Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Static Distribution of Lung Volumes

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Regional Static Distribution of Gas
1.1 Regional Subdivisions of Lung Volume
1.2 Relationship Between Regional and Overall Lung Volumes
2 Static Pressure‐Volume Relationship of Lungs in Situ
3 Topography of Pleural Surface Pressure in Humans
4 Mechanical Model of Static Behavior of Human Lungs
Figure 1. Figure 1.

Mean subdivisions of lung volume in 8 healthy seated men (aged 33–39 yr) at residual volume (RV) (○) and functional residual capacity (FRC) (•). Bars, 2 SE. RVr, regional residual volume; VCr, regional vital capacity; ERVr, regional expiratory reserve volume; FRCr, regional functional residual capacity; ICr, regional inspiratory capacity; TLCr, regional total lung capacity; TLCalv, alveolar volume at total lung capacity.

From Milic‐Emili 49
Figure 2. Figure 2.

Regional subdivisions of lung volume in subject in right and left lateral decubitus positions (top) and in subject in supine and prone positions (bottom) at RV (•) and FRC (○). Schematic position of external counters in relation to lungs is shown. Ordinates, vertical distance (D) in centimeters from lung bottom (the most dependent point of lungs). Abscissas, regional lung volume, expressed as percentage of regional total lung capacity (%TLCr).

From Kaneko et al. 38
Figure 3. Figure 3.

Alveolar volume expressed as percentage of its value at TLC (%TLCalv) vs. percentage of lung height in supine (top) and head‐up (bottom) dogs, rabbits, and humans at FRC.

From Milic‐Emili 49
Figure 4. Figure 4.

Mean relationships between regional (or alveolar) and overall lung volumes in 4 seated healthy men aged 33–39 yr. Solid lines, results from 3 lung regions (4.5, 13.8, and 22.5 cm from lung top). Dotted line, predicted relationship for lowermost lung zones. Dashed line (line of identity) indicates regional (or alveolar) percentile expansion equal to overall lung expansion.

From Sutherland, Katsura, and Milic‐Emili 69
Figure 5. Figure 5.

Regional volumes from Fig. 4 vs. corresponding regional static transpulmonary pressures. Upper, middle, and lower lung regions are 4.5, 13.8, and 22.5 cm, respectively, from lung top. Po, opening airway pressure; Pc, closing airway pressure; TGVr, regional trapped‐gas volume.

From Sutherland, Katsura, and Milic‐Emili 69
Figure 6. Figure 6.

Alveolar air volume‐to‐surface ratio (V:S) of in situ subpleural alveoli of rabbits as function of corresponding transpulmonary pressure (P) in various sites and conditions; V:S expressed as percentage of that found on same isolated lobe at TLC. Dashed curves, relationships of V:S vs. P in isolated lobes of rabbits; dotted lines, SE. Points that do not fit statistically the relationship of V:S vs. P in isolated lobes are indicated by arrows for 2nd intercostal space of head‐up rabbits at FRC (top) and 4th intercostal space at 90% of lung height of supine eviscerated rabbits with tungsten beads in airways (bottom). Note small difference in relationships of V:S vs. P between upper and lower lobes. Palv, alveolar pressure; Pab, abdominal pressure.

From D'Angelo 18
Figure 7. Figure 7.

Vertical distribution of pleural surface pressure needed to account for regional distribution of gas measured at FRC in the 4 seated men of Fig. 4. Predictions were made with data from Figs. 4 and 5, using the method of Milic‐Emili et al. 51. Points (○, •) indicate values obtained in 3 lung regions of Fig. 4.

From Milic‐Emili 49
Figure 8. Figure 8.

Effect of vertical gradient of pleural surface pressure on static distribution of gas within the lung during deflation. Static PV curve was taken from Fig. 5. Intrinsic static mechanical properties of the lungs are assumed to be uniform. Values of pleural surface pressure at apex and base obtained at 3 lung volumes (RV, FRC, and TLC) computed with the assumption that gradient does not change with lung volume. At full inspiration (C) all regions are expanded virtually uniformly despite pleural surface pressure differences down lung, but at RV (A) and FRC (B) pleural surface pressure gradient causes upper regions to be more expanded than lower regions.

