Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Motor Unit

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

Movement is accomplished by the controlled activation of motor unit populations. Our understanding of motor unit physiology has been derived from experimental work on the properties of single motor units and from computational studies that have integrated the experimental observations into the function of motor unit populations. The article provides brief descriptions of motor unit anatomy and muscle unit properties, with more substantial reviews of motoneuron properties, motor unit recruitment and rate modulation when humans perform voluntary contractions, and the function of an entire motor unit pool. The article emphasizes the advances in knowledge on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the neuromodulation of motoneuron activity and attempts to explain the discharge characteristics of human motor units in terms of these principles. A major finding from this work has been the critical role of descending pathways from the brainstem in modulating the properties and activity of spinal motoneurons. Progress has been substantial, but significant gaps in knowledge remain. © 2012 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 2:2629‐2682, 2012.

Comprehensive Physiology offers downloadable PowerPoint presentations of figures for non-profit, educational use, provided the content is not modified and full credit is given to the author and publication.

Download a PowerPoint presentation of all images


Figure 1. Figure 1.

The motor output system of the S1 segment of a 9‐day‐old mouse. This is a two photon image of intracellular calcium in live motoneurons. The motoneurons were loaded retrogradely with a calcium dye via the S1 ventral root. The view is from above, with the lateral margin of the cord along the bottom of the figure (see orientiation arrows). A significant portion of the ventral root is apparent in the lower left part of the image; the motoneurons lie along the lateral edge of the ventral cord. Note the range in size of cell bodies and the numerous dendritic branches. Unpublished results from Mingchen Jiang, Shuaib Ahmed, and CJ Heckman. Figure prepared, with permission, by Rochelle Bright.

Figure 2. Figure 2.

Muscle unit territories in the human sartorius muscle. (A) Arrangement of recording electrodes (R1‐R5) along the length of the sartorius muscle. (B) End‐plate location (filled circles) and the extent of muscle length along which the potentials for single muscle units were recorded. Each vertical bar represents a single muscle unit. Adapted, with permission, from Harris et al. 293.

Figure 3. Figure 3.

Muscle unit territories in the human sartorius muscle. (A) Arrangement of recording electrodes (R1‐R5) along the length of the sartorius muscle. (B) End‐plate location (filled circles) and the extent of muscle length along which the potentials for single muscle units were recorded. Each vertical bar represents a single muscle unit. Adapted, with permission, from Harris et al. 293.

Figure 4. Figure 4.

High‐density surface electromyogram (EMG) recordings of motor unit activity in a human hand muscle. (A), surface electromyogram (EMG) signals recorded with an electrode array (5 columns × 13 rows) placed over the abductor pollicis brevis muscle of a healthy man as he sustained an isometric contraction at 10% of the maximal voluntary contraction force. The 61 electrodes were 5 mm apart and the signals were detected as bipolar recordings between adjacent electrodes. The columns were aligned with the direction of the muscle fibers. (B) Distribution of multichannel EMG amplitude at the instant indicated by the red dots and vertical lines in A. Some of the recording locations are indicated by numbers corresponding to those in A. Decomposition of the multichannel surface EMG signal identified 18 motor units, 8 of which discharged action potentials at this instant and contributed to the amplitude of the interference signal. (C) The amplitude of the action potentials for the eight motor units (MU) as detected by the array at the instant shown in B. The amplitude distribution for the interference signal (B) corresponded closely with the sum of the amplitude distributions for the eight motor units (C). The amplitude calibration (mV) refers to all amplitude maps. Adapted, with permission, from Farina et al. 217.

Figure 5. Figure 5.

Voltage sensitive channels in motoneurons can generate complex effects. [(A), (B)] The dynamics of the H‐current induce a resonance in motoneuron subthreshold behavior. A shows the voltage response of the neuron (upper trace) to an injected current of steadily increasing frequency (lower trace). The voltage response grows and then declines. In B, the resulting impedance versus input frequency shows a peak at about 10 Hz. Adapted, with permission, from Manuel et al. 483. (C) L‐type Ca currents have an intrinsic tendency to generate prolonged tail currents. Increasing the duration of the voltage step increases the duration of the tail current (compare red and blue traces to black). Recordings obtained in nucleated patches of membrane from hypoglossal motoneurons. Modified, with permission, from Moritz et al. 522.

Figure 6. Figure 6.

Input organization and electrical behavior of motoneurons in the base state, without significant levels of neuromodulation. (A) Summary of distribution of ionotropic synaptic currents within a motor pool. Data from a series of studies in motoneurons that innervate cat ankle extensor muscles by Powers, Binder and colleagues (reviewed in reference 579). Inputs generated by electrical stimulation of descending tracts [pyramidal (Pyr), rubrospinal (RN), vesitbulospinal (from Dieter's nucleus (RN)], ventral roots (recurrent inhibition via Renshaw cells), and tendon vibration [Ia monosynaptic excitation (Ia excit) and Ia disynaptic inhibition (Ia inhib)]. All measurements were made under steady‐state conditions. Figure modified, with permission, from reference 579). (B) Repetitive firing in response to a linearly rising injected current (control, thin trace). The thick trace indicates the response after administration of riluzole to block the NaPIC; the transient Na current remains but spiking cannot occur due to the lack of the acceleration in membrane potential due to the NaPIC (arrow on control trace). Redrawn, with permission, from the authors from data from Kuo et al. 418. (C) Summary of frequency‐current relations in S, FR, and FF motoneurons generated by linearly increasing injected currents. Based on simulations, with permission, by Heckman and Binder 305.

Figure 7. Figure 7.

Distribution of neurotransmitter serotonin (5‐HT) contacts on a cat motoneuron. Each dot indicates the presence of a synaptic bouton containing 5‐HT. Reconstruction of the cell, with permission, by Dianne Dewey. Figure created from data from Alvarez et al. 15, with permission from the authors.

Figure 8. Figure 8.

Effects of increasing Ca persistent inward current (CaPIC) amplitude on the firing produced by an excitatory synaptic input. A highly realistic motoneuron model was used to generate these results, based on a full reconstruction of a fast fatigue resistant (type FR) motoneuron with more than 700 dendritic compartments (based on references 194 and 193). The CaPIC was generated at a primarily middendritic location 89,193,269. On the left, a step increase in conductance is applied to excitatory synapses distributed throughout the dendritic tree. On the right, the same simulated synapses were activated in a triangular fashion. From the bottom up, the amplitude of the CaPIC is increased progressively, mimicking one of the main effects of increasing neuromodulatory input. Note the need for inhibitory input after the triangle of excitation to bring firing to a stop at the highest level. Simulations, with permission, by Dr. Sherif ElBasiouny.

Figure 9. Figure 9.

Current‐voltage (I‐V) and frequency current (F‐I) relations generated by triangular input waveforms in motoneurons with a steady background of neuromodulatory input. Black arrows indicate ascending and descending phases. (A) I‐V relation in a putative type S motoneuron. The persistent inward current (PIC) onset is indicated by the red arrow. (B) F‐I relation in the same type S motoneuron. The red arrow indicates the onset of the acceleration in firing due to PIC activation, which occurs right at threshold for onset of repetitive firing. Note that the hysteresis in PIC onset and offset (blue arrow) in A generates the hysteresis in firing onset and offset in B. (C) I‐V relation in a putative FF motoneuron. (D) F‐I relation in the same FF motoneuron. The lesser degree of I‐V hysteresis corresponds to lesser F‐I hysteresis. (E) I‐V relation in a rat motoneuron. (F) F‐I relation in the same rat motoneuron. As for the cat, the I‐V hysteresis produces F‐I hysteresis. [(A)‐(D)] Modified, with permission, from Lee and Heckman 437,439. [(E), (F)] Modified, with permission, from Hamm et al. 286.

Figure 10. Figure 10.

The persistent inward current (PIC) amplifies both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. (A) Amplification during repetitive firing. Lowest trace: sinusoidal muscle stretch to provide synaptic input. Next: linearly rising current injected into motoneuron to generate background firing. Upper trace: firing pattern evoked by the combined stretch and current. The strong increase in firing range in the last few cycles is due to amplification by the PIC (onset marked by green arrow). Modified, with permission, from Hultborn et al. 355. (B) Amplification of excitatory synaptic current as a function of voltage clamp holding potential. As the membrane potential is depolarized (x‐axis), synaptic current (y‐axis) increases and then decreases, demonstrating amplification and saturation. The vertical arrow indicates the approximate membrane potential at which the cell would begin spiking in unclamped conditions. The three traces show increasing levels of neuromodulatory input, low to high. Modified, with permission, from Lee and Heckman 435. (C) Computer simulation in which dendrites were depolarized by excitation alone (upper traces) and then by combined excitation and inhibition. Excitation alone activated the PIC, but inhibition sharply reduced PIC activation (red arrow). Modified, with permission, from Bui et al. 87. (D) Comparison of excitatory and inhibitory currents within one cell during voltage clamp at various membrane potentials. The excitatory current shows the same amplification pattern seen in B but inhibition deactivates the PIC and thus had its greatest influence in the voltage range where the PIC reaches its peak. Modified, with permission, from Hyngstrom et al. 358.

Figure 11. Figure 11.

Contractile properties of two motor units in first dorsal interosseus as estimated with spike‐triggered averaging. (A) The subject slowly increased the abduction force exerted by the index finger during an isometric contraction and the action potentials discharged by two motor units in first dorsal interosseus were detected with an intramuscular electrode. (B) The twitch forces of the two motor units (1 and 2) were estimated with spike‐triggered averaging of 512 discharge times. The time to peak force (contraction time) was 65 ms for Unit 1 and 39 ms for Unit 2. The peak forces were 2.9 and 14.7 mN, respectively. Modified, with permission, from Desmedt and Godaux 164.

Figure 12. Figure 12.

Contractile properties of 528 motor units in tibialis anterior as estimated with spike‐triggered averaging. (A) Histogram of twitch torques. (B) Relation between twitch torque and recruitment threshold for 40 motor units from a single individual. The linear relation (y = 0.72× + 13.0, r = 0.69) was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The relation for 514 motor units was slightly weaker (r = 0.61), but still statistically significant (P < 0.001). (C) Histogram of time to peak torque. (D) The relation between time to peak torque and recruitment threshold for the 40 motor units from the same subject was not statistically significant (y = –0.09 + 47.4, r = –0.23). However, there was a slight, but statistically significant, negative relation (y = –0.11× + 44.5, r = –0.21, P < 0.001) between time to peak torque and recruitment threshold for the sample of 514 motor units. Modified, with permission, from Van Cutsem et al. 723.

Figure 13. Figure 13.

Relation between stimulus frequency and the force exerted by single motor units located in muscles that extend the toes. (A) Motor units activated by intraneural stimulation (upper trace) evoked a dorsiflexion force (lower trace). (B) Relation between stimulus frequency and normalized force (mean ± SE) for the 13 motor units. Modified, with permission, from Macefield et al. 474.

Figure 14. Figure 14.

Spike‐triggered averaging of motor unit activity. (A) The experimental arrangement developed by Stein et al. 672 to estimate the contractile properties of motor units in first dorsal interosseus during a voluntary contraction. The isolated action potential of a motor unit was used to trigger an averaging device that accumulated a running average from the net force for a few hundred milliseconds each time an event was detected. [Modified, with permission, from McComas 492 by Joel A. Enoka.] (B) Relation (r2 = 0.582) between the spike‐triggered average force and recruitment threshold force for motor units in first dorsal interosseus during a ramp contraction. Modified, with permission, from Milner‐Brown et al. 513.

Figure 15. Figure 15.

Rate modulation during ramp increases and decreases in muscle force. (A) The recruitment and derecruitment thresholds of four motor units in rectus femoris, and the extent to which discharge rate was modulated (pulses per second; pps) during ramp contractions by the knee extensor muscles. The peak force during the isometric contraction was 33% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). [Modified, with permission, from Person and Kudina 561.] (B) The instantaneous discharge rate of 42 motor units in soleus during ramp‐and‐hold isometric contractions up to MVC force. Recruitment thresholds ranged from 0.2% to 96.4% MVC force. Adapted, with permission, from Oya et al. 545.

Figure 16. Figure 16.

Motor unit activity in first dorsal interosseus during brief isometric contractions at different target forces. (A) The discharge rate of 38 motor units (each line is a different motor unit) as young adults performed the isometric contractions (∼6 s) at approximately ten target forces with each motor unit. The target forces corresponded to an abduction force exerted by the index finger. The lower limit of each line indicates the minimal target forces at which the motor unit discharged action potentials repetitively. Twelve of the 38 motor units exhibited a clear plateau in discharge rate. (B) The experimental data were used to modify the Fuglevand model of motor unit recruitment and rate modulation 243 and the simulated data were compared with experimental measurements of the coefficient of variation for force across the operating range of the muscle [2‐95% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force]. The output of the model was indistinguishable from the experimental measurements and the graph shows the corresponding motor unit activity at each target force. Modified, with permission, from Moritz et al. 524.

Figure 17. Figure 17.

Influence of contraction speed on the activity of motor units in tibialis anterior. (A) The recruitment thresholds of three motor units (indicated by different colors) when the force increased linearly to 120 N in 0.4, 1.2, 2.3, 5.0, and 10.0 s. The target force was approximately 50% maximal voluntary contraction. The recruitment thresholds were close to zero when the time to the target was less than 0.15 s. The decrease in recruitment threshold was greatest for the motor unit with the highest threshold. (B) The increase in discharge for one motor unit when the task was to reach the target in 1 s (yellow), 5 s (purple), and 10 s (green). Based on data, with permission, from Desmedt and Godaux 165.

Figure 18. Figure 18.

Comparison of ballistic contractions performed with the dorsiflexor muscles before and after 12 weeks of training. (A) The torque (a) and rectified electromyogram (EMG) for tibialis anterior (B) produced by one individual during the submaximal isometric contractions. The peak torque for both traces was approximately 40% maximal voluntary contraction, but the rate of torque development was greater after training. The recruitment thresholds were close to zero when the time to the target was less than 0.15 s. The decrease in recruitment threshold was greatest for the motor unit with the highest threshold. (B) Schematic representation of the changes in dorsiflexion torque and the discharge rate of motor units in tibialis anterior (B and C). Training increased the instantaneous discharge rate (B) and the incidence of double discharges (C). Modified, with permission, from Van Cutsem et al. 722.

Figure 19. Figure 19.

Discharge characteristics of human biceps brachii motor units when recruited during a sustained isometric contraction. Left, representative trains of action potentials for a motor unit in an young human when the target force was set at a small [∼5% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC); blue] and large (∼10% MVC; red) difference below the recruitment threshold force of the motor unit. Right, similar recordings for a biceps brachii motor unit in an old human. Modified, with permission, from Pascoe et al. 524.

Figure 20. Figure 20.

