz A, Trybus KM, Bowman DS, Fay FS. Antibodies probe for folded monomeric myosin in relaxed and contracted smooth muscle. J Cell Biol 126: 1195‐1200, 1994.
 29. Huxley AF, Niedergerke R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature 173: 971‐973, 1954.
 30. Kendrick‐Jones J, Smith RC, Craig R, Citi S. Polymerization of vertebrate non‐muscle and smooth muscle myosins. J Mol Biol 198: 241‐252, 1987.
 31. Kim HR, Gallant C, Leavis PC, Gunst SJ, Morgan KG. Cytoskeletal remodeling in differentiated vascular smooth muscle is actin isoform dependent and stimulus dependent. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295 (3): C768‐C778, 2008.
 32. Kuo KH, Herrera AM, Seow CY. Ultrastructure of airway smooth muscle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 137: 197‐208, 2003.
 33. Kuo KH, Herrera AM, Wang L, Pare PD, Ford LE, Stephens NL, Seow CY. Structure‐function correlation in airway smooth muscle adapted to different lengths. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C384‐C390, 2003.
 34. Lakser OJ, Dowell ML, Hoyte FL, Chen B, Lavoie TL, Ferreira C, Pinto LH, Dulin NO, Kogut P, Churchill J, Mitchell RW, Solway J. Steroids augment relengthening of contracted airway smooth muscle: Potential additional mechanism of benefit in asthma. Eur Respir J 32: 1224‐1230, 2008.
 35. Lakser OJ, Lindeman RP, Fredberg JJ. Inhibition of the p38 MAP kinase pathway destabilizes smooth muscle length during physiological loading. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L1117‐L1121, 2002.
 36. Lavoie JN, Hickey E, Weber LA, Landry J. Modulation of actin microfilament dynamics and fluid phase pinocytosis by phosphorylation of heat shock protein 27. J Biol Chem 268: 24210‐24214, 1993.
 37. Lavoie TL, Dowell ML, Lakser OJ, Gerthoffer WT, Fredberg JJ, Seow CY, Mitchell RW, Solway J. Disrupting actin‐myosin‐actin connectivity in airway smooth muscle as a treatment for asthma? Proc Am Thorac Soc 6: 295‐300, 2009.
 38. McFadden ER Jr, Ingram RH Jr. Exercise‐induced asthma: Observations on the initiating stimulus. N Engl J Med 301: 763‐769, 1979.
 39. Mehta D, Gunst SJ. Actin polymerization stimulated by contractile activation regulates force development in canine tracheal smooth muscle. J Physiol 519 (Pt 3): 829‐840, 1999.
 40. Mijailovich SM, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ. Perturbed equilibria of myosin binding in airway smooth muscle: Bond‐length distributions, mechanics, and ATP metabolism. Biophys J 79 (5): 2667‐2681, 2000.
 41. Murphy RA. Mechanics of vascular smooth muscle. In: Bohr DF, Somlyo AP, Sparks HV Jr, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Sec 2, The Cardiovascular System, Vol 2 Vascular Smooth Muscle. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1980, p. 325‐351.
 42. Murphy TM, Ray DW, Alger LE, Phillips IJ, Roach JC, Leff AR, Solway J. Ontogeny of dry gas hyperpnea‐induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs. J Appl Physiol 76: 1150‐1155, 1994.
 43. Opazo Saez A, Zhang W, Wu Y, Turner CE, Tang DD, Gunst SJ. Tension development during contractile stimulation of smooth muscle requires recruitment of paxillin and vinculin to the membrane. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286 (2): C433‐C447, 2004.
 44. Piotrowicz RS, Levin EG. Basolateral membrane‐associated 27‐kDa heat shock protein and microfilament polymerization. J Biol Chem 272: 25920‐25927, 1997.
 45. Pratusevich VR, Seow CY, Ford LE. Plasticity in canine airway smooth muscle. J Gen Physiol 105: 73‐94, 1995.
 46. Qi D, Mitchell RW, Burdyga T, Ford LE, Kuo KH, Seow CY. Myosin light chain phosphorylation facilitates in vivo myosin filament reassembly after mechanical perturbation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C1298‐C1305, 2002.
 47. Ray DW, Garland A, Hernandez C, Eappen S, Alger L, Solway J. Time course of bronchoconstriction induced by dry gas hyperpnea in guinea pigs. J Appl Physiol 70: 504‐510, 1991.
 48. Rovner AS, Fagnant PM, Lowey S, Trybus KM. The carboxyl‐terminal isoforms of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain determine thick filament assembly properties. J Cell Biol 156: 113‐123, 2002.
 49. Salerno FG, Shinozuka N, Fredberg JJ, Ludwig MS. Tidal volume amplitude affects the degree of induced bronchoconstriction in dogs. J Appl Physiol 87: 1674‐1677, 1999.
 50. Salter HH. Classic papers in asthma: On asthma, its pathology and treatment. In: Brewis RAL, editor. The Evolution of Understanding. Vol. 1. Science Press Limited; Philadelphia 1859, p. 106‐142.