From Milic‐Emili 49
Figure 9. Figure 9.

Effect of vertical gradient of pleural surface pressure on distribution of tidal ventilation. At the beginning of lung inflation from FRC, lower regions are operating on steeper part of compliance curve of lungs than upper regions (B). Accordingly, during slow inspiration from FRC, ventilation is greater in lower lung regions (arrows). At RV (A), pleural surface pressure at lung bottom is positive (+4.8 cmH2O) and lower airways are closed. Consequently, at the beginning of slow inspiration from RV, lower lung regions are not ventilated and lung top is preferentially ventilated (arrows).

From Milic‐Emili 49
Figure 10. Figure 10.

Distribution of gas in normal lung (A) and hypothetical lung in which surface tension is abolished (B). Static PV curve of lung in latter condition (B) should correspond to that obtained in saline‐filled lungs (broken line). When surface tension is abolished, lung apex is almost fully expanded at transpulmonary pressure of 8.5 cmH2O, so that during inspiration (when there is a further increase in transpulmonary pressure), ventilation at apex is virtually nil.

From Milic‐Emili et al. 52


Figure 1.

Mean subdivisions of lung volume in 8 healthy seated men (aged 33–39 yr) at residual volume (RV) (○) and functional residual capacity (FRC) (•). Bars, 2 SE. RVr, regional residual volume; VCr, regional vital capacity; ERVr, regional expiratory reserve volume; FRCr, regional functional residual capacity; ICr, regional inspiratory capacity; TLCr, regional total lung capacity; TLCalv, alveolar volume at total lung capacity.

From Milic‐Emili 49


Figure 2.

Regional subdivisions of lung volume in subject in right and left lateral decubitus positions (top) and in subject in supine and prone positions (bottom) at RV (•) and FRC (○). Schematic position of external counters in relation to lungs is shown. Ordinates, vertical distance (D) in centimeters from lung bottom (the most dependent point of lungs). Abscissas, regional lung volume, expressed as percentage of regional total lung capacity (%TLCr).

From Kaneko et al. 38


Figure 3.

Alveolar volume expressed as percentage of its value at TLC (%TLCalv) vs. percentage of lung height in supine (top) and head‐up (bottom) dogs, rabbits, and humans at FRC.

From Milic‐Emili 49


Figure 4.

Mean relationships between regional (or alveolar) and overall lung volumes in 4 seated healthy men aged 33–39 yr. Solid lines, results from 3 lung regions (4.5, 13.8, and 22.5 cm from lung top). Dotted line, predicted relationship for lowermost lung zones. Dashed line (line of identity) indicates regional (or alveolar) percentile expansion equal to overall lung expansion.

From Sutherland, Katsura, and Milic‐Emili 69


Figure 5.

Regional volumes from Fig. 4 vs. corresponding regional static transpulmonary pressures. Upper, middle, and lower lung regions are 4.5, 13.8, and 22.5 cm, respectively, from lung top. Po, opening airway pressure; Pc, closing airway pressure; TGVr, regional trapped‐gas volume.

From Sutherland, Katsura, and Milic‐Emili 69


Figure 6.

Alveolar air volume‐to‐surface ratio (V:S) of in situ subpleural alveoli of rabbits as function of corresponding transpulmonary pressure (P) in various sites and conditions; V:S expressed as percentage of that found on same isolated lobe at TLC. Dashed curves, relationships of V:S vs. P in isolated lobes of rabbits; dotted lines, SE. Points that do not fit statistically the relationship of V:S vs. P in isolated lobes are indicated by arrows for 2nd intercostal space of head‐up rabbits at FRC (top) and 4th intercostal space at 90% of lung height of supine eviscerated rabbits with tungsten beads in airways (bottom). Note small difference in relationships of V:S vs. P between upper and lower lobes. Palv, alveolar pressure; Pab, abdominal pressure.

From D'Angelo 18


Figure 7.