The paired motor unit technique to estimate the contribution of persistent inward currents (PICs) to motor unit discharge. (A) Slow ramp increase and decrease in force exerted by the elbow flexor muscles. (B) The modulation of discharge rate for two motor units that were recruited during the task. The motor unit with the lower recruitment threshold, indicated as the reporter unit, provides an estimate of the synaptic drive received by the two motor units. Dashed vertical lines denote the recruitment and derecruitment thresholds of the test motor unit so that the difference in the discharge rate of the reporter unit (delta discharge frequency; ΔF) at these two instances can be determined to provide an index of the amplitude of the PIC during the ramp contractions. Modified, with permission, from Mottram et al. 526.

Figure 21. Figure 21.

The range of motoneuron electrical behaviors is very wide. (A) Influence of the level of neuromodulation (low, medium, and high) on net input‐output gain of a pool of motor units. Computer simulations based on Heckman and Binder 305,307. The arrow indicates the approximate sum of synaptic currents from the excitatory synaptic input systems illustrated in Figure 5A. The simulations included increased persistent inward currents (PICs), depolarized rest potentials and decreased spike thresholds. (B) One motoneuron exhibiting two very different electrical behaviors, depending on motor task. The cell was initially depolarized during scratching, possibly activating a PIC, but then onset of strong inhibition (red arrow) eliminated the influence of the PIC. Once a new baseline was established, the oscillation of the scratch began. In the same cell, an irritating stimulus to the opposite side of the body evoked a weight support response with a sustained plateau (presumably PIC driven) with only minor oscillations. Input conductance during scratch was much greater than during weight support. Modified, with permission, from Perreault 557.

Figure 22. Figure 22.

The PIC can generate saturation in firing rate. (A) In a cat extensor motoneuron, linear stretch of an extensor muscle (lower panel) produces a linear increase in synaptic current when the cell is held hyperpolarized to prevent persistent inward current (PIC) activation (thin trace, upper left panel). When the voltage clamp holding potential was depolarized to the approximate voltage at which spikes would be initiated in unclamped conditions (thick trace, upper left), the PIC amplifies (green arrow) and then saturates (red arrow) the input. (B) The firing response in the same cell to the same linear stretch, resulting in firing rate acceleration (green arrow) and rate limiting (red arrow). Data in A and B taken, with permission, from Lee et al. 446. (C) Firing pattern of a human biceps motor unit (upper panel) in response to a voluntary effort to linearly increase elbow flexion torque (bottom panel). Note the similarity to the firing pattern in the cat motoneuron in B. Data provided by Carol Mottram, with permission, from the database of reference 526.

Figure 23. Figure 23.

Plasticity in motor output to chronic spinal injury. Column (A) Upper panel: testing of tail spasticity in a rat with chronic injury at the S1 level. Note the electromyogram (EMG) recording in the tail muscle (records illustrated in column B). The two images below indicate the level of neurotransmitter serotonin (5‐HT) in the rat spinal cord before and after chronic spinal injury. The “mn” in the upper image indicates the cell body of a motoneuron. The arrow in the bottom image indicates a 5‐HT containing fiber, which is rare postinjury. Column (B) tail muscle electromyograms (EMGs) recorded in response to electrical stimulation to the tip of the tail (see A, top). This brief stimulus evokes a long‐lasting reflex (LLR), which is generated mainly by motoneuron persistent inward currents. Addition of an antagonist (SB242084) to block binding of 5‐HT has no significant effect (middle EMG, blue). In contrast, an inverse agonist (SB206553), which blocks constitutive 5‐HT receptor activity, greatly reduces the LLR (red). Modified, with permission, from Murray et al. 530.

Figure 24. Figure 24.

Plasticity following peripheral nerve reinnervation. (A) Illustration of the paradigm to study recovery from chronic peripheral nerve injury. Intracellular recording in a motoneuron (in ventral spinal cord, left) is used to record the responses to either electrical stimulation of the muscle nerve 1 or muscle stretch 2. (B) EPSPs generated by electrical stimulation (left column) and muscle stretch (right column). Note that some motoneurons (e.g., MN2) respond to electrical stimulation but not stretch, indicating the peripheral reinnervation of the stretch receptor in muscle has failed. Also, the response to electrical stimulation is weaker than in control (e.g., MN1). As a result, the stretch reflex does not recover. Modified, with permission, from Alvarez et al. 14.

Figure 25. Figure 25.

Dramatic changes in motoneuron morphology in response to injury and disease. (A) Prolonged axotomy of adult cat motoneurons induces conversion of dendrites to axons, especially in the distal regions. The cell on the left is normal. The one on the right has undergone prolonged axotomy. The distal extensions from the dendrites, such as those into the white matter at the left, have converted to an axon‐like phenotype and exhibit significant myelination. Provided by Ken Rose from the databank of cells stained by Rose and McDermid (see also reference 469 and 470). (B) Increased dendritic branching in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A normal motoneuron is illustrated on the left, while the cell on the right is from a mutant SOD1 animal. In both cases, the animals were less than 10 days old, so these profound anatomical changes occur long before symptom onset. Different colors indicate the multiple branches originating from primary trunks extending from different parts of the soma. Modified, with permission, from Amendola and Durand 16.



Figure 1.

The motor output system of the S1 segment of a 9‐day‐old mouse. This is a two photon image of intracellular calcium in live motoneurons. The motoneurons were loaded retrogradely with a calcium dye via the S1 ventral root. The view is from above, with the lateral margin of the cord along the bottom of the figure (see orientiation arrows). A significant portion of the ventral root is apparent in the lower left part of the image; the motoneurons lie along the lateral edge of the ventral cord. Note the range in size of cell bodies and the numerous dendritic branches. Unpublished results from Mingchen Jiang, Shuaib Ahmed, and CJ Heckman. Figure prepared, with permission, by Rochelle Bright.



Figure 2.

Muscle unit territories in the human sartorius muscle. (A) Arrangement of recording electrodes (R1‐R5) along the length of the sartorius muscle. (B) End‐plate location (filled circles) and the extent of muscle length along which the potentials for single muscle units were recorded. Each vertical bar represents a single muscle unit. Adapted, with permission, from Harris et al. 293.



Figure 3.

Muscle unit territories in the human sartorius muscle. (A) Arrangement of recording electrodes (R1‐R5) along the length of the sartorius muscle. (B) End‐plate location (filled circles) and the extent of muscle length along which the potentials for single muscle units were recorded. Each vertical bar represents a single muscle unit. Adapted, with permission, from Harris et al. 293.



Figure 4.

High‐density surface electromyogram (EMG) recordings of motor unit activity in a human hand muscle. (A), surface electromyogram (EMG) signals recorded with an electrode array (5 columns × 13 rows) placed over the abductor pollicis brevis muscle of a healthy man as he sustained an isometric contraction at 10% of the maximal voluntary contraction force. The 61 electrodes were 5 mm apart and the signals were detected as bipolar recordings between adjacent electrodes. The columns were aligned with the direction of the muscle fibers. (B) Distribution of multichannel EMG amplitude at the instant indicated by the red dots and vertical lines in A. Some of the recording locations are indicated by numbers corresponding to those in A. Decomposition of the multichannel surface EMG signal identified 18 motor units, 8 of which discharged action potentials at this instant and contributed to the amplitude of the interference signal. (C) The amplitude of the action potentials for the eight motor units (MU) as detected by the array at the instant shown in B. The amplitude distribution for the interference signal (B) corresponded closely with the sum of the amplitude distributions for the eight motor units (C). The amplitude calibration (mV) refers to all amplitude maps. Adapted, with permission, from Farina et al. 217.



Figure 5.

Voltage sensitive channels in motoneurons can generate complex effects. [(A), (B)] The dynamics of the H‐current induce a resonance in motoneuron subthreshold behavior. A shows the voltage response of the neuron (upper trace) to an injected current of steadily increasing frequency (lower trace). The voltage response grows and then declines. In B, the resulting impedance versus input frequency shows a peak at about 10 Hz. Adapted, with permission, from Manuel et al. 483. (C) L‐type Ca currents have an intrinsic tendency to generate prolonged tail currents. Increasing the duration of the voltage step increases the duration of the tail current (compare red and blue traces to black). Recordings obtained in nucleated patches of membrane from hypoglossal motoneurons. Modified, with permission, from Moritz et al. 522.



Figure 6.

Input organization and electrical behavior of motoneurons in the base state, without significant levels of neuromodulation. (A) Summary of distribution of ionotropic synaptic currents within a motor pool. Data from a series of studies in motoneurons that innervate cat ankle extensor muscles by Powers, Binder and colleagues (reviewed in reference 579). Inputs generated by electrical stimulation of descending tracts [pyramidal (Pyr), rubrospinal (RN), vesitbulospinal (from Dieter's nucleus (RN)], ventral roots (recurrent inhibition via Renshaw cells), and tendon vibration [Ia monosynaptic excitation (Ia excit) and Ia disynaptic inhibition (Ia inhib)]. All measurements were made under steady‐state conditions. Figure modified, with permission, from reference 579). (B) Repetitive firing in response to a linearly rising injected current (control, thin trace). The thick trace indicates the response after administration of riluzole to block the NaPIC; the transient Na current remains but spiking cannot occur due to the lack of the acceleration in membrane potential due to the NaPIC (arrow on control trace). Redrawn, with permission, from the authors from data from Kuo et al. 418. (C) Summary of frequency‐current relations in S, FR, and FF motoneurons generated by linearly increasing injected currents. Based on simulations, with permission, by Heckman and Binder 305.



Figure 7.

Distribution of neurotransmitter serotonin (5‐HT) contacts on a cat motoneuron. Each dot indicates the presence of a synaptic bouton containing 5‐HT. Reconstruction of the cell, with permission, by Dianne Dewey. Figure created from data from Alvarez et al. 15, with permission from the authors.



Figure 8.

Effects of increasing Ca persistent inward current (CaPIC) amplitude on the firing produced by an excitatory synaptic input. A highly realistic motoneuron model was used to generate these results, based on a full reconstruction of a fast fatigue resistant (type FR) motoneuron with more than 700 dendritic compartments (based on references 194 and 193). The CaPIC was generated at a primarily middendritic location 89,193,269. On the left, a step increase in conductance is applied to excitatory synapses distributed throughout the dendritic tree. On the right, the same simulated synapses were activated in a triangular fashion. From the bottom up, the amplitude of the CaPIC is increased progressively, mimicking one of the main effects of increasing neuromodulatory input. Note the need for inhibitory input after the triangle of excitation to bring firing to a stop at the highest level. Simulations, with permission, by Dr. Sherif ElBasiouny.



Figure 9.

Current‐voltage (I‐V) and frequency current (F‐I) relations generated by triangular input waveforms in motoneurons with a steady background of neuromodulatory input. Black arrows indicate ascending and descending phases. (A) I‐V relation in a putative type S motoneuron. The persistent inward current (PIC) onset is indicated by the red arrow. (B) F‐I relation in the same type S motoneuron. The red arrow indicates the onset of the acceleration in firing due to PIC activation, which occurs right at threshold for onset of repetitive firing. Note that the hysteresis in PIC onset and offset (blue arrow) in A generates the hysteresis in firing onset and offset in B. (C) I‐V relation in a putative FF motoneuron. (D) F‐I relation in the same FF motoneuron. The lesser degree of I‐V hysteresis corresponds to lesser F‐I hysteresis. (E) I‐V relation in a rat motoneuron. (F) F‐I relation in the same rat motoneuron. As for the cat, the I‐V hysteresis produces F‐I hysteresis. [(A)‐(D)] Modified, with permission, from Lee and Heckman 437,439. [(E), (F)] Modified, with permission, from Hamm et al. 286.



Figure 10.

The persistent inward current (PIC) amplifies both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. (A) Amplification during repetitive firing. Lowest trace: sinusoidal muscle stretch to provide synaptic input. Next: linearly rising current injected into motoneuron to generate background firing. Upper trace: firing pattern evoked by the combined stretch and current. The strong increase in firing range in the last few cycles is due to amplification by the PIC (onset marked by green arrow). Modified, with permission, from Hultborn et al. 355. (B) Amplification of excitatory synaptic current as a function of voltage clamp holding potential. As the membrane potential is depolarized (x‐axis), synaptic current (y‐axis) increases and then decreases, demonstrating amplification and saturation. The vertical arrow indicates the approximate membrane potential at which the cell would begin spiking in unclamped conditions. The three traces show increasing levels of neuromodulatory input, low to high. Modified, with permission, from Lee and Heckman 435. (C) Computer simulation in which dendrites were depolarized by excitation alone (upper traces) and then by combined excitation and inhibition. Excitation alone activated the PIC, but inhibition sharply reduced PIC activation (red arrow). Modified, with permission, from Bui et al. 87. (D) Comparison of excitatory and inhibitory currents within one cell during voltage clamp at various membrane potentials. The excitatory current shows the same amplification pattern seen in B but inhibition deactivates the PIC and thus had its greatest influence in the voltage range where the PIC reaches its peak. Modified, with permission, from Hyngstrom et al. 358.



Figure 11.

Contractile properties of two motor units in first dorsal interosseus as estimated with spike‐triggered averaging. (A) The subject slowly increased the abduction force exerted by the index finger during an isometric contraction and the action potentials discharged by two motor units in first dorsal interosseus were detected with an intramuscular electrode. (B) The twitch forces of the two motor units (1 and 2) were estimated with spike‐triggered averaging of 512 discharge times. The time to peak force (contraction time) was 65 ms for Unit 1 and 39 ms for Unit 2. The peak forces were 2.9 and 14.7 mN, respectively. Modified, with permission, from Desmedt and Godaux 164.



Figure 12.

Contractile properties of 528 motor units in tibialis anterior as estimated with spike‐triggered averaging. (A) Histogram of twitch torques. (B) Relation between twitch torque and recruitment threshold for 40 motor units from a single individual. The linear relation (y = 0.72× + 13.0, r = 0.69) was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The relation for 514 motor units was slightly weaker (r = 0.61), but still statistically significant (P < 0.001). (C) Histogram of time to peak torque. (D) The relation between time to peak torque and recruitment threshold for the 40 motor units from the same subject was not statistically significant (y = –0.09 + 47.4, r = –0.23). However, there was a slight, but statistically significant, negative relation (y = –0.11× + 44.5, r = –0.21, P < 0.001) between time to peak torque and recruitment threshold for the sample of 514 motor units. Modified, with permission, from Van Cutsem et al. 723.



Figure 13.

Relation between stimulus frequency and the force exerted by single motor units located in muscles that extend the toes. (A) Motor units activated by intraneural stimulation (upper trace) evoked a dorsiflexion force (lower trace). (B) Relation between stimulus frequency and normalized force (mean ± SE) for the 13 motor units. Modified, with permission, from Macefield et al. 474.



Figure 14.