 51. Semmrich C, Storz T, Glaser J, Merkel R, Bausch AR, Kroy K. Glass transition and rheological redundancy in F‐actin solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (51): 20199‐20203, 2007.
 52. Seow CY. Response of arterial smooth muscle to length perturbation. J Appl Physiol 89 (5): 2065‐2072, 2000.
 53. Seow CY. Biophysics: Fashionable cells. Nature 435: 1172‐1173, 2005.
 54. Seow CY. Myosin filament assembly in an ever‐changing myofilament lattice of smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289: C1363‐C1368, 2005.
 55. Seow CY, Pratusevich VR, Ford LE. Series‐to‐parallel transition in the filament lattice of airway smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 89: 869‐876, 2000.
 56. Shen X, Gunst SJ, Tepper RS. Effect of tidal volume and frequency on airway responsiveness in mechanically ventilated rabbits. J Appl Physiol 83: 1202‐1208, 1997.
 57. Skloot G, Permutt S, Togias A. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: A problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration. J Clin Invest 96 (5): 2393‐2403, 1995.
 58. Smolensky AV, Ragozzino J, Gilbert SH, Seow CY, Ford LE. Length‐dependent filament formation assessed from birefringence increases during activation of porcine tracheal muscle. J Physiol 563: 517‐527, 2005.
 59. Speich JE, Almasri AM, Bhatia H, Klausner AP, Ratz PH. Adaptation of the length‐active tension relationship in rabbit detrusor. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 297: F1119‐F1128, 2009.
 60. Stirling DR, Cotton DJ, Graham BL, Hodgson WC, Cockcroft DW, Dosman JA. Characteristics of airway tone during exercise in patients with asthma. J Appl Physiol 54: 934‐942, 1983.
 61. Suzuki H, Onishi H, Takahashi K, Watanabe S. Structure and function of chicken gizzard myosin. J Biochem 84: 1529‐1542, 1978.
 62. Syyong H, Cheung C, Solomon D, Seow CY, Kuo KH. Adaptive response of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle to length change. J Appl Physiol 104 (4): 1014‐1020, 2008.
 63. Tang DD, Wu MF, Opazo Saez AM, Gunst SJ. The focal adhesion protein paxillin regulates contraction in canine tracheal smooth muscle. J Physiol. 542 (Pt 2): 501‐513, 2002.
 64. Trepat X, Deng L, An SS, Navajas D, Tschumperlin DJ, Gerthoffer WT, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ. Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell. Nature 447 (7144): 592‐595, 2007.
 65. Trybus KM, Lowey S. Conformational states of smooth muscle myosin. Effects of light chain phosphorylation and ionic strength. J Biol Chem 259: 8564‐8571, 1984.
 66. Trybus KM, Lowey S. Assembly of smooth muscle myosin minifilaments: Effects of phosphorylation and nucleotide binding. J Cell Biol 105: 3007‐3019, 1987.
 67. Wang L, Pare PD, Seow CY. Effects of length oscillation on the subsequent force development in swine tracheal smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 88: 2246‐2250, 2000.
 68. Wang L, Pare PD, Seow CY. Selected contribution: Effect of chronic passive length change on airway smooth muscle length‐tension relationship. J Appl Physiol 90: 734‐740, 2001.
 69. Watanabe M, Takemori S, Yagi N. X‐ray diffraction study on mammalian visceral smooth muscles in resting and activated states. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 14: 469‐475, 1993.
 70. Wieske M, Benndorf R, Behlke J, Dolling R, Grelle G, Bielka H, Lutsch G. Defined sequence segments of the small heat shock proteins HSP25 and alphaB‐crystallin inhibit actin polymerization. Eur J Biochem 268: 2083‐2090, 2001.
 71. Xu JQ, Gillis JM, Craig R. Polymerization of myosin on activation of rat anococcygeus smooth muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 18: 381‐393, 1997.
 72. Zhao R, Du L, Huang Y, Wu Y, Gunst SJ. Actin depolymerization factor/cofilin activation regulates actin polymerization and tension development in canine tracheal smooth muscle. J Biol Chem 283 (52): 36522‐36531, 2008.

Related Articles:

Mechanical Properties of Airway Smooth Muscle
Gas Exchange in Disease: Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cystic Fibrosis, and Interstitial Lung Disease
Ultrastructure of Vascular Smooth Muscle
Mechanics of Vascular Smooth Muscle

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

Chun Y. Seow, Julian Solway. Mechanical and Structural Plasticity. Compr Physiol 2010, 1: 283-293. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100024