Vertical distribution of pleural surface pressure needed to account for regional distribution of gas measured at FRC in the 4 seated men of Fig. 4. Predictions were made with data from Figs. 4 and 5, using the method of Milic‐Emili et al. 51. Points (○, •) indicate values obtained in 3 lung regions of Fig. 4.

From Milic‐Emili 49


Figure 8.

Effect of vertical gradient of pleural surface pressure on static distribution of gas within the lung during deflation. Static PV curve was taken from Fig. 5. Intrinsic static mechanical properties of the lungs are assumed to be uniform. Values of pleural surface pressure at apex and base obtained at 3 lung volumes (RV, FRC, and TLC) computed with the assumption that gradient does not change with lung volume. At full inspiration (C) all regions are expanded virtually uniformly despite pleural surface pressure differences down lung, but at RV (A) and FRC (B) pleural surface pressure gradient causes upper regions to be more expanded than lower regions.

From Milic‐Emili 49


Figure 9.

Effect of vertical gradient of pleural surface pressure on distribution of tidal ventilation. At the beginning of lung inflation from FRC, lower regions are operating on steeper part of compliance curve of lungs than upper regions (B). Accordingly, during slow inspiration from FRC, ventilation is greater in lower lung regions (arrows). At RV (A), pleural surface pressure at lung bottom is positive (+4.8 cmH2O) and lower airways are closed. Consequently, at the beginning of slow inspiration from RV, lower lung regions are not ventilated and lung top is preferentially ventilated (arrows).

From Milic‐Emili 49


Figure 10.

Distribution of gas in normal lung (A) and hypothetical lung in which surface tension is abolished (B). Static PV curve of lung in latter condition (B) should correspond to that obtained in saline‐filled lungs (broken line). When surface tension is abolished, lung apex is almost fully expanded at transpulmonary pressure of 8.5 cmH2O, so that during inspiration (when there is a further increase in transpulmonary pressure), ventilation at apex is virtually nil.

