Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Respiratory System in Microgravity

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Topographical Differences of Pulmonary Structure and Function
1.1 Normal Gravity
1.2 Effect of Short Periods of Microgravity
1.3 Effect of Sustained Microgravity
1.4 Nongravitational Inequality of Ventilation and Bloodflow
2 Mechanics of Lung and Chest Wall
2.1 Lung Volume and Chest Wall Configuration
2.2 Flow‐volume Curves
3 Pulmonary Bloodflow and Blood Volume
4 Pulmonary Retention of Inhaled Aerosol
5 Nitrogen Washout for Extravehicular Activity
6 Spacecraft Atmosphere
Figure 1. Figure 1.

Regional difference of pulmonary structure and function caused by gravity. Presumably these will be reduced in microgravity.

Figure 2. Figure 2.

Effect of +Gz acceleration on the distribution of pulmonary bloodflow obtained using 133‐xenon. The acceleration vector is vertically downward as in a tight turn in a high performance aircraft. Note that at +2G and +3G, substantial amounts of the upper lung were unperfused.

From Glaister 19 with permission
Figure 3. Figure 3.

Single‐breath nitrogen washouts showing the effect of a short period of microgravity as obtained in parabolic flight. The washouts follow a vital capacity inspiration of pure oxygen with a bolus of argon added at the beginning. Note that the tracings at 1G showed prominent cardiogenic oscillations and terminal rises indicating topographical inequality of ventilation. These were greatly reduced when the test inspiration was made at 0G.

From Michels and West 35 with permission
Figure 4. Figure 4.

A: effect of short periods of 0G, 1G, and 2G on the inhomogeneity of pulmonary bloodflow. The inequality was determined from the height of the cardiogenic oscillations in exhaled O2 and CO2 following a brief hyperventilation and 15 s breath‐hold at total lung capacity (see text). The insets show part of the alveolar plateau at increased gain to illustrate the cardiogenic oscillations more clearly. Note the marked reduction in the oscillations at 0G indicating a more uniform topographical distribution of bloodflow. B: heights of the cardiogenic oscillations at the 3 different G levels.

From Michels and West 35 with permission
Figure 5. Figure 5.

Effect of sustained microgravity on the inhomogeneity of ventilation measured in Spacelab SLS‐1. Note the reduction in size of the cardiogenic oscillations of both nitrogen and argon indicating a more uniform distribution of ventilation. However, considerable inequality remained. Also note that the volume of phase 4 as measured with argon was unchanged. Compare with Figure 3.

From Guy et al. 22 with permission
Figure 6. Figure 6.

Effect of sustained microgravity on the inhomogeneity of bloodflow measured in Spacelab SLS‐1. The reduction in the cardiogenic oscillations indicated a more uniform distribution of bloodflow, but considerable inequality remained. Compare with Figure 4.

From Prisk et al. 44 with permission
Figure 7. Figure 7.

A: changes in functional residual capacity (FRC,) and end‐expiratory thoraco–abdominal volume (Vw). Bars show standard errors. Note the almost equal decline of both variables at 0G. B: change in end‐expiratory rib cage (Vrc) and abdominal (Vab) volumes at different G levels. Note the substantial fall in abdominal volume at 0G.

From Paiva et al. 40 with permission
Figure 8. Figure 8.

Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide measured preflight, on flight days 2, 4, and 9, and on days 0, 1 or 2, 4, and 6 after return to 1G. Data are normalized to the preflight standing value; bars indicate standard errors. Note the increase in diffusing capacity during flight and the postflight return to preflight values.

From Prisk et al. 43 with permission
Figure 9. Figure 9.

Percentage increase in pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc) and membrane diffusing capacity (DM) in the transitions from the preflight standing to supine postures, and preflight standing to 0G. Note that while Vc increased to almost the same extent, there was a much larger rise in DM in microgravity than in the supine posture. This is thought to be caused by the more uniform filling of the pulmonary capillaries.

From Prisk et al. 43 with permission
Figure 10. Figure 10.