Spike‐triggered averaging of motor unit activity. (A) The experimental arrangement developed by Stein et al. 672 to estimate the contractile properties of motor units in first dorsal interosseus during a voluntary contraction. The isolated action potential of a motor unit was used to trigger an averaging device that accumulated a running average from the net force for a few hundred milliseconds each time an event was detected. [Modified, with permission, from McComas 492 by Joel A. Enoka.] (B) Relation (r2 = 0.582) between the spike‐triggered average force and recruitment threshold force for motor units in first dorsal interosseus during a ramp contraction. Modified, with permission, from Milner‐Brown et al. 513.



Figure 15.

Rate modulation during ramp increases and decreases in muscle force. (A) The recruitment and derecruitment thresholds of four motor units in rectus femoris, and the extent to which discharge rate was modulated (pulses per second; pps) during ramp contractions by the knee extensor muscles. The peak force during the isometric contraction was 33% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). [Modified, with permission, from Person and Kudina 561.] (B) The instantaneous discharge rate of 42 motor units in soleus during ramp‐and‐hold isometric contractions up to MVC force. Recruitment thresholds ranged from 0.2% to 96.4% MVC force. Adapted, with permission, from Oya et al. 545.



Figure 16.

Motor unit activity in first dorsal interosseus during brief isometric contractions at different target forces. (A) The discharge rate of 38 motor units (each line is a different motor unit) as young adults performed the isometric contractions (∼6 s) at approximately ten target forces with each motor unit. The target forces corresponded to an abduction force exerted by the index finger. The lower limit of each line indicates the minimal target forces at which the motor unit discharged action potentials repetitively. Twelve of the 38 motor units exhibited a clear plateau in discharge rate. (B) The experimental data were used to modify the Fuglevand model of motor unit recruitment and rate modulation 243 and the simulated data were compared with experimental measurements of the coefficient of variation for force across the operating range of the muscle [2‐95% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force]. The output of the model was indistinguishable from the experimental measurements and the graph shows the corresponding motor unit activity at each target force. Modified, with permission, from Moritz et al. 524.



Figure 17.

Influence of contraction speed on the activity of motor units in tibialis anterior. (A) The recruitment thresholds of three motor units (indicated by different colors) when the force increased linearly to 120 N in 0.4, 1.2, 2.3, 5.0, and 10.0 s. The target force was approximately 50% maximal voluntary contraction. The recruitment thresholds were close to zero when the time to the target was less than 0.15 s. The decrease in recruitment threshold was greatest for the motor unit with the highest threshold. (B) The increase in discharge for one motor unit when the task was to reach the target in 1 s (yellow), 5 s (purple), and 10 s (green). Based on data, with permission, from Desmedt and Godaux 165.



Figure 18.

Comparison of ballistic contractions performed with the dorsiflexor muscles before and after 12 weeks of training. (A) The torque (a) and rectified electromyogram (EMG) for tibialis anterior (B) produced by one individual during the submaximal isometric contractions. The peak torque for both traces was approximately 40% maximal voluntary contraction, but the rate of torque development was greater after training. The recruitment thresholds were close to zero when the time to the target was less than 0.15 s. The decrease in recruitment threshold was greatest for the motor unit with the highest threshold. (B) Schematic representation of the changes in dorsiflexion torque and the discharge rate of motor units in tibialis anterior (B and C). Training increased the instantaneous discharge rate (B) and the incidence of double discharges (C). Modified, with permission, from Van Cutsem et al. 722.



Figure 19.

Discharge characteristics of human biceps brachii motor units when recruited during a sustained isometric contraction. Left, representative trains of action potentials for a motor unit in an young human when the target force was set at a small [∼5% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC); blue] and large (∼10% MVC; red) difference below the recruitment threshold force of the motor unit. Right, similar recordings for a biceps brachii motor unit in an old human. Modified, with permission, from Pascoe et al. 524.



Figure 20.

The paired motor unit technique to estimate the contribution of persistent inward currents (PICs) to motor unit discharge. (A) Slow ramp increase and decrease in force exerted by the elbow flexor muscles. (B) The modulation of discharge rate for two motor units that were recruited during the task. The motor unit with the lower recruitment threshold, indicated as the reporter unit, provides an estimate of the synaptic drive received by the two motor units. Dashed vertical lines denote the recruitment and derecruitment thresholds of the test motor unit so that the difference in the discharge rate of the reporter unit (delta discharge frequency; ΔF) at these two instances can be determined to provide an index of the amplitude of the PIC during the ramp contractions. Modified, with permission, from Mottram et al. 526.



Figure 21.

The range of motoneuron electrical behaviors is very wide. (A) Influence of the level of neuromodulation (low, medium, and high) on net input‐output gain of a pool of motor units. Computer simulations based on Heckman and Binder 305,307. The arrow indicates the approximate sum of synaptic currents from the excitatory synaptic input systems illustrated in Figure 5A. The simulations included increased persistent inward currents (PICs), depolarized rest potentials and decreased spike thresholds. (B) One motoneuron exhibiting two very different electrical behaviors, depending on motor task. The cell was initially depolarized during scratching, possibly activating a PIC, but then onset of strong inhibition (red arrow) eliminated the influence of the PIC. Once a new baseline was established, the oscillation of the scratch began. In the same cell, an irritating stimulus to the opposite side of the body evoked a weight support response with a sustained plateau (presumably PIC driven) with only minor oscillations. Input conductance during scratch was much greater than during weight support. Modified, with permission, from Perreault 557.



Figure 22.

The PIC can generate saturation in firing rate. (A) In a cat extensor motoneuron, linear stretch of an extensor muscle (lower panel) produces a linear increase in synaptic current when the cell is held hyperpolarized to prevent persistent inward current (PIC) activation (thin trace, upper left panel). When the voltage clamp holding potential was depolarized to the approximate voltage at which spikes would be initiated in unclamped conditions (thick trace, upper left), the PIC amplifies (green arrow) and then saturates (red arrow) the input. (B) The firing response in the same cell to the same linear stretch, resulting in firing rate acceleration (green arrow) and rate limiting (red arrow). Data in A and B taken, with permission, from Lee et al. 446. (C) Firing pattern of a human biceps motor unit (upper panel) in response to a voluntary effort to linearly increase elbow flexion torque (bottom panel). Note the similarity to the firing pattern in the cat motoneuron in B. Data provided by Carol Mottram, with permission, from the database of reference 526.



Figure 23.

Plasticity in motor output to chronic spinal injury. Column (A) Upper panel: testing of tail spasticity in a rat with chronic injury at the S1 level. Note the electromyogram (EMG) recording in the tail muscle (records illustrated in column B). The two images below indicate the level of neurotransmitter serotonin (5‐HT) in the rat spinal cord before and after chronic spinal injury. The “mn” in the upper image indicates the cell body of a motoneuron. The arrow in the bottom image indicates a 5‐HT containing fiber, which is rare postinjury. Column (B) tail muscle electromyograms (EMGs) recorded in response to electrical stimulation to the tip of the tail (see A, top). This brief stimulus evokes a long‐lasting reflex (LLR), which is generated mainly by motoneuron persistent inward currents. Addition of an antagonist (SB242084) to block binding of 5‐HT has no significant effect (middle EMG, blue). In contrast, an inverse agonist (SB206553), which blocks constitutive 5‐HT receptor activity, greatly reduces the LLR (red). Modified, with permission, from Murray et al. 530.



Figure 24.

Plasticity following peripheral nerve reinnervation. (A) Illustration of the paradigm to study recovery from chronic peripheral nerve injury. Intracellular recording in a motoneuron (in ventral spinal cord, left) is used to record the responses to either electrical stimulation of the muscle nerve 1 or muscle stretch 2. (B) EPSPs generated by electrical stimulation (left column) and muscle stretch (right column). Note that some motoneurons (e.g., MN2) respond to electrical stimulation but not stretch, indicating the peripheral reinnervation of the stretch receptor in muscle has failed. Also, the response to electrical stimulation is weaker than in control (e.g., MN1). As a result, the stretch reflex does not recover. Modified, with permission, from Alvarez et al. 14.



Figure 25.

Dramatic changes in motoneuron morphology in response to injury and disease. (A) Prolonged axotomy of adult cat motoneurons induces conversion of dendrites to axons, especially in the distal regions. The cell on the left is normal. The one on the right has undergone prolonged axotomy. The distal extensions from the dendrites, such as those into the white matter at the left, have converted to an axon‐like phenotype and exhibit significant myelination. Provided by Ken Rose from the databank of cells stained by Rose and McDermid (see also reference 469 and 470). (B) Increased dendritic branching in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A normal motoneuron is illustrated on the left, while the cell on the right is from a mutant SOD1 animal. In both cases, the animals were less than 10 days old, so these profound anatomical changes occur long before symptom onset. Different colors indicate the multiple branches originating from primary trunks extending from different parts of the soma. Modified, with permission, from Amendola and Durand 16.