From Milic‐Emili et al. 52
References
 1. Agostoni, E. Mechanics of the pleural space. Physiol. Rev. 52: 57–128, 1972.
 2. agostoni, E. Transpulmonary pressure. In: Regional Differences in the Lung, edited by J. B. West New York: Academic, 1977, p. 245–280.
 3. Agostoni, E., and E. D'Angelo. Topography of pleural surface pressure during simulation of gravity effect on abdomen. Respir. Physiol. 12: 102–109, 1971.
 4. Agostoni, E., E. D'Angelo, and M. V. Bonanni. The effect of the abdomen on the vertical gradient of pleural surface pressure. Respir. Physiol. 8: 332–346, 1970.
 5. Agostoni, E., F. F. Thimm, and W. O. Fenn. Comparative features of the mechanics of breathing. J. Appl. Physiol. 14: 679–683, 1959.
 6. Anthonisen, N. R. Closing volume. In: Regional Differences in the Lung, edited by J. B. West New York: Academic, 1977, p. 451–482.
 7. Anthonisen, N. R., and J. Milic‐Emili. Distribution of pulmonary perfusion in erect man. J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 760–766, 1966.
 8. Anthonisen, N. R., P. C. Robertson, and W. R. D. Ross. Gravity‐dependent sequential emptying of lung regions. J. Appl. Physiol. 28: 589–595, 1970.
 9. Bake, B., J. Bjure, G. Grimby, J. Milic‐Emili, and N. J. Nilsson. Regional distribution of inspired gas in supine man. Scand. J. Respir. Dis. 48: 189–196, 1967.
 10. Bake, B., L. Wood, B. Murphy, P. T. Macklem, and J. Milic‐Emili. Effect of inspiratory flow rate on regional distribution of inspired gas. J. Appl. Physiol. 37: 8–17, 1974.
 11. Ball, C. W., Jr., P. Stewart, B. Newsham, and D. V. Bates. Regional pulmonary function studied with xenon133. J. Clin. Invest. 41: 519–531, 1962.
 12. Berend, N., C. Skoog, and W. M. Thurlbeck. Lobar pressure‐volume characteristics of excised human lungs. Thorax 36: 290–295, 1981.
 13. Bryan, A. C., J. Milic‐Emili, and D. Pengelly. Effect of gravity on the distribution of pulmonary ventilation. J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 778–784, 1966.
 14. Burger, E. J., Jr., and P. T. Macklem. Airway closure: demonstration by breathing 100% O2 at low lung volumes and by N2 washout. J. Appl. Physiol. 25: 139–148, 1968.
 15. Chang, H. K., and A. van Grondelle. Role of applied pleural pressure in ventilation distribution during cyclic breathing. In: Progress in Respiration Research. Gas Exchange Function of Normal and Diseased Lungs, edited by J. Piiper and P. Scheid Basel: Karger, 1981, vol. 16, p. 50–53.
 16. Colebatch, H. J. H., I. A. Greaves, and C. K. Y. Ng. Exponential analysis of elastic recoil and aging in healthy males and females. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 47: 683–691, 1979.
 17. Connolly, T., B. Bake, L. Wood, and J. Milic‐Emili. Regional distribution of a 133Xe labelled gas volume inspired at constant flow rates. Scand. J. Respir. Dis. 56: 150–159, 1975.
 18. D'Angelo, E. Local alveolar size and transpulmonary pressure in situ and in isolated lungs. Respir. Physiol. 14: 251–266, 1972.
 19. D'angelo, E. Effect of papain‐induced emphysema on the distribution of pleural surface pressure. Respir. Physiol. 27: 1–20, 1976.
 20. D'Angelo, E., and G. Sant'Ambrogio. Direct action of contracting diaphragm on the rib cage in rabbits and dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 36: 715–719, 1974.
 21. Demets, M. Regional Distributions of Lung Volumes, Ventilation and Transpulmonary Pressure. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic Univ. of Leuven, 1978.
 22. Dollfuss, R. E., J. Milic‐Emili, and D. V. Bates. Regional ventilation of the lung studied with boluses of 133Xenon. Respir. Physiol. 2: 234–246, 1967.
 23. Dunnill, M. D. Effect of lung inflation on alveolar surface area in the dog. Nature London 214: 1013–1014, 1967.
 24. Engel, L. A., A. Grassino, and N. R. Anthonisen. Demonstration of airway closure in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 38: 1117–1125, 1975.
 25. Engel, L. A., L. Landau, L. Taussig, R. R. Martin, and G. Sybrecht. Influence of bronchomotor tone on regional ventilation distribution at residual volume. J. Appl. Physiol. 40: 411–416, 1976.
 26. Engel, L. A., and P. T. Macklem. Gas mixing and distribution in the lung. In: Respiratory Physiology II, edited by J. G. Widdicombe Baltimore, MD: University Park, 1977, vol. 14, pt. 2, p. 37–82. (Int. Rev. Physiol. Ser.).
 27. Faridy, E. E., R. Kidd, and J. Milic‐Emili. Topographical distribution of inspired gas in excised lobes of dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 22: 760–766, 1967.