Cardiac output (normalized to preflight standing) measured in Spacelab SLS‐1 using the nitrous oxide rebreathing technique. Note the increase during microgravity and decrease during the week postflight. The highest value was found 24 h after the beginning of microgravity, and the lowest value on the day of return. Bars indicate SEM. Asterisk indicates P < 0.05 compared with preflight standing; + indicates P < 0.05 compared with preflight supine.

From Prisk et al. 43 with permission


Figure 1.

Regional difference of pulmonary structure and function caused by gravity. Presumably these will be reduced in microgravity.



Figure 2.

Effect of +Gz acceleration on the distribution of pulmonary bloodflow obtained using 133‐xenon. The acceleration vector is vertically downward as in a tight turn in a high performance aircraft. Note that at +2G and +3G, substantial amounts of the upper lung were unperfused.

From Glaister 19 with permission


Figure 3.

Single‐breath nitrogen washouts showing the effect of a short period of microgravity as obtained in parabolic flight. The washouts follow a vital capacity inspiration of pure oxygen with a bolus of argon added at the beginning. Note that the tracings at 1G showed prominent cardiogenic oscillations and terminal rises indicating topographical inequality of ventilation. These were greatly reduced when the test inspiration was made at 0G.

From Michels and West 35 with permission


Figure 4.

A: effect of short periods of 0G, 1G, and 2G on the inhomogeneity of pulmonary bloodflow. The inequality was determined from the height of the cardiogenic oscillations in exhaled O2 and CO2 following a brief hyperventilation and 15 s breath‐hold at total lung capacity (see text). The insets show part of the alveolar plateau at increased gain to illustrate the cardiogenic oscillations more clearly. Note the marked reduction in the oscillations at 0G indicating a more uniform topographical distribution of bloodflow. B: heights of the cardiogenic oscillations at the 3 different G levels.

From Michels and West 35 with permission


Figure 5.

Effect of sustained microgravity on the inhomogeneity of ventilation measured in Spacelab SLS‐1. Note the reduction in size of the cardiogenic oscillations of both nitrogen and argon indicating a more uniform distribution of ventilation. However, considerable inequality remained. Also note that the volume of phase 4 as measured with argon was unchanged. Compare with Figure 3.

From Guy et al. 22 with permission


Figure 6.

Effect of sustained microgravity on the inhomogeneity of bloodflow measured in Spacelab SLS‐1. The reduction in the cardiogenic oscillations indicated a more uniform distribution of bloodflow, but considerable inequality remained. Compare with Figure 4.

From Prisk et al. 44 with permission


Figure 7.

A: changes in functional residual capacity (FRC,) and end‐expiratory thoraco–abdominal volume (Vw). Bars show standard errors. Note the almost equal decline of both variables at 0G. B: change in end‐expiratory rib cage (Vrc) and abdominal (Vab) volumes at different G levels. Note the substantial fall in abdominal volume at 0G.

From Paiva et al. 40 with permission


Figure 8.

Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide measured preflight, on flight days 2, 4, and 9, and on days 0, 1 or 2, 4, and 6 after return to 1G. Data are normalized to the preflight standing value; bars indicate standard errors. Note the increase in diffusing capacity during flight and the postflight return to preflight values.

From Prisk et al. 43 with permission


Figure 9.

Percentage increase in pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc) and membrane diffusing capacity (DM) in the transitions from the preflight standing to supine postures, and preflight standing to 0G. Note that while Vc increased to almost the same extent, there was a much larger rise in DM in microgravity than in the supine posture. This is thought to be caused by the more uniform filling of the pulmonary capillaries.

From Prisk et al. 43 with permission


Figure 10.

Cardiac output (normalized to preflight standing) measured in Spacelab SLS‐1 using the nitrous oxide rebreathing technique. Note the increase during microgravity and decrease during the week postflight. The highest value was found 24 h after the beginning of microgravity, and the lowest value on the day of return. Bars indicate SEM. Asterisk indicates P < 0.05 compared with preflight standing; + indicates P < 0.05 compared with preflight supine.