References
 1. Aagaard P, Suetta C, Caserotti P, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Role of the nervous system in sarcopenia and muscle atrophy with aging: Strength training as a countermeasure. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20: 49‐64, 2010.
 2. Abelew TA, Miller MD, Cope TC, Nichols TR. Local loss of proprioception results in disruption of interjoint coordination during locomotion in the cat. J Neurophysiol 84: 2709‐2714, 2000.
 3. Adachi T, Huxtable AG, Fang X, Funk GD. Substance P modulation of hypoglossal (XII) motoneuron excitability during development: Changing balance between conductances. J Neurophysiol 104, 854‐872, 2010.
 4. Adam A, De Luca CJ. Recruitment order of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle is maintained during fatiguing contractions. J Neurophysiol 90: 2919‐2927, 2003.
 5. Adrian E, Bronk D. The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres. Part II. The frequency of discharges in reflex and voluntary contractions. J Physiol 67: 119‐151, 1929.
 6. Adrian ED. Interpretation of the electromyogram. Lancet 1: 1229‐1233, 1281‐1285, 1925.
 7. Aghajanian GK, Rasmussen K. Intracellular studies in the facial nucleus illustrating a simple new method for obtaining viable motoneurons in adult rat brain slices. Synapse 3: 331‐338, 1989.
 8. Agrawal N, Hamam BN, Magistretti J, Alonso A, Ragsdale DS. Persistent sodium channel activity mediates subthreshold membrane potential oscillations and low‐threshold spikes in rat entorhinal cortex layer V neurons. Neuroscience 102: 53‐64, 2001.
 9. Alaburda A, Perrier JF, Hounsgaard J. An M‐like outward current regulates the excitability of spinal motoneurones in the adult turtle. J Physiol 540: 875‐881, 2002a.
 10. Alaburda A, Perrier JF, Hounsgaard J. Mechanisms causing plateau potentials in spinal motoneurones. Adv Exp Med Biol 508: 219‐226, 2002b.
 11. Albo F, Pieri M, Zona C. Modulation of AMPA receptors in spinal motor neurons by the neuroprotective agent riluzole. J Neurosci Res 78: 200‐207, 2004.
 12. Alford S, Grillner S. CNQX and DNQX block non‐NMDA synaptic transmission but not NMDA‐evoked locomotion in lamprey spinal cord. Brain Res 506: 297‐302, 1990.
 13. Altenburg TM, de Ruiter CJ, Verdijk PW, van Mechelen W, de Haan A. Vastus lateralis surface and single motor unit electromyography during shortening, lengthening and isometric contractions corrected for mode‐dependent differences in force‐generating capacity. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 196: 315‐328, 2009.
 14. Alvarez FJ, Bullinger KL, Titus HE, Nardelli P, Cope TC. Permanent reorganization of Ia afferent synapses on motoneurons after peripheral nerve injuries. Ann N Y Acad Sci U S A 1198: 231‐241, 2010.
 15. Alvarez FJ, Pearson JC, Harrington D, Dewey D, Torbeck L, Fyffe RE. Distribution of 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐immunoreactive boutons on alpha‐motoneurons in the lumbar spinal cord of adult cats. J Comp Neurol 393: 69‐83, 1998.
 16. Amendola J, Durand J. Morphological differences between wild‐type and transgenic superoxide dismutase 1 lumbar motoneurons in postnatal mice. J Comp Neurol 511: 329‐341, 2008.
 17. Andersen JL, Aagaard P. Effects of strength training on muscle fiber types and size; consequences for athletes training for high‐intensity sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20(Suppl 2): 32‐38, 2010.
 18. Armstrong JB, Rose PK, Vanner S, Bakker GJ, Richmond FJ. Compartmentalization of motor units in the cat neck muscle, biventer cervicis. J Neurophysiol 60: 30‐45, 1988.
 19. Arvanian VL, Motin V, Mendell LM. Comparison of metabotropic glutamate receptor responses at segmental and descending inputs to motoneurons in neonatal rat spinal cord. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312: 669‐677, 2005.
 20. Ashworth B, Grimby L, Kugelberg E. Comparison of voluntary and reflex activation of motor units. Functional organization of motor neurones. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 30: 91‐98, 1967.
 21. Aston‐Jones G, Rajkowski J, Cohen J. Locus coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention. Prog Brain Res 126: 165‐182, 2000.
 22. Bailey EF, Rice AD, Fuglevand AJ. Firing patterns of human genioglossus motor units during voluntary tongue movement. J Neurophysiol 97: 933‐936, 2007.
 23. Bakels R, Kernell D. Matching between motoneurone and muscle unit properties in rat medial gastrocnemius. J Physiol 463: 307‐324, 1993.
 24. Baker SN, Spinks R, Jackson A, Lemon RN. Synchronization in monkey motor cortex during a precision grip task. I. Task‐dependent modulation in single‐unit synchrony. J Neurophysiol 85: 869‐885, 2001.
 25. Baldissera F, Campadelli P, Piccinelli L. Neural encoding of input transients investigated by intracellular injection of ram currents in cat α‐motoneurones. J Physiol 328: 73‐86, 1982.
 26. Baldissera F, Hultborn H, Illert M. Integration in spinal neuronal systems. In: Brooks VB, editor. Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor control. Bethesda: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 509‐595.
 27. Balice‐Gordon RJ, Smith DB, Goldman J, Cork LC, Shirley A, Cope TC, Pinter MJ. Functional motor unit failure precedes neuromuscular degeneration in canine motor neuron disease. Ann Neurol 47: 596‐605, 2000.
 28. Ballou EW, Smith WB, Anelli R, Heckman CJ. Measuring dendritic distribution of membrane proteins. J Neurosci Methods 156: 257‐266, 2006.
 29. Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Jesunathadas M, Enoka RM. Rate coding is compressed but variability is unaltered for motor units in a hand muscle of old adults. J Neurophysiol 97: 3206‐3218, 2007.
 30. Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Riek S, Carson RG, Enoka RM. Common input to different regions of biceps brachii long head. Exp Brain Res 193: 351‐359, 2009.
 31. Barry BK, Riley ZA, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM. A spinal pathway between synergists can modulate activity in human elbow flexor muscles. Exp Brain Res 190: 347‐359, 2008.
 32. Basmajian JV. Control and training of individual motor units. Science 141: 440‐441, 1963.
 33. Basmajian JV. Control of individual motor units. Am J Phys Med 46: 480‐486, 1967.
 34. Baudry S, Klass M, Duchateau J. Postactivation potentiation influences differently the nonlinear summation of contractions in young and elderly adults. J Appl Physiol 98: 1243‐1250, 2005.
 35. Baudry S, Rudroff T, Pierpoint LA, Enoka RM. Load type influences motor unit recruitment in biceps brachii during a sustained contraction. J Neurophysiol 102: 1725‐1735, 2009.
 36. Bawa P, Calancie B. Repetitive doublets in human flexor carpi radialis muscle. J Physiol 339: 123‐132, 1983.
 37. Bawa P, Lemon RN. Recruitment of motor units in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in man. J Physiol 471: 445‐464, 1993.
 38. Bawa P, Murnaghan C. Motor unit rotation in a variety of human muscles. J Neurophysiol 102: 2265‐2272, 2009.
 39. Bawa P, Pang MY, Olesen KA, Calancie B. Rotation of motoneurons during prolonged isometric contractions in humans. J Neurophysiol 96: 1135‐1140, 2006.
 40. Bayliss DA, Umemiya M, Berger AJ. Inhibition of N‐ and P‐type calcium currents and the after‐hyperpolarization in rat motoneurones by serotonin. J Physiol 485: 635‐647, 1995.
 41. Bayliss DA, Viana F, Bellingham MC, Berger AJ. Characteristics and postnatal development of a hyperpolarization‐activated inward current in rat hypoglossal motoneurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 71: 119‐128, 1994.
 42. Bayliss DA, Viana F, Berger AJ. Mechanisms underlying excitatory effects of thyrotropin‐releasing hormone on rat hypoglossal motoneurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 68: 1733‐1745, 1992.
 43. Bean B, Mintz I. Pharmacology of different types of calcium channels in rat neurons. In: Handbook of Membrane Channels: Molecular and Cellular Physiology. Peracchia C: Academic Press, 1994.
 44. Beaumont E, Gardiner P. Effects of daily spontaneous running on the electrophysiological properties of hindlimb motoneurones in rats. J Physiol 540: 129‐138, 2002.
 45. Beaumont E, Gardiner P. Endurance training alters the biophysical properties of hindlimb motoneurons in rats. Muscle Nerve 27: 228‐236, 2003.
 46. Bennett DJ, Hultborn H, Fedirchuk B, Gorassini M. Short‐term plasticity in hindlimb motoneurons of decerebrate cats. J Neurophysiol 80: 2038‐2045, 1998a.
 47. Bennett DJ, Hultborn H, Fedirchuk B, Gorassini M. Synaptic activation of plateaus in hindlimb motoneurons of decerebrate cats. J Neurophysiol 80: 2023‐2037, 1998b.
 48. Bennett DJ, Li Y, Harvey PJ, Gorassini M. Evidence for plateau potentials in tail motoneurons of awake chronic spinal rats with spasticity. J Neurophysiol 86: 1972‐1982, 2001.
 49. Bennett DJ, Li Y, Siu M. Plateau potentials in sacrocaudal motoneurons of chronic spinal rats, recorded in vitro. J Neurophysiol 86: 1955‐1971, 2001.
 50. Bennett DJ, Sanelli L, Cooke CL, Harvey PJ, Gorassini MA. Spastic long‐lasting reflexes in the awake rat after sacral spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 91: 2247‐2258, 2004.
 51. Berg RW, Alaburda A, Hounsgaard J. Balanced inhibition and excitation drive spike activity in spinal half‐centers. Science 315: 390‐393, 2007.
 52. Berger AJ, Bayliss DA, Viana F. Modulation of neonatal rat hypoglossal motoneuron excitability by serotonin. Neurosci Lett 143: 164‐168, 1992.
 53. Bertrand S, Cazalets JR. Postinhibitory rebound during locomotor‐like activity in neonatal rat motoneurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 79: 342‐351, 1998.
 54. Bigland‐Ritchie B, Fuglevand AJ, Thomas CK. Contractile properties of human motor units: Is man a cat? Neuroscientist 4: 240‐249, 1998.
 55. Bigland‐Ritchie BR, Dawson NJ, Johansson RS, Lippold OC. Reflex origin for the slowing of motoneurone firing rates in fatigue of human voluntary contractions. J Physiol 379: 451‐459, 1986.
 56. Bigland B, Lippold OC. Motor unit activity In the voluntary contraction of human muscle. J Physiol 125: 322‐335, 1954.
 57. Binder MD. Integration of synaptic and intrinsic dendritic currents in cat spinal motoneurons. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 40: 1‐8, 2002.
 58. Binder MD. Intrinsic dendritic currents make a major contribution to the control of motoneurone discharge. J Physiol 552: 665, 2003.
 59. Binder MD, Bawa P, Ruenzel P, Henneman E. Does orderly recruitment of motoneurons depend on the existence of different types of motor units. Neurosci Lett 36: 55‐58, 1983.
 60. Binder MD, Heckman CJ, Powers RK. The physiolgocial control of motoneuron activity. In: Rowell LB, Shepherd JT, editors. Handbook of Physiology: Exercise, Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. New York: Oxford Univ Press, 1996, pp. 1‐53.
 61. Binder MD, Robinson FR, Powers RK. Distribution of effective synaptic currents in cat triceps surae motoneurons. VI. Contralateral pyramidal tract. J Neurophysiol 80: 241‐248, 1998.
 62. Blazevich AJ. Effects of physical training and detraining, immobilisation, growth and aging on human fascicle geometry. Sports Med 36: 1003‐1017, 2006.
 63. Blevins CE. Innervation patterns of the human stapedius muscle. Arch Otolaryngol 86: 136‐142, 1967.
 64. Blok JH, van Dijk JP, Drost G, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF. A high‐density multichannel surface electromyography system for the characterization of single motor units. Rev Sci Instrum 73: 1887‐1897, 2002.
 65. Bodine SC, Garfinkel A, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Spatial distribution of motor unit fibers in the cat soleus and tibialis anterior muscles: Local interactions. J Neurosci 8: 2142‐2152, 1988.
 66. Bodine SC, Roy RR, Eldred E, Edgerton VR. Maximal force as a function of anatomical features of motor units in the cat tibialis anterior. J Neurophysiol 57: 1730‐1745, 1987.
 67. Boe SG, Antonowicz NM, Leung VW, Shea SM, Zimmerman TC, Doherty TJ. High inter‐rater reliability in analyzing results of decomposition‐based quantitative electromyography in subjects with or without neuromuscular disorder. J Neurosci Methods 192: 138‐145, 2010.
 68. Boe SG, Dalton BH, Harwood B, Doherty TJ, Rice CL. Inter‐rater reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in the tibialis anterior muscle. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 947‐952, 2009.
 69. Booth V, Rinzel J, Kiehn O. Compartmental model of vertebrate motoneurons for Ca2+‐dependent spiking and plateau potentials under pharmacological treatment. J Neurophysiol 78: 3371‐3385, 1997.
 70. Bories C, Amendola J, Lamotte d'Incamps B, Durand J. Early electrophysiological abnormalities in lumbar motoneurons in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurosci 25: 451‐459, 2007.
 71. BoSmith RE, Briggs I, Sturgess NC. Inhibitory actions of ZENECA ZD7288 on whole‐cell hyperpolarization activated inward current (If) in guinea‐pig dissociated sinoatrial node cells. Br J Pharmacol 110: 343‐349, 1993.
 72. Bottinelli R. Functional heterogeneity of mammalian single muscle fibres: Do myosin isoforms tell the whole story? Pflugers Arch 443: 6‐17, 2001.
 73. Bottinelli R, Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, Reggiani C. Force‐velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: Myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence. J Physiol 495(Pt 2): 573‐586, 1996.
 74. Bottinelli R, Reggiani C. Human skeletal muscle fibres: Molecular and functional diversity. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 73: 195‐262, 2000.
 75. Bowker RM, Westlund KN, Sullivan MC, Coulter JD. Organization of descending serotonergic projections to the spinal cord. In: Kuypers HGJM, Martin GF, editors. Descending Pathways to the Spinal Cord. Progress in Brain Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982, pp. 239‐265.
 76. Bremner FD, Baker JR, Harrison LM, Carr L, Farmer SF, Stephens JA. Activity in branches of last order common stem presynaptic input fibers to motoneuron pools ‐ a mechanism for muscle synergy. In: Pierrot‐Deseilligny I, Jami L, Zytnicki D, editors. Muscle Afferents and Spinal Control of Movement Pergamon Press, 1992, pp. 187‐194.
 77. Brock LG, Coombs JS, Eccles JC. The recording of potentials from motoneurones with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol 117: 431‐460, 1952.
 78. Brown IE, Loeb GE. Measured and modeled properties of mammalian skeletal muscle. I. The effects of post‐activation potentiation on the time course and velocity dependencies of force production. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 20: 443‐456, 1999.
 79. Brownstone RM. Beginning at the end: Repetitive firing properties in the final common pathway. Prog Neurobiol 78: 156‐172, 2006.
 80. Brownstone RM, Gossard JP, Hultborn H. Voltage‐dependent excitation of motoneurones from spinal locomotor centres in the cat. Exp Brain Res 102: 34‐44, 1994.
 81. Brushart TM. Preferential motor reinnervation: A sequential double‐labeling study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1: 281‐287, 1990.
 82. Brushart TM. Nerve Repair. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
 83. Buchthal F, Schmalbruch H. Contraction times and fibre types in intact human muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 79: 435‐452, 1970.
 84. Büdingen HJ, Freund HJ. The relationship between the rate of rise of isometric tension and motor unit recruitment in a human forearm muscle. Pflügers Arch 362: 61‐67, 1976.
 85. Bui TV, Grande G, Rose PK. Multiple modes of amplification of synaptic inhibition to motoneurons by persistent inward currents. J Neurophysiol 99: 571‐582, 2008a.
 86. Bui TV, Grande G, Rose PK. Relative location of inhibitory synapses and persistent inward currents determines the magnitude and mode of synaptic amplification in motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 99: 583‐594, 2008b.