 28. Forrest, J. B. The effect of changes in lung volume on the size and shape of alveoli. J. Physiol. London 210: 533–547, 1970.
 29. Fowler, W. S. Alveolar ventilation of individual pulmonary lobes in various postures. Am. J. Med. Sci. 222: 602–603, 1951.
 30. Frank, N. R. A comparison of static volume‐pressure relations of excised pulmonary lobes of dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 18: 274–278, 1963.
 31. Glaister, D. H., R. C. Schroter, M. F. Sudlow, and J. Milic‐Emili. Bulk elastic properties of excised lungs and the effect of a transpulmonary pressure gradient. Respir. Physiol. 17: 347–364, 1973.
 32. Glaister, D. H., R. C. Schroter, M. F. Sudlow, and J. Milic‐Emili. Transpulmonary pressure gradient and ventilation distribution in excised lungs. Respir. Physiol. 17: 365–385, 1973.
 33. Glazier, J. B., J. M. B. Hughes, J. E. Maloney, and J. B. West. Vertical gradient of alveolar size in lungs of dogs frozen intact. J. Appl. Physiol. 23: 694–705, 1967.
 34. Grassino, A. E., and N. R. Anthonisen. Chest wall distortion and regional lung volume distribution in erect humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 39: 1004–1007, 1975.
 35. Grassino, A. E., B. Bake, R. R. Martin, and N. R. Anthonisen. Voluntary changes of thoracoabdominal shape and regional lung volumes in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 39: 997–1003, 1975.
 36. Greene, R., J. M. B. Hughes, M. F. Sudlow, and J. Milic‐Emili. Regional lung volumes during water immersion to the xiphoid in seated man. J. Appl. Physiol. 36: 734–736, 1974.
 37. Hogg, J. C., and S. Nepszy. Regional lung volume and pleural pressure gradient estimated from lung density in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 198–203, 1969.
 38. Holland, J., J. Milic‐Emili, P. T. Macklem, and D. V. Bates. Regional distribution of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion in elderly subjects. J. Clin. Invest. 47: 81–92, 1968.
 39. Kaneko, K., J. Milic‐Emili, M. B. Dolovich, A. Dawson, and D. V. Bates. Regional distribution of ventilation and perfusion as a function of body position. J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 767–777, 1966.
 40. Klingele, T. G., and N. C. Staub. Alveolar shape changes with volume in isolated, air‐filled lobes of cat lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 28: 411–414, 1970.
 41. Knipping, H. von, W. Bolt, H. Venrath, H. Valentin, H. Ludes, and P. Endler. Eine neue Methode zur Prüfung der Herz‐ und Lugenfunktion. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 80: 1146–1147, 1955.
 42. Leith, D. E., and J. Mead. Mechanisms determining residual volume of the lungs in normal subjects. J. Appl. Physiol. 23: 221–227, 1967.
 43. Lemelin, J., W. R. D. Ross, R. R. Martin, and N. R. Anthonisen. Regional lung volumes with positive pressure inflation in erect humans. Respir. Physiol. 16: 273–281, 1972.
 44. Lupi‐Herrera, E., C. Prefaut, A. E. Grassino, and N. R. Anthonisen. Effect of negative abdominal pressure on regional lung volumes in supine dogs. Respir. Physiol. 26: 213–221, 1976.
 45. Martin, C. J., F. Cline, Jr., and H. Marshall. Lobar alveolar gas concentrations; effect of body position. J. Clin. Invest. 32: 617–621, 1953.
 46. Martin, C. J., and A. C. Young. Lobar ventilation in man. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 73: 330–337, 1956.
 47. Mattson, S. B., and E. Carlens. Lobar ventilation and oxygen uptake in man. J. Thorac. Surg. 30: 676–682, 1955.
 48. Michels, D. B., P. J. Friedman, and J. B. West. Radiographic comparison of human lung shape during normal gravity and weightlessness. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 47: 851–857, 1979.
 49. Milic‐Emili, J. Radioactive xenon in the evaluation of regional lung function. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1: 246–262, 1971.
 50. Milic‐Emili, J. Pulmonary statics. In: Respiratory Physiology I, edited by J. G. Widdicombe Baltimore, MD: University Park, 1974, vol. 2, p. 105–137. (Int. Rev. Physiol. Ser.).
 51. Milic‐Emili, J. Ventilation. In: Regional Differences in the Lung, edited by J. B. West New York: Academic, 1977, p. 167–199.
 52. Milic‐Emili, J., J. A. M. Henderson, M. B. Dolovich, D. Trop, and K. Kaneko. Regional distribution of inspired gas in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 749–759, 1966.
 53. Milic‐Emili, J., J. A. M. Henderson, and K. Kaneko. Regional distribution of pulmonary ventilation. In: Form and Function in the Human Lung, edited by G. Cumming and L. B. Hunt Edinburgh: Livingstone, 1968, p. 66–75.