From Prisk et al. 43 with permission
References
 1. Agostoni, E., Transpulmonary pressure. In: Regional Differences in the Lung, edited by J. B. West. New York: Academic, 1977.
 2. Agostoni, E., and J. Mead. Statics of the respiratory system. In: Handbook of Physiology. Respiration, edited by H. Rahn. Washington, D. C: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1964, sect. 3, vol I, p. 387–409.
 3. Arieli, R., J. Olszowka, and H. D. Van Liew. Postinspiratory mixing in the lung and cardiogenic oscillations. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 51: 922–928, 1981.
 4. Ayotte, B., J. Seymour, and M. B. McIlroy. A new method for measurement of cardiac output with nitrous oxide. J. Appl. Physiol. 28: 863–866, 1970.
 5. Bake, B., L. Wood, B. Murphy, P. T. Macklem, and J. Milic‐Emili. Effect of inspiratory flow rate on regional distribution of inspired gas. J. Appl. Physiol. 37: 8–17, 1974.
 6. Beck, K. C., and K. Rehder. Differences in regional vascular conductances in isolated dog lungs. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 61: 530–538, 1986.
 7. Blomqvist, C. G., and H. L. Stone. Cardiovascular responses to gravitational stress. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System, edited by J. T. Shepherd and F. M. Abboud. Bethesda MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1983, sect. 2, vol III.
 8. Castile, R., J. Mead, A. Jackson, M. E. Wohl, and D. Stokes. Effects of posture on flow‐volume curve configuration in normal humans. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 53: 1175–1183, 1982.
 9. Cumming, G., K. Horsfield, and S. B. Preston. Diffusion equilibrium in the lungs examined by nodal analysis. Respir. Physiol. 12: 329–345, 1971.
 10. D'Angelo, E., Local alveolar size and transpulmonary pressure in situ and in isolated lungs. Respir. Physiol. 14: 251–266, 1972.
 11. Edyvean, J., M. Estenne, M. Paiva, and L. A. Engel. Lung and chest wall mechanics in microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 71: 1956–1966, 1991.
 12. Elliott, A. R., G. K. Prisk, H. J. B. Guy, and J. B. West. Lung volumes during sustained microgravity on Spacelab SLS‐1, J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 77: 2005–2014, 1994.
 13. Engel, L. A., and M. Paiva. Analyses of sequential filling and emptying of the lung. Respir. Physiol. 45: 309–321, 1981.
 14. Ewan, P. W., H. A. Jones, J. Nosil, J. Obdrzalek, and J. M. B. Hughes. Uneven perfusion and ventilation within lung regions studied with nitrogen‐13. Respir. Physiol. 34: 45–59, 1978.
 15. Faridy, E. E., R. Kidd, and J. Milic‐Emili. Topographical distribution of inspired gas in excised lobes of dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 22: 760–766, 1967.
 16. Fowler, K. T., and J. Read. Cardiac oscillations in expired gas tensions and regional pulmonary blood flow. J. Appl. Physiol. 16: 863–868, 1961.
 17. Frank, N. R., A comparison of static volume‐pressure relations of excised pulmonary lobes of dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 18: 274–278, 1963.
 18. Gazenko, O. G., A. M. Genin, and A. D. Egorov. Major medical results of the Salyut‐6‐Soyuz 195‐day space flight. Congr. Int. Astronaut Federation 32 Sess. D‐52: 1981.
 19. Glaister, D. H., Effect of acceleration. In: Regional Differences in the Lung, edited by J. B. West. New York: Academic, 1977, p. 324–379.
 20. Glazier, J. B., J. M. B. Hughes, J. E. Maloney, and J. B. West. Vertical gradient of alveolar size in lungs of dogs frozen intact. J. Appl. Physiol. 23: 694–705, 1967.
 21. Glenny, R. W. and H. T. Robertson. Fractal properties of pulmonary blood flow: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 69: 532–545, 1990.
 22. Guy, H. J. B., G. K. Prisk, A. R. Elliott, R. A. Deutschman, III, and J. B. West. Inequality of pulmonary ventilation during sustained microgravity as determined from single‐breath washouts. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 76: 1719–1729, 1994.