 87. Bui TV, Ter‐Mikaelian M, Bedrossian D, Rose PK. Computational estimation of the distribution of L‐type Ca(2+) channels in motoneurons based on variable threshold of activation of persistent inward currents. J Neurophysiol 95: 225‐241, 2006.
 88. Burke RE. Motor units: Anatomy, physiology, and functional organization. In: Brooks VB, editor. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 345‐422.
 89. Burke RE, Dum RP, Fleshman JW, Glenn LL, Lev‐Tov A, O'Donovan MJ, Pinter MJ. A HRP study of the relation between cell size and motor unit type in cat ankle extensor motoneurons. J Comp Neurol 209: 17‐28, 1982.
 90. Burke RE, Jankowska E, ten Bruggencate G. A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae. J Physiol 207: 709‐732, 1970.
 91. Burke RE, Levine DN, Salcman M, Tsairis P. Motor units in cat soleus muscle: Physiological, histochemical and morphological characteristics. J Physiol 238: 503‐514, 1974.
 92. Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FEd. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol 234: 723‐748, 1973.
 93. Burke RE, Rudomin P, Zajac FE III. The effect of activation history on tension production by individual muscle units. Brain Research 109: 515‐529, 1976.
 94. Burke RE, Strick PL, Kanda K, Kim CC, Walmsley B. Anatomy of medial gastrocnemius and soleus motor nuclei in cat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol 40: 667‐680, 1977.
 95. Burke RE, Tsairis P. Anatomy and innervation ratios in motor units of cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol 234: 749‐765, 1973.
 96. Burne JA, Carleton VL, O'Dwyer NJ. The spasticity paradox: Movement disorder or disorder of resting limbs? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76: 47‐54, 2005.
 97. Butler TJ, Kilbreath SL, Gorman RB, Gandevia SC. Selective recruitment of single motor units in human flexor digitorum superficialis muscle during flexion of individual fingers. J Physiol 567: 301‐309, 2005.
 98. Button DC, Gardiner K, Marqueste T, Gardiner PF. Frequency‐current relationships of rat hindlimb alpha‐motoneurones. J Physiol 573: 663‐677, 2006.
 99. Button DC, Kalmar JM, Gardiner K, Marqueste T, Zhong H, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, Gardiner PF. Does elimination of afferent input modify the changes in rat motoneurone properties that occur following chronic spinal cord transection? J Physiol 586: 529‐544, 2008.
 100. Calancie B, Bawa P. Voluntary and reflexive recruitment of flexor carpi radialis motor units in humans. J Neurophysiol 53: 1194‐1200, 1985.
 101. Calancie B, Bawa P. Limitations of the spike triggered averaging technique. Muscle Nerve 9: 78‐93, 1986.
 102. Calder KM, Stashuk DW, McLean L. Physiological characteristics of motor units in the brachioradialis muscle across fatiguing low‐level isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18: 2‐15, 2008.
 103. Calvin WH, Schwindt PC. Steps in production of motoneuron spikes during rhythmic firing. J Neurophysiol 35: 297‐310, 1972.
 104. Calvin WH, Stevens CF. Synaptic noise and other sources of randomness in motoneuron interspike intervals. J Neurophysiol 31: 574‐587, 1968.
 105. Carlin KP, Bui TV, Dai Y, Brownstone RM. Staircase currents in motoneurons: Insight into the spatial arrangement of calcium channels in the dendritic tree. J Neurosci 29: 5343‐5353, 2009.
 106. Carlin KP, Jiang Z, Brownstone RM. Characterization of calcium currents in functionally mature mouse spinal motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci 12: 1624‐1634, 2000.
 107. Carlin KP, Jones KE, Jiang Z, Jordan LM, Brownstone RM. Dendritic L‐type calcium currents in mouse spinal motoneurons: Implications for bistability. Eur J Neurosci 12: 1635‐1646, 2000.
 108. Carlsöö S. Motor units and action potentials in masticatory muscles. An electromyographic study of the form and duration of the action potentials and an anatomic study of the size of the motor units. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 2: 13‐19, 1958.
 109. Carp JS. Monosynaptic EPSPs in primate lumbar motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 70: 1585‐1592, 1993.
 110. Carp JS, Herchenroder PA, Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. Sag during unfused tetanic contractions in rat triceps surae motor units. J Neurophysiol 81: 2647‐2661, 1999.
 111. Carp JS, Tennissen AM, Mongeluzi DL, Dudek CJ, Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. An in vitro protocol for recording from spinal motoneurons of adult rats. J Neurophysiol 100: 474‐481, 2008.
 112. Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Motor unit behaviour and contractile changes during fatigue in the human first dorsal interosseus. J Physiol 534: 903‐912, 2001.
 113. Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Stephens JA. Evidence for bilateral innervation of certain homologous motoneurone pools in man. J Physiol 475: 217‐227, 1994.
 114. Cathers I, O'Dwyer N, Neilson P. Variation of magnitude and timing of wrist flexor stretch reflex across the full range of voluntary activation. Exp Brain Res 157: 324‐335, 2004.
 115. Catterall WA, Goldin AL, S.G. W. Voltage‐gated sodium channels. IUPHAR database (IUPHAR‐DB): http://www.iuphar‐db.org/DATABASE/FamilyMenuForward?familyId=82, 2010.
 116. Catterall WA, Perez‐Reyes E, Snutch TP, JS. Voltage‐gated calcium channels. IUPHAR database (IUPHAR‐DB) http://www.iuphar‐db.org/DATABASE/FamilyMenuForward?familyId=80, 2010.
 117. Chandler SH, Hsaio CF, Inoue T, Goldberg LJ. Electrophysiological properties of guinea pig trigeminal motoneurons recorded in vitro. J Neurophysiol 71: 129‐145, 1994.
 118. Christie A, Kamen G. Doublet discharges in motoneurons of young and older adults. J Neurophysiol 95: 2787‐2795, 2006.
 119. Christie A, Kamen G. Motor unit firing behavior during prolonged 50% MVC dorsiflexion contractions in young and older adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 19: 543‐552, 2009.
 120. Christie A, Kamen G. Short‐term training adaptations in maximal motor unit firing rates and afterhyperpolarization duration. Muscle Nerve 41: 651‐660, 2010.
 121. Christou EA, Rudroff T, Enoka JA, Meyer F, Enoka RM. Discharge rate during low‐force isometric contractions influences motor unit coherence below 15 Hz but not motor unit synchronization. Exp Brain Res 178: 285‐295, 2007.
 122. Christova P, Kossev A. Human motor unit activity during concentric and eccentric movements. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 40: 331‐338, 2000.
 123. Clamann HP, Schelhorn TB. Nonlinear force addition of newly recruited motor units in the cat hindlimb. Muscle Nerve 11: 1079‐1089, 1988.
 124. Clark BD, Dacko SM, Cope TC. Cutaneous stimulation fails to alter motor unit recruitment in the decerebrate cat. J Neurophysiol 70: 1433‐1439, 1993.
 125. Clemens S, Hochman S. Conversion of the modulatory actions of dopamine on spinal reflexes from depression to facilitation in D3 receptor knock‐out mice. J Neurosci 24: 11337‐11345, 2004.
 126. Clements JD, Nelson PG, Redman SJ. Intracellular tetraethylammonium ions enhance group Ia excitatory post‐synaptic potentials evoked in cat motoneurones. J Physiol Lond 377: 267‐282, 1986.
 127. Collins DF, Burke D, Gandevia SC. Sustained contractions produced by plateau‐like behaviour in human motoneurones. J Physiol 538: 289‐301, 2002.
 128. Conway BA, Hultborn H, Kiehn O, Mintz I. Plateau potentials in α‐motoneurones induced by intravenous injection of L‐DOPA and clonidine in the spinal cat. J Physiol 405: 369‐384, 1988.
 129. Conwit RA, Stashuk D, Suzuki H, Lynch N, Schrager M, Metter EJ. Fatigue effects on motor unit activity during submaximal contractions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81: 1211‐1216, 2000.
 130. Cope TC, Bonasera SJ, Nichols TR. Reinnervated muscles fail to produce stretch reflexes. J Neurophysiol 71: 817‐820, 1994.
 131. Cope TC, Clark BD. Motor‐unit recruitment in the decerebrate cat: Several unit properties are equally good predictors of order. J Neurophysiol 66: 1127‐1138, 1991.
 132. Crill WE. Persistent sodium current in mammalian central neurons. Annu Rev Physiol 58: 349‐362, 1996.
 133. Crone C, Hultborn H, Kiehn O, Mazieres L, Wigström H. Maintained changes in motoneuronal excitability by short‐lasting synaptic inputs in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 405: 321‐343, 1988.
 134. Crone C, Hultborn H, Kiehn O, Mazieres L, Wigstrom H. Maintained changes in motoneuronal excitability by short‐lasting synaptic inputs in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 405: 321‐343, 1988.
 135. Cui L, Maas H, Perreault EJ, Sandercock TG. In situ estimation of tendon material properties: Differences between muscles of the feline hindlimb. J Biomech 42: 679‐685, 2009.
 136. Cui L, Perreault EJ, Maas H, Sandercock TG. Modeling short‐range stiffness of feline lower hindlimb muscles. J Biomech 41: 1945‐1952, 2008.
 137. Cullheim S, Fleshman JW, Glenn LL, Burke RE. Membrane area and dendritic structure in type‐identified triceps surae alpha motoneurons. J Comp Neurol 255: 68‐81, 1987.
 138. Cushing S, Bui T, Rose PK. Effect of nonlinear summation of synaptic currents on the input‐output properties of spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 94: 3465‐3478, 2005.
 139. Dai Y, Jones KE, Fedirchuk B, McCrea DA, Jordan LM. A modelling study of locomotion‐induced hyperpolarization of voltage threshold in cat lumbar motoneurones. J Physiol 544: 521‐536, 2002.
 140. Dai Y, Jordan LM, Fedirchuk B. Modulation of transient and persistent inward currents by activation of protein kinase C in spinal ventral neurons of the neonatal rat. J Neurophysiol 101: 112‐128, 2009.
 141. Dartnall TJ, Nordstrom MA, Semmler JG. Motor unit synchronization is increased in biceps brachii after exercise‐induced damage to elbow flexor muscles. J Neurophysiol 99: 1008‐1019, 2008.
 142. Dasen JS, Liu JP, Jessell TM. Motor neuron columnar fate imposed by sequential phases of Hox‐c activity. Nature 425: 926‐933, 2003.
 143. Datta AK, Farmer SF, Stephens JA. Central nervous pathways underlying synchronization of human motor unit firing studied during voluntary contractions. J Physiol 432: 401‐425, 1991.
 144. Day BL, Dressler D, Maertens de Noordhout A, Marsden CD, Nakashima K, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: Surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol 412: 449‐473, 1989.
 145. Day SJ, Hulliger M. Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: Evidence for algebraic summation of motor‐unit action‐potential trains. J Neurophysiol 86: 2144‐2158, 2001.
 146. De Luca CJ, Erim Z. Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force. Trends Neurosci 17: 299‐305, 1994.
 147. De Luca CJ, Gonzalez‐Cueto JA, Bonato P, Adam A. Motor unit recruitment and proprioceptive feedback decrease the common drive. J Neurophysiol 101: 1620‐1628, 2009.
 148. De Luca CJ, LeFever RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP. Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol 329: 113‐128, 1982a.
 149. De Luca CJ, LeFever RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP. Control scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions. J Physiol 329: 129‐142, 1982b.
 150. Del Negro CA, Chandler SH. Regulation of intrinsic and synaptic properties of neonatal rat trigeminal motoneurons by metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Neurosci 18: 9216‐9226, 1998.
 151. Del Negro CA, Hsiao CF, Chandler SH, Garfinkel A. Evidence for a novel bursting mechanism in rodent trigeminal neurons. Biophys J 75: 174‐182, 1998.
 152. Del Valle A, Thomas CK. Firing rates of motor units during strong dynamic contractions. Muscle Nerve 32: 316‐325, 2005.
 153. Delgado‐Lezama R, Perrier JF, Nedergaard S, Svirskis G, Hounsgaard J. Metabotropic synaptic regulation of intrinsic response properties of turtle spinal motoneurones. J Physiol 504: 97‐102, 1997.
 154. Denier van der Gon JJ, ter Haar Romeny BM, van Zuylen EJ. Behaviour of motor units of human arm muscles ‐ differences between slow isometric contraction and relaxation. J Physiol 359: 107‐118, 1985.
 155. Denny‐Brown D. Interpretation of the electromyogram. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 61: 99‐128, 1949.
 156. Denny‐Brown D, Pennybacker JB. Fibrillation and fasciculation in voluntary muscle. Brain 61: 311‐334, 1938.
 157. Denslow JS. Double discharges in human motor units. J Neurophysiol 11: 209‐215, 1948.
 158. Derjean D, Bertrand S, Le Masson G, Landry M, Morisset V, Nagy F. Dynamic balance of metabotropic inputs causes dorsal horn neurons to switch functional states. Nat Neurosci 6: 274‐281, 2003.
 159. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in man: Characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol 264: 673‐693, 1977a.
 160. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Fast motor units are not preferentially activated in rapid voluntary contractions in man. Nature 267: 717‐719, 1977b.
 161. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in fast or slow human muscles: Discharge patterns of single motor units. J Physiol 285: 185‐196, 1978.
 162. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Voluntary motor commands in human ballistic movements. Ann Neurol 5: 415‐421, 1979.
 163. Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Spinal motoneuron recruitment in man: rank deordering with direction but not with speed of voluntary movement. Science 214: 933‐936, 1981.
 164. Destexhe A, Rudolph M, Pare D. The high‐conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 739‐751, 2003.
 165. Devasahayam SR, Sandercock TG. Velocity of shortening of single motor units from rat soleus. J Neurophysiol 67: 1133‐1145, 1992.
 166. Devaux JJ, Kleopa KA, Cooper EC, Scherer SS. KCNQ2 is a nodal K+ channel. J Neurosci 24: 1236‐1244, 2004.
 167. Dideriksen JL, Enoka RM, Farina D. Neuromuscular adjustments that constrain submaximal EMG amplitude at task failure of sustained isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 111: 485‐494, 2011.
 168. Dideriksen JL, Falla D, Baekgaard M, Mogensen ML, Steimle KL, Farina D. Comparison between the degree of motor unit short‐term synchronization and recurrence quantification analysis of the surface EMG in two human muscles. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 2086‐2092, 2009.
 169. Dideriksen JL, Farina D, Enoka RM. Influence of fatigue on the simulated relation between the amplitude of the surface electromyogram and muscle force. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 368: 2765‐2781, 2010.
 170. Dimitrov GV, Arabadzhiev TI, Hogrel JY, Dimitrova NA. Simulation analysis of interference EMG during fatiguing voluntary contractions. Part I: What do the intramuscular spike amplitude‐frequency histograms reflect? J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18: 26‐34, 2008.
 171. Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov GV. Amplitude‐related characteristics of motor unit and M‐wave potentials during fatigue. A simulation study using literature data on intracellular potential changes found in vitro. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12: 339‐349, 2002.
 172. Dityatev AE, Chmykhova NM, Dityateva GV, Babalian AL, Kleinle J, Clamann HP. Structural and physiological properties of connections between individual reticulospinal axons and lumbar motoneurons of the frog. J Comp Neurol 430: 433‐447, 2001.
 173. Dong XW, Feldman JL. Distinct subtypes of metabotropic glutamate receptors mediate differential actions on excitability of spinal respiratory motoneurons. J Neurosci 19: 5173‐5184, 1999.
 174. Drost G, Stegeman DF, Schillings ML, Horemans HL, Janssen HM, Massa M, Nollet F, Zwarts MJ. Motor unit characteristics in healthy subjects and those with postpoliomyelitis syndrome: A high‐density surface EMG study. Muscle Nerve 30: 269‐276, 2004.