 54. Milic‐Emili, J., J. Mead, and J. M. Turner. Topography of esophageal pressure as a function of posture in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 212–216, 1964.
 55. Milic‐Emili, J., J. Mead, J. M. Turner, and E. M. Glauser. Improved technique for estimating pleural pressure from esophageal balloons. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 207–211, 1964.
 56. Millette, B., P. C. Robertson, W. R. D. Ross, and N. R. Anthonisen. Effect of expiratory flow rate on emptying of lung regions. J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 587–591, 1969.
 57. Miörner, G. 133Xe‐radiospirometry. A clinical method for studying regional lung function. Scand. J. Respir. Dis. Suppl. 64: 1–84, 1968.
 58. Paré, P. D., R. Boucher, M.‐C. Michoud, and J. C. Hogg. Static lung mechanics of intact and excised rhesus monkey lungs and lobes. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 44: 547–552, 1978.
 59. Parodi, F. La mécanique pulmonaire. Paris: Masson, 1933.
 60. Radford, E. P., Jr. Static mechanical properties of mammalian lungs. In: Handbook of Physiology. Respiration, edited by W. O. Fenn and H. Rahn Washington, DC: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1964, sect. 3, vol. I, chapt. 15, p. 429–449.
 61. Rahn, H., P. Sadoul, L. E. Farhi, and J. Shapiro. Distribution of ventilation and perfusion in the lobes of the dog's lung in the supine and erect position. J. Appl. Physiol. 8: 417–426, 1956.
 62. Rehder, K., A. D. Sessler, and J. R. Rodarte. Regional intrapulmonary gas distribution in awake and anesthetized‐paralyzed man. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 42: 391–402, 1977.
 63. Robertson, P. C., N. R. Anthonisen, and D. Ross. Effect of inspiratory flow rate on regional distribution of inspired gas. J. Appl. Physiol. 26: 438–443, 1969.
 64. Rodarte, J. R., L. W. Burgher, R. E. Hyatt, and K. Rehder. Lung recoil and gas trapping during oxygen breathing at low lung volumes. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 43: 138–143, 1977.
 65. Roussos, C. S., M. Fixley, J. Genest, M. Cosio, S. Kelly, R. R. Martin, and L. A. Engel. Voluntary factors influencing the distribution of inspired gas. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 116: 457–467, 1977.
 66. Roussos, C. S., Y. Fukuchi, P. T. Macklem, and L. A. Engel. Influence of diaphragmatic contraction on ventilation distribution in horizontal man. J. Appl. Physiol. 40: 417–424, 1976.
 67. Roussos, C. S., R. R. Martin, and L. A. Engel. Diaphragmatic contraction and the gradient of alveolar expansion in the lateral posture. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 43: 32–38, 1977.
 68. Ruff, F., R. R. Martin, and J. Milic‐Emili. Previous volume history of the lung and regional distribution of residual volume. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 51: 313–320, 1981.
 69. Salazar, E., and J. H. Knowles. An analysis of pressure‐volume characteristics of the lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 97–104, 1964.
 70. Sutherland, P. W., T. Katsura, and J. Milic‐Emili. Previous volume history of the lung and regional distribution of gas. J. Appl. Physiol. 25: 566–574, 1968.
 71. Svanberg, L. Influence of posture on the lung volumes, ventilation and circulation in normals. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 25: 1–195, 1957.
 72. Sybrecht, G., L. Landau, B. G. Murphy, L. A. Engel, R. R. Martin, and P. T. Macklem. Influence of posture on flow dependence of distribution of inhaled 133Xe boli. J. Appl. Physiol. 41: 489–496, 1976.
 73. Vawter, D. L., F. L. Matthews, and J. B. West. Effect of shape and size of lung and chest wall on stresses in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 39: 9–17, 1975.
 74. West, J. B. Radioactive methods. In: Regional Differences in the Lung, edited by J. B. West New York: Academic, 1977, p. 33–84.
 75. West, J. B., and F. L. Matthews. Stresses, strains, and surface pressures in the lung caused by its weight. J. Appl. Physiol. 32: 332–345, 1972.
 76. Young, A. C., and C. J. Martin. The sequence of lobar emptying in man. Respir. Physiol. 1: 372–381, 1966.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

J. Milic‐Emili. Static Distribution of Lung Volumes. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 12: Handbook of Physiology, The Respiratory System, Mechanics of Breathing: 561-574. First published in print 1986. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp030331