 23. Guy, H. J. B., G. K. Prisk, A. R. Elliott and J. B. West. Maximum expiratory flow‐volume curves during short periods of microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 70: 2587–2596, 1991.
 24. Haase, H., V. M. Baranov, N. M. Asyamolova, V. V. Polyakov, Y. G. Avakyan, R. Dannenberg, B. Jarsumbeck, and J. Konig. First results of Po2 examinations in the capillary blood of cosmonauts during a long‐term flight in the space station “MIR.” Proc. 41st Congr. Int. Astronautical Federation, Dresden, Germany 1–4, 1990.
 25. Hakim, T. S., R. Lisbona, and G. W. Dean. Gravity‐independent inequality in pulmonary blood flow in humans. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 63: 1114–1121, 1987.
 26. Henney, M. R., K. D. Kropp, and D. L. Pierson. Microbial monitoring of orbiter air [Abstract]. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 55: 466, 1984.
 27. Hoffman, R. A., and J. Billingham. Effect of altered G levels on deposition of particulates in the human respiratory tract. J. Appl. Physiol. 38: 955–960, 1975.
 28. Hogg, J. C., and S. Nepszy. Regional lung volume and pleural pressure gradient estimated from lung density in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 198–203, 1969.
 29. Hughes, J. M. B., J. B. Glazier, J. E. Maloney, and J. B. West. Effect of lung volume on the distribution of pulmonary blood flow in man. Respir. Physiol. 4: 58–72, 1968.
 30. Johnson, R. L., Hoffler, G. W., Nicogossian, A. E., Bergman, S. A., Jr., and Jackson, M. M., Lower body negative pressure: third manned Skylab mission. In: Biomedical Results from Skylab, edited by R. S. Johnston and L. R. Dietlein. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1977, p. 284–312.
 31. Johnston, R. S., and L. F. Dietlein. Biomedical results from Skylab. In: Biomedical Results from Skylab, edited by R. S. Johnston and L. F. Dietlein. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1977.
 32. Kronenberg, R. S., O. D. Wangensteen, and P. A. Ponto. Frequency dependence of regional lung clearance of 133Xe in normal men. Respir. Physiol. 27: 293–303, 1976.
 33. Krueger, J. J., T. Bain, and J. L. Patterson, Jr, Elevation gradient of intrathoracic pressure. J. Appl. Physiol. 16: 465–468, 1961.
 34. Michels, D. B., P. J. Friedman, and J. B. West. Radiographic comparison of human lung shape during normal gravity and weightlessness. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 47: 851–857, 1979.
 35. Michels, D. B., and J. B. West. Distribution of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion during short periods of weightlessness. J. Appl. Physiol: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 45: 987–998, 1978.
 36. Milic‐Emili, J., A. M. Henderson, M. B. Dolovich, D. Trop, and K. Kaneko. Regional distribution of inspired gas in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 749–759, 1966.
 37. Milic‐Emili, J. J., Mead, and J. M. Turner. Topography of esophageal pressure as a function of posture in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 212–216, 1964.
 38. Muir, D. C. F. Influence of gravitational changes on the deposition of aerosols in the lungs of man. Aerospace Med. 159–161, 1967.
 39. Nicogossian, A. E., C. L. Huntoon, and S. L. Pool. Space Physiology and Medicine (2nd ed.), Washington, D. C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1987.
 40. Paiva, M. M., Estenne, and L. A. Engel. Lung volumes, chest wall configuration, and pattern of breathing in microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol: Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 67: 1542–1550, 1989.
 41. Permutt, S., Pulmonary circulation and the distribution of blood and gas in the lungs. In: Physiology in the Space Environment. Washington, D.C.: NAS‐NRC 1485B, 1967, p. 38–56.
 42. Prefaut, C., E. Lupi‐H, and N. R. Anthonisen. Human lung mechanisms during water immersion. J. Appl. Physiol. 40: 320–323, 1976.