 175. Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: Influence of task constraints. J Physiol 586: 5853‐5864, 2008.
 176. Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Human motor unit recordings: Origins and insight into the integrated motor system. Brain Res 1409: 42‐61, 2011.
 177. Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Human‐muscle adaptation to exercise. J Biophys Med Nucl 5: 249‐253, 1981.
 178. Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Effects of immobilization on contractile properties, recruitment and firing rates of human motor units. J Physiol 422: 55‐65, 1990.
 179. Duchateau J, Semmler JG, Enoka RM. Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units. J Appl Physiol 101: 1766‐1775, 2006.
 180. Duflocq A, Le Bras B, Bullier E, Couraud F, Davenne M. Nav1.1 is predominantly expressed in nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments. Mol Cell Neurosci 39: 180‐192, 2008.
 181. Dum RP, Kennedy TT. Synaptic organization of defined motor unit types in cat tibialis anterior. J Neurophysiol 43: 1631‐1644, 1980.
 182. Durand J. NMDA actions on rat abducens motoneurones. Eur J Neurosci 3: 621‐633, 1991.
 183. Durand J. Synaptic excitation triggers oscillations during NMDA receptor activation in rat abducens motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci 5: 1389‐1397, 1993.
 184. Eccles JC, Eccles RM, Lundberg A. The convergence of monosynaptic excitatory afferents on to many different species of alpha motoneurones. J Physiol 137: 22‐50, 1957.
 185. Edman KA. Double‐hyperbolic force‐velocity relation in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 404: 301‐321, 1988.
 186. Edström L, Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, distribution of fibres and fatiguability of single motor units. Anterior tibial muscle of the rat. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 31: 424‐433, 1968.
 187. Elbasiouny SM, Amendola J, Durand J, Heckman CJ. Evidence from computer simulations for alterations in the membrane biophysical properties and dendritic processing of synaptic inputs in mutant superoxide dismutase‐1 motoneurons. J Neurosci 30: 5544‐5558, 2010.
 188. Elbasiouny SM, Bennett DJ, Mushahwar VK. Simulation of dendritic CaV1.3 channels in cat lumbar motoneurons: Spatial distribution. J Neurophysiol 94: 3961‐3974, 2005.
 189. Elbasiouny SM, Bennett DJ, Mushahwar VK. Simulation of Ca2+ persistent inward currents in spinal motoneurones: Mode of activation and integration of synaptic inputs. J Physiol 570: 355‐374, 2006.
 190. Elek JM, Kossev A, Dengler R, Schubert M, Wohlfahrt K, Wolf W. Parameters of human motor unit twitches obtained by intramuscular microstimulation. Neuromuscul Disord 2: 261‐267, 1992.
 191. Ellaway PH. Cumulative sum technique and its application to the analysis of peristimulus time histograms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45: 302‐304, 1978.
 192. Elliott P, Wallis DI. Serotonin and L‐norepinephrine as mediators of altered excitability in neonatal rat motoneurons studied in vitro. Neuroscience 47: 533‐544, 1992.
 193. Emonet‐Denand F, Laporte Y, Proske U. Summation of tension in motor units of the soleus muscle of the cat. Neurosci Lett 116: 112‐117, 1990.
 194. English AW. An electromyographic analysis of compartments in cat lateral gastrocnemius muscle during unrestrained locomotion. J Neurophysiol 52: 114‐125, 1984.
 195. English AW, Letbetter WD. Anatomy and innervation patterns of cat lateral gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles. Am J Anat 164: 67‐77, 1982.
 196. Enoka RM, Baudry S, Rudroff T, Farina D, Klass M, Duchateau J. Unraveling the neurophysiology of muscle fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 21: 208‐219, 2011.
 197. Enoka RM, Fuglevand AJ. Motor unit physiology: Some unresolved issues. Muscle Nerve 24: 4‐17, 2001.
 198. Enoka RM, Robinson GA, Kossev AR. Task and fatigue effects on low‐threshold motor units in human hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 62: 1344‐1359, 1989.
 199. Erim Z, De Luca CJ, Mineo K, Aoki T. Rank‐ordered regulation of motor units. Muscle Nerve 19: 563‐573, 1996.
 200. Ermilov LG, Mantilla CB, Rowley KL, Sieck GC. Safety factor for neuromuscular transmission at type‐identified diaphragm fibers. Muscle Nerve 35: 800‐803, 2007.
 201. Falla D, Farina D. Motor units in cranial and caudal regions of the upper trapezius muscle have different discharge rates during brief static contractions. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 192: 551‐558, 2008a.
 202. Falla D, Farina D. Non‐uniform adaptation of motor unit discharge rates during sustained static contraction of the upper trapezius muscle. Exp Brain Res 191: 363‐370, 2008b.
 203. Farina D. Interpretation of the surface electromyogram in dynamic contractions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 34: 121‐127, 2006.
 204. Farina D. Counterpoint: Spectral properties of the surface EMG do not provide information about motor unit recruitment and muscle fiber type. J Appl Physiol 105: 1673‐1674, 2008.
 205. Farina D, Arendt‐Nielsen L, Graven‐Nielsen T. Effect of temperature on spike‐triggered average torque and electrophysiological properties of low‐threshold motor units. J Appl Physiol 99: 197‐203, 2005.
 206. Farina D, Arendt‐Nielsen L, Roatta S, Graven‐Nielsen T. The pain‐induced decrease in low‐threshold motor unit discharge rate is not associated with the amount of increase in spike‐triggered average torque. Clin Neurophysiol 119: 43‐51, 2008.
 207. Farina D, Cescon C, Negro F, Enoka RM. Amplitude cancellation of motor‐unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram can be estimated with spike‐triggered averaging. J Neurophysiol 100: 431‐440, 2008.
 208. Farina D, Falla D. Discharge rate of sternohyoid motor units activated with surface EMG feedback. J Neurophysiol 101: 624‐632, 2009.
 209. Farina D, Fattorini L, Felici F, Filligoi G. Nonlinear surface EMG analysis to detect changes of motor unit conduction velocity and synchronization. J Appl Physiol 93: 1753‐1763, 2002.
 210. Farina D, Fosci M, Merletti R. Motor unit recruitment strategies investigated by surface EMG variables. J Appl Physiol 92: 235‐247, 2002.
 211. Farina D, Holobar A, Gazzoni M, Zazula D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. Adjustments differ among low‐threshold motor units during intermittent, isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 101: 350‐359, 2009.
 212. Farina D, Holobar A, Merletti R, Enoka RM. Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram. Clin Neurophysiol 121: 1616‐1623, 2010.
 213. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 96: 1486‐1495, 2004.
 214. Farina D, Negro F. Estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity with a spectral multidip approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54: 1583‐1589, 2007.
 215. Farina D, Negro F, Gazzoni M, Enoka RM. Detecting the unique representation of motor‐unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram. J Neurophysiol 100: 1223‐1233, 2008.
 216. Farmer SF, Bremner FD, Halliday DM, Rosenberg JR, Stephens JA. The frequency content of common synaptic inputs to motoneurones studied during voluntary isometric contraction in man. J Physiol 470: 127‐155, 1993.
 217. Farmer SF, Swash M, Ingram DA, Stephens JA. Changes in motor unit synchronization following central nervous lesions in man. J Physiol 463: 83‐105, 1993.
 218. Fedirchuk B, Dai Y. Monoamines increase the excitability of spinal neurones in the neonatal rat by hyperpolarizing the threshold for action potential production. J Physiol 557: 355‐361, 2004.
 219. Feiereisen P, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Motor unit recruitment order during voluntary and electrically induced contractions in the tibialis anterior. Exp Brain Res 114: 117‐123, 1997.
 220. Feinstein B, Lindegård B, Nyman E, Wohlfart G. Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles. Acta Anat 23: 127‐142, 1955.
 221. Fetz EE, Perlmutter SI, Prut Y, Seki K, Votaw S. Roles of primate spinal interneurons in preparation and execution of voluntary hand movement. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 40: 53‐65, 2002.
 222. Filippi GM, Troiani D. Relations among motor unit types, generated forces and muscle length in single motor units of anaesthetized cat peroneus longus muscle. Exp Brain Res 101: 406‐414, 1994.
 223. Fisher ND, Nistri A. Substance P and TRH share a common effector pathway in rat spinal motoneurones: An in vitro electrophysiological investigation. Neurosci Lett 153: 115‐119, 1993.
 224. Fitts RH, Riley DR, Widrick JJ. Functional and structural adaptations of skeletal muscle to microgravity. J Exp Biol 204: 3201‐3208, 2001.
 225. Fleckenstein JL, Watumull D, Bertocci LA, Parkey RW, Peshock RM. Finger‐specific flexor recruitment in humans: Depiction by exercise‐enhanced MRI. J Appl Physiol 72: 1974‐1977, 1992.
 226. Fleshman JW, Munson JB, Sypert GW, Friedman WA. Rheobase, input resistance, and motor‐unit type in medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 46: 1326‐1338, 1981.
 227. Fling BW, Knight CA, Kamen G. Relationships between motor unit size and recruitment threshold in older adults: Implications for size principle. Exp Brain Res 197: 125‐133, 2009.
 228. Foehring RC, Sypert GW, Munson JB. Properties of self‐reinnervated motor units of medial gastrocnemius of cat. I. Long‐term reinnervation. J Neurophysiol 55: 931‐946, 1986a.
 229. Foehring RC, Sypert GW, Munson JB. Properties of self‐reinnervated motor units of medial gastrocnemius of cat. II. Axotomized motoneurons and time course of recovery. J Neurophysiol 55: 947‐965, 1986b.
 230. Foehring RC, Sypert GW, Munson JB. Motor‐unit properties following cross‐reinnervation of cat lateral gastrocnemius and soleus muscles with medial gastrocnemius nerve. I. Influence of motoneurons on muscle. J Neurophysiol 57: 1210‐1226, 1987a.
 231. Foehring RC, Sypert GW, Munson JB. Motor‐unit properties following cross‐reinnervation of cat lateral gastrocnemius and soleus muscles with medial gastrocnemius nerve. II. Influence of muscle on motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 57: 1227‐1245, 1987b.
 232. Forbes A. The interpretation of spinal reflexes in terms of present knowledge of nerve conduction. Physiol Rev 2: 361‐414, 1922.
 233. Freund H‐J, Budingen HJ, Dietz V. Activity of single motor units from human forearm muscles during voluntary isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 38: 933‐946, 1975.
 234. Frigon A. Reconfiguration of the spinal interneuronal network during locomotion in vertebrates. J Neurophysiol 101: 2201‐2203, 2009.
 235. Fuglevand AJ, Dutoit AP, Johns RK, Keen DA. Evaluation of plateau‐potential‐mediated ‘warm up’ in human motor units. J Physiol 571: 683‐693, 2006.
 236. Fuglevand AJ, Keen DA. Re‐evaluation of muscle wisdom in the human adductor pollicis using physiological rates of stimulation. J Physiol 549: 865‐875, 2003.
 237. Fuglevand AJ, Macefield VG, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Force‐frequency and fatigue properties of motor units in muscles that control digits of the human hand. J Neurophysiol 81: 1718‐1729, 1999.
 238. Fuglevand AJ, Winter DA, Patla AE. Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor‐unit pools. J Neurophysiol 70: 2470‐2488, 1993.
 239. Fuglevand AJ, Winter DA, Patla AE, Stashuk D. Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: Influence of electrode size and spacing. Biol Cybern 67: 143‐153, 1992.
 240. Fuglsang‐Frederiksen A. The utility of interference pattern analysis. Muscle Nerve 23: 18‐36, 2000.
 241. Fukunaga T, Kawakami Y, Kuno S, Funato K, Fukashiro S. Muscle architecture and function in humans. J Biomech 30: 457‐463, 1997.
 242. Fukuoka T, Kobayashi K, Noguchi K. Laminae‐specific distribution of alpha‐subunits of voltage‐gated sodium channels in the adult rat spinal cord. Neuroscience 169: 994‐1006, 2010.
 243. Funk GD, Kanjhan R, Walsh C, Lipski J, Comer AM, Parkis MA, Housley GD. P2 receptor excitation of rodent hypoglossal motoneuron activity in vitro and in vivo: A molecular physiological analysis. J Neurosci 17: 6325‐6337, 1997.
 244. Fyffe RE. Spatial distribution of recurrent inhibitory synapses on spinal motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 65: 1134‐1149, 1991.
 245. Galganski ME, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM. Reduced control of motor output in a human hand muscle of elderly subjects during submaximal contractions. J Neurophysiol 69: 2108‐2115, 1993.
 246. Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 81: 1725‐1789, 2001.
 247. Gardiner P, Beaumont E, Cormery B. Motoneurones “learn” and “forget” physical activity. Can J Appl Physiol 30: 352‐370, 2005.
 248. Gardiner P, Dai Y, Heckman CJ. Effects of exercise training on alpha‐motoneurons. J Appl Physiol 101: 1228‐1236, 2006.
 249. Gardiner PF, Kernell D. The “fastness” of rat motoneurones: Time‐course of afterhyperpolarization in relation to axonal conduction velocity and muscle unit contractile speed. Pflugers Arch 415: 762‐766, 1990.
 250. Garland SJ, Cooke JD, Miller KJ, Ohtsuki T, Ivanova T. Motor unit activity during human single joint movements. J Neurophysiol 76: 1982‐1990, 1996.
 251. Garland SJ, Enoka RM, Serrano LP, Robinson GA. Behavior of motor units in human biceps brachii during a submaximal fatiguing contraction. J Appl Physiol 76: 2411‐2419, 1994.
 252. Garland SJ, Gossen ER. The muscular wisdom hypothesis in human muscle fatigue. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30: 45‐49, 2002.
 253. Garland SJ, Griffin L. Motor unit double discharges: Statistical anomaly or functional entity? Can J Appl Physiol 24: 113‐130, 1999.
 254. Garnett R, Stephens JA. Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol 311: 463‐473, 1981.
 255. Gazula VR, Roberts M, Luzzio C, Jawad AF, Kalb RG. Effects of limb exercise after spinal cord injury on motor neuron dendrite structure. J Comp Neurol 476: 130‐145, 2004.
 256. Geertsen SS, Stecina K, Meehan CF, Nielsen JB, Hultborn H. Reciprocal Ia inhibition contributes to motoneuronal hyperpolarisation during the inactive phase of locomotion and scratching in the cat. J Physiol, 589: 119‐134, 2011.
 257. Gilmore J, Fedirchuk B. The excitability of lumbar motoneurones in the neonatal rat is increased by a hyperpolarization of their voltage threshold for activation by descending serotonergic fibres. J Physiol 558: 213‐224, 2004.
 258. Gilson AS, Mills WB. Activities of single motor units in man during slight voluntary efforts. Am J Physiol 133: 658‐669, 1941.
 259. Goldin AL. Resurgence of sodium channel research. Annu Rev Physiol 63: 871‐894, 2001.
 260. Gorassini M, Yang JF, Siu M, Bennett DJ. Intrinsic activation of human motoneurons: Possible contribution to motor unit excitation. J Neurophysiol 87: 1850‐1858, 2002a.
 261. Gorassini M, Yang JF, Siu M, Bennett DJ. Intrinsic activation of human motoneurons: Reduction of motor unit recruitment thresholds by repeated contractions. J Neurophysiol 87: 1859‐1866, 2002b.
 262. Gorassini MA, Knash ME, Harvey PJ, Bennett DJ, Yang JF. Role of motoneurons in the generation of muscle spasms after spinal cord injury. Brain 127: 2247‐2258, 2004.
 263. Gossen ER, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ. The time course of the motoneurone afterhyperpolarization is related to motor unit twitch speed in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 552: 657‐664, 2003.
 264. Grande G, Bui TV, Rose PK. Estimates of the location of L‐type Ca2+ channels in motoneurons of different sizes: A computational study. J Neurophysiol 97: 4023‐4035, 2007.
 265. Grande G, Bui TV, Rose PK. Distribution of vestibulospinal contacts on the dendrites of ipsilateral splenius motoneurons: An anatomical substrate for push‐pull interactions during vestibulocollic reflexes. Brain Res 1333: 9‐27, 2010.
 266. Gregor RJ, Smith DW, Prilutsky BI. Mechanics of slope walking in the cat: Quantification of muscle load, length change, and ankle extensor EMG patterns. J Neurophysiol 95: 1397‐1409, 2006.
 267. Griffin L, Garland SJ, Ivanova T, Gossen ER. Muscle vibration sustains motor unit firing rate during submaximal isometric fatigue in humans. J Physiol 535: 929‐936, 2001.
 268. Griffiths RI. Shortening of muscle fibres during stretch of the active cat medial gastrocnemius muscle: The role of tendon compliance. J Physiol 436: 219‐236, 1991.
 269. Grimby L, Hannerz J. Recruitment order of motor units on voluntary contraction: Changes induced by proprioceptive afferent activity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 31: 565‐573, 1968.
 270. Grimby L, Hannerz J. Differences in recruitment order of motor units in phasic and tonic flexion reflex in “spinal man”. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 33: 562‐570, 1970.
 271. Grimby L, Hannerz J. Firing rate and recruitment order of toe extensor motor units in different modes of voluntary conraction. J Physiol 264: 865‐879, 1977.
 272. Gustafsson B, Pinter MJ. Effects of axotomy on the distribution of passive electrical properties of cat motoneurones. J Physiol 356: 433‐442, 1984a.
 273. Gustafsson B, Pinter MJ. An investigation of threshold properties among cat spinal alpha‐motoneurones. J Physiol 357: 453‐483, 1984b.
 274. Gustafsson B, Pinter MJ. Relations among passive electrical properties of lumbar alpha‐motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol 356: 401‐431, 1984c.
 275. Gustafsson B, Pinter MJ. Relations among passive electrical properties of lumbar alpha‐motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol 356: 401‐431, 1984d.
 276. Gutman GA, Chandy KG, Grissmer S, Lazdunski M, Mckinnon D, Pardo LA, Robertson GA, Rudy B, Sanguinetti MC, Stühmer W, X. W. Voltage‐gated potassium channels. IUPHAR database (IUPHAR‐DB): http://www.iuphar‐db.org/DATABASE/FamilyMenuForward?familyId=81, 2010.
 277. Gydikov A, Kosarov D. Some features of different motor units in the biceps brachii muscle. Pflugers Arch 347: 75‐88, 1974.
 278. Haftel VK, Prather JF, Heckman CJ, Cope TC. Recruitment of cat motoneurons in the absence of homonymous afferent feedback. J Neurophysiol 86: 616‐628, 2001.
 279. Häger‐Ross CK, Klein CS, Thomas CK. Twitch and tetanic properties of human thenar motor units paralyzed by chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 96: 165‐174, 2006.
 280. Hamilton AF, Jones KE, Wolpert DM. The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans. Exp Brain Res 157: 417‐430, 2004.
 281. Hamm TM, Turkin VV, Bandekar NK, O'Neill D, Jung R. Persistent currents and discharge patterns in rat hindlimb motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 104: 1566‐1577, 2010.
 282. Hammar I, Jankowska E. Modulatory effects of alpha1‐,alpha2‐, and beta ‐receptor agonists on feline spinal interneurons with monosynaptic input from group I muscle afferents. J Neurosci 23: 332‐338, 2003.
 283. Han P, Nakanishi ST, Tran MA, Whelan PJ. Dopaminergic modulation of spinal neuronal excitability. J Neurosci 27: 13192‐13204, 2007.
 284. Harada Y, Takahashi T. The calcium component of the action potential in spinal motoneurones of the rat. J Physiol 335: 89‐100, 1983.
 285. Harridge SD. Plasticity of human skeletal muscle: Gene expression to in vivo function. Exp Physiol 92: 783‐797, 2007.
 286. Harridge SD, Bottinelli R, Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, Reggiani C, Esbjornsson M, Saltin B. Whole‐muscle and single‐fibre contractile properties and myosin heavy chain isoforms in humans. Pflugers Arch 432: 913‐920, 1996.
 287. Harris AJ, Duxson MJ, Butler JE, Hodges PW, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC. Muscle fiber and motor unit behavior in the longest human skeletal muscle. J Neurosci 25: 8528‐8533, 2005.
 288. Harris NC, Constanti A. Mechanism of block by ZD 7288 of the hyperpolarization‐activated inward rectifying current in guinea pig substantia nigra neurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 74: 2366‐2378, 1995.
 289. Harvey PJ, Li X, Li Y, Bennett DJ. 5‐HT2 receptor activation facilitates a persistent sodium current and repetitive firing in spinal motoneurons of rats with and without chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 96: 1158‐1170, 2006a.
 290. Harvey PJ, Li X, Li Y, Bennett DJ. Endogenous monoamine receptor activation is essential for enabling persistent sodium currents and repetitive firing in rat spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 96: 1171‐1186, 2006b.
 291. Harvey PJ, Li Y, Li X, Bennett DJ. Persistent sodium currents and repetitive firing in motoneurons of the sacrocaudal spinal cord of adult rats. J Neurophysiol 96: 1141‐1157, 2006c.
 292. Hatze H, Buys JD. Energy‐optimal controls in the mammalian neuromuscular system. Biol Cybern 27: 9‐20, 1977.
 293. Heckman CJ. Computer simulations of the effects of different synaptic input systems on the steady‐state input‐output structure of the motoneuron pool J Neurophysiol 71: 1727‐1739, 1994.
 294. Heckman CJ, Binder MD. Analysis of Ia‐inhibitory synaptic input to cat spoinal motoneurons evoked by vibration of antagonist muscles. J Neurophysiol 66: 1888‐1893, 1991.
 295. Heckman CJ, Binder MD. Analysis of effective synaptic currents generated by homonymous Ia afferent fibers in motoneurons of the cat. J Neurophysiol 60: 1946‐1966, 1988.
 296. Heckman CJ, Binder MD. Computer simulation of the steady‐state input‐output function of the cat medial gsatrocnemius motoneuron pool. J Neurophysiol 65: 952‐967, 1991.
 297. Heckman CJ, Binder MD. Computer simulations of motoneuron firing rate modulation. J Neurophysiol 69: 1005‐1008, 1993a.
 298. Heckman CJ, Binder MD. Computer simulations of the effects of different synaptic inputs systems on motor unit recruitment. J Neurophysiol 70: 1827‐1840, 1993b.
 299. Heckman CJ, Gorassini MA, Bennett DJ. Persistent inward currents in motoneuron dendrites: Implications for motor output. Muscle Nerve 31: 135‐156, 2005.
 300. Heckman CJ, Hyngstrom AS, Johnson MD. Active properties of motoneurone dendrites: Diffuse descending neuromodulation, focused local inhibition. J Physiol 586: 1225‐1231, 2008.
 301. Heckman CJ, Johnson M, Mottram C, Schuster J. Persistent inward currents in spinal motoneurons and their influence on human motoneuron firing patterns. Neuroscientist 14: 264‐275, 2008.
 302. Heckman CJ, Lee RH, Brownstone RM. Hyperexcitable dendrites in motoneurons and their neuromodulatory control during motor behavior. Trends Neurosci 26: 688‐695, 2003.
 303. Heckman CJ, Mottram C, Quinlan K, Theiss R, Schuster J. Motoneuron excitability: The importance of neuromodulatory inputs. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 2040‐2054, 2009.
 304. Heckman CJ, Weytjens JLF, Loeb GE. Effect of velocity and mechanical history on the forces of motor units in the cat medial gastrocnemius muscle. J Neurophysiol 68: 1503‐1515, 1992.
 305. Hegedus J, Putman CT, Gordon T. Time course of preferential motor unit loss in the SOD1 G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 28: 154‐164, 2007.
 306. Hegedus J, Putman CT, Tyreman N, Gordon T. Preferential motor unit loss in the SOD1 G93A transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Physiol 586: 3337‐3351, 2008.
 307. Henderson RD, Ridall PG, Hutchinson NM, Pettitt AN, McCombe PA. Bayesian statistical MUNE method. Muscle Nerve 36: 206‐213, 2007.
 308. Henneman E. Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science 126: 1345‐1347, 1957.
 309. Henneman E. Functional organization of motoneuron pools: The size principle. Proc Int Union Physiol Sci 12: 50, 1977.
 310. Henneman E, Clamann HP, Gillies JD, Skinner RD. Rank order of motoneurons within a pool: Law of combination. J Neurophysiol 37: 1338‐1349, 1974.
 311. Henneman E, Mendell LM. Functional organization of motoneuron pool and its inputs. In: Brooks VB, editor. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 423‐507.
 312. Henneman E, Olson CB. Relations between structure and function in the design of skeletal muscle. J Neurophysiol 28: 581‐598, 1965.
 313. Henneman E, Shahani BT, Young RR. Voluntary control of human motor units. Neurology 25: 368‐368, 1975.
 314. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 28: 599‐620, 1965a.
 315. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 28: 560‐580, 1965b.
 316. Hijikata T, Ishikawa H. Functional morphology of serially linked skeletal muscle fibers. Acta Anat (Basel) 159: 99‐107, 1997.
 317. Hille B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer, 2001.
 318. Hochman S, Garraway SM, Machacek DW, Shay BL. 5‐HT recpeptors and the neuromodulatory control of spinal cord function. In: Cope TC, editor. Motor Neurobiology of the Spinal Cord. London: CRC Press, 2001, pp. 47‐87.
 319. Hochman S, Jordan LM, Schmidt BJ. TTX‐resistant NMDA receptor‐mediated voltage oscillations in mammalian lumbar motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 72: 2559‐2562, 1994.
 320. Hochman S, McCrea DA. Effects of chronic spinalization on ankle extensor motoneurons. II. Motoneuron electrical properties. J Neurophysiol 71: 1468‐1479, 1994.
 321. Holobar A, Farina D, Gazzoni M, Merletti R, Zazula D. Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high‐density surface electromyogram. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 551‐562, 2009.
 322. Holobar A, Minetto MA, Botter A, Negro F, Farina D. Experimental analysis of accuracy in the identification of motor unit spike trains from high‐density surface EMG. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 18: 221‐229, 2010.
 323. Holobar A, Zazula D. Multichannel blind source separation using convolution kernel compensation. IEEE Trans Acoust, Speech, Signal Process 55: 4487‐4496, 2007.
 324. Holstege JC, Kuypers HG. Brainstem projections to spinal motoneurons: An update. Neuroscience 23: 809‐821, 1987.
 325. Hornby TG, McDonagh JC, Reinking RM, Stuart DG. Motoneurons: A preferred firing range across vertebrate species? Muscle Nerve 25: 632‐648, 2002.
 326. Hornby TG, Rymer WZ, Benz EN, Schmit BD. Windup of flexion reflexes in chronic human spinal cord injury: A marker for neuronal plateau potentials? J Neurophysiol 89: 416‐426, 2003.
 327. Houk JC, Rymer WZ. Neural control of muscle length and tension. In: Brooks V, editor. Handbook of Physiology. Washington DC: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 257‐323.
 328. Hounsgaard J, Hultborn H, Jespersen B, Kiehn O. Intrinsic membrane properties causing a bistable behaviour of alpha‐motoneurones. Exp Brain Res 55: 391‐394, 1984.
 329. Hounsgaard J, Hultborn H, Jespersen B, Kiehn O. Bistability of alpha‐motoneurones in the decerebrate cat and in the acute spinal cat after intravenous 5‐hydroxytryptophan. J Physiol 405: 345‐367, 1988a.
 330. Hounsgaard J, Hultborn H, Jespersen B, Kiehn O. Bistability of alpha‐motoneurones in the decerebrate cat and in the acute spinal cat after intravenous 5‐hydroxytryptophan. J Physiol 405: 345‐367, 1988b.
 331. Hounsgaard J, Kiehn O. Ca++ dependent bistability induced by serotonin in spinal motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 57: 422‐425, 1985.
 332. Hounsgaard J, Kiehn O. Calcium spikes and calcium plateaux evoked by differential polarization in dendrites of turtle motoneurones in vitro. J Physiol 468: 245‐259, 1993.
 333. Hounsgaard J, Mintz I. Calcium conductance and firing properties of spinal motoneurones in the turtle. J Physiol 398: 591‐603, 1988.
 334. Howell JN, Fuglevand AJ, Walsh ML, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Motor unit activity during isometric and concentric‐eccentric contractions of the human first dorsal interosseus muscle. J Neurophysiol 74: 901‐904, 1995.
 335. Hsiao C‐F, Wu N, Chandler SH. Voltage‐dependent calcium currents in trigeminal motoneurons of early postnatal rats: Modulation by 5‐HT receptors. J Neurophysiol 94: 2063‐2072, 2005.
 336. Hsiao CF, Del Negro CA, Trueblood PR, Chandler SH. Ionic basis for serotonin‐induced bistable membrane properties in guinea pig trigeminal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 79: 2847‐2856, 1998.
 337. Hsiao CF, Del Negro CA, Trueblood PR, Chandler SH. Ionic basis for serotonin‐induced bistable membrane properties in guinea pig trigeminal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 79: 2847‐2856, 1998.
 338. Hsiao CF, Trueblood PR, Levine MS, Chandler SH. Multiple effects of serotonin on membrane properties of trigeminal motoneurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 77: 2910‐2924, 1997.
 339. Hsiao CF, Wu N, Chandler SH. Voltage‐dependent calcium currents in trigeminal motoneurons of early postnatal rats: modulation by 5‐HT receptors. J Neurophysiol 94: 2063‐2072, 2005.
 340. Hultborn H. Plateau potentials and their role in regulating motoneuronal firing. Adv Exp Med Biol 508: 213‐218, 2002.
 341. Hultborn H. Changes in neuronal properties and spinal reflexes during development of spasticity following spinal cord lesions and stroke: Studies in animal models and patients. J Rehabil Med, 41 (Suppl): 46‐55, 2003.
 342. Hultborn H. State‐dependent modulation of sensory feedback. J Physiol 533: 5‐13, 2001.
 343. Hultborn H, Brownstone RB, Toth TI, Gossard JP. Key mechanisms for setting the input‐output gain across the motoneuron pool. Prog Brain Res 143: 77‐95, 2004.
 344. Hultborn H, Denton ME, Wienecke J, Nielsen JB. Variable amplification of synaptic input to cat spinal motoneurones by dendritic persistent inward current. J Physiol 552: 945‐952, 2003.
 345. Hutton RS, Enoka RM. Kinematic assessment of a functional role for recurrent inhibition and selective recruitment. Exp Neurol 93: 369‐379, 1986.
 346. Hyngstrom A, Johnson M, Schuster J, Heckman CJ. Movement‐related receptive fields of spinal motoneurones with active dendrites. J Physiol 586: 1581‐1593, 2008.
 347. Hyngstrom AS, Johnson MD, Heckman CJ. Summation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs by motoneurons with highly active dendrites. J Neurophysiol 99: 1643‐1652, 2008.
 348. Hyngstrom AS, Johnson MD, Miller JF, Heckman CJ. Intrinsic electrical properties of spinal motoneurons vary with joint angle. Nat Neurosci 10: 363‐369, 2007.
 349. Iansek R, Redman SJ. The amplitude, time course and charge of unitary excitatory post‐synaptic potentials evoked in spinal motoneurone dendrites. J Physiol 234: 665‐688, 1973.
 350. Inoue T, Itoh S, Kobayashi M, Kang Y, Matsuo R, Wakisaka S, Morimoto T. Serotonergic modulation of the hyperpolarizing spike afterpotential in rat jaw‐closing motoneurons by PKA and PKC. J Neurophysiol 82: 626‐637, 1999.
 351. Ito M, Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukashiro S, Fukunaga T. Nonisometric behavior of fascicles during isometric contractions of a human muscle. J Appl Physiol 85: 1230‐1235, 1998.
 352. Ito M, Oshima T. Electrical behaviour of the motoneurone membrane during intracellularly applied current steps. J Physiol 180: 607‐635, 1965.
 353. Jacobs BL, Martin‐Cora FJ, Fornal CA. Activity of medullary serotonergic neurons in freely moving animals. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 40: 45‐52, 2002.
 354. Jankowska E. Interneuronal relay in spinal pathways from proprioceptors. Prog Neurobiol 38: 335‐378, 1992.
 355. Jenny AB, Inukai J. Principles of motor organization of the monkey cervical spinal cord. J Neurosci 3: 567‐575, 1983.
 356. Jesunathadas M, Marmon AR, Gibb JM, Enoka RM. Recruitment and derecruitment characteristics of motor units in a hand muscle of young and old adults. J Appl Physiol 108: 1659‐1667, 2010.
 357. Jiang M, Schuster JE, Fu R, Siddique T, Heckman CJ. Progressive changes in synaptic inputs to motoneurons in adult sacral spinal cord of a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurosci 29: 15031‐15038, 2009.