 43. Prisk, G. K., H. J. B. Guy, A. R. Elliott, R. A. Deutschman, III, and J. B. West. Pulmonary diffusing capacity, capillary blood volume and cardiac output during sustained microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol. 75: 15–26, 1993.
 44. Prisk, G. K., H. J. B. Guy, A. R. Elliott, R. A. Deutschman, III, and J. B. West. Inhomogeneity of pulmonary perfusion during sustained microgravity on Spacelab SLS‐1. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 1730–1738, 1994.
 45. Prisk, G. K., H. J. B. Guy, A. R. Elliott, M. Paiva, and J. B. West. Ventilatory inhomogeneity determined from multiple‐breath washouts during sustained microgravity on Spacelab SLS‐1. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 597–607, 1995.
 46. Robertson, P., N. R. Anthonisen, and D. Ross. Effect of inspiratory flow rate on regional distribution of inspired gas. J. Appl. Physiol. 26: 438–443, 1969.
 47. Roussos, C. S., R. R. Martin, and L. A. Engel. Diaphragmatic contraction and the gradient of alveolar expansion in the lateral posture. J. Appl. Physiol. 43: 32–38, 1977.
 48. Sawin, C. F., A. E. Nicogossian, J. A. Rummel, and E. L. Michel. Pulmonary function evaluation during the Skylab and Apollo‐Soyuz missions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 47: 168–172, 1976.
 49. Vawter, D. L., F. L. Matthews, and J. B. West. Effect of shape size of lung chest wall on stresses in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 39: 9–17, 1975.
 50. von Baumgarten, R. J., G. Baldrighi, H. Vogel, and R. Thumler. Physiological response to hyper‐ and hypogravity during roller‐coaster flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 51: 145–154, 1980.
 51. Wagner, P. D., J. McRae, and J. Read. Stratified distribution of blood flow in secondary lobule of the rat lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 22: 1115–1123, 1967.
 52. Warrell, D. A., J. W. Evans, R. O. Clarke, G. P. Kingaby, and J. B. West. Patterns of filling in the pulmonary capillary bed. J. Appl. Physiol. 32: 346–356, 1972.
 53. West, J. B., Regional differences in gas exchange in the lung of erect man. J. Appl. Physiol. 17: 893–898, 1962.
 54. West, J. B., Distribution of mechanical stress in the lung, a possible factor in localization of pulmonary disease. Lancet 1: 839–841, 1971.
 55. West, J. B., Regional Differences in the Lung, New York: Academic, 1977.
 56. West, J. B., and C. T. Dollery. Distribution of blood flow and ventilation‐perfusion ratio in the lung, measured with radioactive CO2. J. Appl. Physiol. 15: 405–410, 1960.
 57. West, J. B., C. T. Dollery, and A. Naimark. Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung: relation to vascular alveolar pressures. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 713–724, 1964.
 58. West, J. B., J. E. Maloney, and B. L. Castle. Effect of stratified inequality of bloodflow on gas exchange in liquid‐filling lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 32: 357–361, 1972.
 59. West, J. B., and F. L. Matthews. Stresses, strains, surface pressures in the lung caused by its weight. J. Appl. Physiol. 31: 332–345, 1972.
 60. West, J. B., A. M. Schneider, and M. M. Mitchell. Recruitment in networks of pulmonary capillaries. J. Appl. Physiol. 39: 976–984, 1975.
 61. Wetzig, J., Respiration measurements in the weightlessness of parabolic flight. In: ESTEC Working Paper 1457, edited by D. Frimond, A. Confalone and V. Pletser. Noordwijk, 1986.
 62. Wetzig, J., and R. von Baumgarten. Respiratory parameters aboard an aircraft performing parabolic flights. Proc. 3rd Eur. Sytnp. Life Sci. Res. Space, Graz, Austria, September 14–18, 1987, p. 47–50. (ESA SP‐271)

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

John B. West, Harold J. B. Guy, Ann R. Elliott, G. Kim Prisk. Respiratory System in Microgravity. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 14: Handbook of Physiology, Environmental Physiology: 675-689. First published in print 1996. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp040130