 358. Jiang MC, Heckman CJ. In vitro sacral cord preparation and motoneuron recording from adult mice. J Neurosci Methods 156: 31‐36, 2006.
 359. Johnson KV, Edwards SC, Van Tongeren C, Bawa P. Properties of human motor units after prolonged activity at a constant firing rate. Exp Brain Res 154: 479‐487, 2004.
 360. Johnson MD, Heckman CJ. Interactions between focused synaptic inputs and diffuse neuromodulation in the spinal cord. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1198: 35‐41, 2010.
 361. Jones KE, Hamilton AF, Wolpert DM. Sources of signal‐dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol 88: 1533‐1544, 2002.
 362. Jones KE, Lyons M, Bawa P, Lemon RN. Recruitment order of motoneurons during functional tasks. Exp Brain Res 100: 503‐508, 1994.
 363. Jones SM, Lee RH. Fast amplification of dynamic synaptic inputs in spinal motoneurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 96: 2200‐2206, 2006.
 364. Joyce GC, Rack PMH, Westbury DR. The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements. J Physiol 204: 461‐474, 1969.
 365. Kallenberg LA, Hermens HJ. Motor unit properties of biceps brachii in chronic stroke patients assessed with high‐density surface EMG. Muscle Nerve 39: 177‐185, 2009.
 366. Kamavuako EN, Farina D. Time‐dependent effects of pre‐conditioning activation on muscle fiber conduction velocity and twitch torque. Muscle Nerve 42: 547‐555, 2010.
 367. Kamen G, Knight CA. Training‐related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59: 1334‐1338, 2004.
 368. Kamen G, Sullivan R, Rubinstein S, Christie A. Evidence of self‐sustained motoneuron firing in young and older adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 16: 25‐31, 2006.
 369. Kamo M. Discharge behavior of motor units in knee extensors during the initial stage of constant‐force isometric contraction at low force level. Eur J Appl Physiol 86: 375‐381, 2002.
 370. Kanda K, Desmedt JE. Cutaneous facilitation of large motor units and motor control of human fingers in precision grip. Adv Neurol 39: 253‐261, 1983.
 371. Kanda K, Hashizume K. Changes in properties of the medial gastrocnemius motor units in aging rats. J Neurophysiol 61: 737‐746, 1989.
 372. Kanda K, Hashizume K. Factors causing difference in force output among motor units in the rat medial gastrocnemius muscle. J Physiol 448: 677‐695, 1992.
 373. Kanosue K, Yoshida M, Akazawa K, Fuji K. The number of active motor units and their firing rates in voluntary contraction of human brachialis muscle. Jpn J Physiol 29: 427‐443, 1979.
 374. Katz B. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol 96: 45‐64, 1939.
 375. Keen DA, Fuglevand AJ. Distribution of motor unit force in human extensor digitorum assessed by spike‐triggered averaging and intraneural microstimulation. J Neurophysiol 91: 2515‐2523, 2004.
 376. Keenan KG, Farina D, Maluf KS, Merletti R, Enoka RM. Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. J Appl Physiol 98: 120‐131, 2005.
 377. Keenan KG, Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 100: 1928‐1937, 2006a.
 378. Keenan KG, Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. Influence of motor unit properties on the size of the simulated evoked surface EMG potential. Exp Brain Res 169: 37‐49, 2006b.
 379. Keenan KG, Valero‐Cuevas FJ. Experimentally valid predictions of muscle force and EMG in models of motor‐unit function are most sensitive to neural properties. J Neurophysiol 98: 1581‐1590, 2007.
 380. Kennedy PM, Cresswell AG. The effect of muscle length on motor‐unit recruitment during isometric plantar flexion in humans. Exp Brain Res 137: 58‐64, 2001.
 381. Kernell D. The delayed depolarization in cat and rat motoneurons. Progr Brain Res 12: 42‐55, 1964.
 382. Kernell D. Organized variability in the neuromuscular system: A survey of task‐related adaptations. Arch Ital Biol 130: 19‐66, 1992.
 383. Kernell D. The Motoneurone and Its Muscle fibres. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
 384. Kernell D, Zwaagstra B. Input conductance axonal conduction velocity and cell size among hindlimb motoneurones of the cat. Brain Res 204: 311‐326, 1981.
 385. Kernell D, Zwaagstra B. Size and remoteness: Two relatively independent parameters of dendrites, as studied for spinal motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol 413: 233‐254, 1989.
 386. Kidgell DJ, Sale MV, Semmler JG. Motor unit synchronization measured by cross‐correlation is not influenced by short‐term strength training of a hand muscle. Exp Brain Res 175: 745‐753, 2006.
 387. Kiehn O, Eken T. Prolonged firing in motor units: Evidence of plateau potentials in human motoneurons? J Neurophysiol 78: 3061‐3068, 1997.
 388. Kilbreath SL, Gorman RB, Raymond J, Gandevia SC. Distribution of the forces produced by motor unit activity in the human flexor digitorum profundus. J Physiol 543: 289‐296, 2002.
 389. Kilner JM, Alonso‐Alonso M, Fisher R, Lemon RN. Modulation of synchrony between single motor units during precision grip tasks in humans. J Physiol 541: 937‐948, 2002.
 390. Kirkwood PA, Sears TA. The synaptic connexions to intercostal motoneurones as revealed by the average common excitation potential. J Physiol 275: 103‐134, 1978.
 391. Klass M, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Age‐related decline in rate of torque development is accompanied by lower maximal motor unit discharge frequency during fast contractions. J Appl Physiol 104: 739‐746, 2008.
 392. Klein CS, Häger‐Ross CK, Thomas CK. Fatigue properties of human thenar motor units paralysed by chronic spinal cord injury. J Physiol 573: 161‐171, 2006.
 393. Knight CA, Kamen G. Modulation of motor unit firing rates during a complex sinusoidal force task in young and older adults. J Appl Physiol 102: 122‐129, 2007.
 394. Knight CA, Kamen G. Relationships between voluntary activation and motor unit firing rate during maximal voluntary contractions in young and older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 103: 625‐630, 2008.
 395. Kobayashi M, Inoue T, Matsuo R, Masuda Y, Hidaka O, Kang Y, Morimoto T. Role of calcium conductances on spike afterpotentials in rat trigeminal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 77: 3273‐3283, 1997.
 396. Kosarov D, Gydikov A. Dependence of the discharge frequency of motor units in different human muscles upon the level of the isometric muscle tension. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 16: 293‐306, 1976.
 397. Kossev A, Christova P. Discharge pattern of human motor units during dynamic concentric and eccentric contractions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109: 245‐255, 1998.
 398. Kossev A, Elek JM, Wohlfarth K, Schubert M, Dengler R, Wolf W. Assessment of human motor unit twitches–a comparison of spike‐triggered averaging and intramuscular microstimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93: 100‐105, 1994.
 399. Krawitz S, Fedirchuk B, Dai Y, Jordan LM, McCrea DA. State‐dependent hyperpolarization of voltage threshold enhances motoneurone excitability during fictive locomotion in the cat. J Physiol 532: 271‐281, 2001.
 400. Kudina LP, Alexeeva NL. After‐potentials and control of repetitive firing in human motoneurones. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol 85: 345‐353, 1992a.
 401. Kudina LP, Alexeeva NL. Repetitive doublets of human motoneurones: Analysis of interspike intervals and recruitment pattern. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85: 243‐247, 1992b.
 402. Kudina LP, Andreeva RE. Repetitive doublet firing of motor units: Evidence for plateau potentials in human motoneurones? Exp Brain Res 204: 79‐90, 2010.
 403. Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, contraction speed and fatiguability of rat soleus motor units. J Neurol Sci 20: 177‐198, 1973.
 404. Kukulka CG, Clamann HP. Comparison of the recruitment and discharge properties of motor units in human brachial biceps and adductor pollicis during isometric contractions. Brain Res 219: 45‐55, 1981.
 405. Kuo JJ, Lee RH, Johnson MD, Heckman HM, Heckman CJ. Active dendritic integration of inhibitory synaptic inputs in vivo. J Neurophysiol 90: 3617‐3624, 2003.
 406. Kuo JJ, Lee RH, Zhang L, Heckman CJ. Essential role of the persistent sodium current in spike initiation during slowly rising inputs in mouse spinal neurones. J Physiol 574: 819‐834, 2006.
 407. Kuo JJ, Schonewille M, Siddique T, Schults ANA, Fu RG, Bar PR, Anelli R, Heckman CJ, Kroese ABA. Hyperexcitability of cultured spinal motoneurons from presymptomatic ALS mice. J Neurophysiol 91: 571‐575, 2004.
 408. Kuo JJ, Siddique T, Fu R, Heckman CJ. Increased persistent Na+ current and its effect on excitability in motoneurones cultured from mutant SOD1 mice. J Physiol 563: 843‐854, 2005.
 409. Kutch JJ, Kuo AD, Rymer WZ. Extraction of individual muscle mechanical action from endpoint force. J Neurophysiol 103: 3535‐3546, 2010.
 410. LaBella LA, Kehler JP, McCrea DA. A differential synaptic input to the motor nuclei in triceps surae from the caudal and lateral cutaneous sural nerves. J Neurophysiol 61: 291‐301, 1989.
 411. Ladewig T, Lalley PM, Keller BU. Serotonergic modulation of intracellular calcium dynamics in neonatal hypoglossal motoneurons from mouse. Brain Res 1001: 1‐12, 2004.
 412. Laidlaw DH, Bilodeau M, Enoka RM. Steadiness is reduced and motor unit discharge is more variable in old adults. Muscle Nerve 23: 600‐612, 2000.
 413. Lapatki BG, Oostenveld R, Van Dijk JP, Jonas IE, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF. Topographical characteristics of motor units of the lower facial musculature revealed by means of high‐density surface EMG. J Neurophysiol 95: 342‐354, 2006.
 414. Lape R, Nistri A. Voltage‐activated K+ currents of hypoglossal motoneurons in a brain stem slice preparation from the neonatal rat. J Neurophysiol 81: 140‐148, 1999.
 415. Lape R, Nistri A. Current and voltage clamp studies of the spike medium afterhyperpolarization of hypoglossal motoneurons in a rat brain stem slice preparation. J Neurophysiol 83: 2987‐2995, 2000.
 416. Larkman PM, Kelly JS. Ionic mechanisms mediating 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐ and noradrenaline‐evoked depolarization of adult rat facial motoneurones. J Physiol 456: 473‐490, 1992.
 417. Larkman PM, Kelly JS. Modulation of IH by 5‐HT in neonatal rat motoneurones in vitro: Mediation through a phosphorylation independent action of cAMP. Neuropharmacology 36: 721‐733, 1997.
 418. Larkum ME, Launey T, Dityatev A, Luscher HR. Integration of excitatory postsynaptic potentials in dendrites of motoneurons of rat spinal cord slice cultures. J Neurophysiol 80: 924‐935, 1998.
 419. Larkum ME, Rioult MG, Luscher HR. Propagation of action potentials in the dendrites of neurons from rat spinal cord slice cultures. J Neurophysiol 75: 154‐170, 1996.
 420. Lateva ZC, McGill KC. Estimating motor‐unit architectural properties by analyzing motor‐unit action potential morphology. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 127‐135, 2001.
 421. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Adjustable amplification of synaptic input in the dendrites of spinal motoneurons in vivo. J Neurosci 20: 6734‐6740, 2000.
 422. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Bistability in spinal motoneurons in vivo: Systematic variations in persistent inward currents. J Neurophysiol 80: 583‐593, 1998a.
 423. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Bistability in spinal motoneurons in vivo: Systematic variations in rhythmic firing patterns. J Neurophysiol 80: 572‐582, 1998b.
 424. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Enhancement of bistability in spinal motoneurons in vivo by the noradrenergic alpha(1) agonist methoxamine. J Neurophysiol 81: 2164‐2174, 1999.
 425. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Essential role of a fast persistent inward current in action potential initiation and control of rhythmic firing. J Neurophysiol 85: 472‐475, 2001.
 426. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Influence of voltage‐sensitive dendritic conductances on bistable firing and effective synaptic current in cat spinal motoneurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 76: 2107‐2110, 1996.
 427. Lee RH, Heckman CJ. Paradoxical effect of QX‐314 on persistent inward currents and bistable behavior in spinal motoneurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 82: 2518‐2527, 1999.
 428. Lee RH, Kuo JJ, Jiang MC, Heckman CJ. Influence of active dendritic currents on input‐output processing in spinal motoneurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 89: 27‐39, 2003.
 429. Lepre M, Olpe HR, Brugger F. The effects of neurokinin‐1 receptor agonists on spinal motoneurones of the neonatal rat. Neuropharmacology 35: 511‐522, 1996.
 430. Levenez M, Garland SJ, Klass M, Duchateau J. Cortical and spinal modulation of antagonist coactivation during a submaximal fatiguing contraction in humans. J Neurophysiol 99: 554‐563, 2008.
 431. Levenez M, Kotzamanidis C, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Spinal reflexes and coactivation of ankle muscles during a submaximal fatiguing contraction. J Appl Physiol 99: 1182‐1188, 2005.
 432. Li X, Bennett DJ. Apamin‐sensitive calcium‐activated potassium currents (SK) are activated by persistent calcium currents in rat motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 97: 3314‐3330, 2007.
 433. Li X, Murray K, Harvey PJ, Ballou EW, Bennett DJ. Serotonin facilitates a persistent calcium current in motoneurons of rats with and without chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 97: 1236‐1246, 2007.
 434. Li Y, Bennett DJ. Persistent sodium and calcium currents cause plateau potentials in motoneurons of chronic spinal rats. J Neurophysiol 90: 857‐869, 2003.
 435. Li Y, Gorassini MA, Bennett DJ. Role of persistent sodium and calcium currents in motoneuron firing and spasticity in chronic spinal rats. J Neurophysiol 91: 767‐783, 2004.
 436. Li Y, Harvey PJ, Li X, Bennett DJ. Spastic long‐lasting reflexes of the chronic spinal rat studied in vitro. J Neurophysiol 91: 2236‐2246, 2004.
 437. Li Y, Li X, Harvey PJ, Bennett DJ. Effects of baclofen on spinal reflexes and persistent inward currents in motoneurons of chronic spinal rats with spasticity. J Neurophysiol 92: 2694‐2703, 2004.
 438. Liddell EGT, Sherrington CS. Recruitment and some other factors of reflex inhibition. Proc R Soc Lond Biol 97: 488‐518, 1925.
 439. Lindia JA, Abbadie C. Distribution of the voltage gated sodium channel Na(v)1.3‐like immunoreactivity in the adult rat central nervous system. Brain Res 960: 132‐141, 2003.
 440. Lindsay AD, Binder MD. Distribution of effective synaptic currents underlying recurrent inhibition in cat triceps surae motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 65: 168‐177, 1991.
 441. Lindsay AD, Feldman JL. Modulation of respiratory activity of neonatal rat phrenic motoneurones by serotonin. J Physiol 461: 213‐233, 1993.
 442. Lowery MM, Myers LJ, Erim Z. Coherence between motor unit discharges in response to shared neural inputs. J Neurosci Methods 163: 384‐391, 2007.
 443. Lucas SM, Ruff RL, Binder MD. Specific tension measurements in single soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscle fibers of the cat. Exp Neurol 95: 142‐154, 1987.
 444. Luscher HR, Larkum ME. Modeling action potential initiation and back‐propagation in dendrites of cultured rat motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 80: 715‐729, 1998.
 445. Maas H, Prilutsky BI, Nichols TR, Gregor RJ. The effects of self‐reinnervation of cat medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles on hindlimb kinematics in slope walking. Exp Brain Res 181: 377‐393, 2007.
 446. Maas H, Sandercock TG. Are skeletal muscles independent actuators? Force transmission from soleus muscle in the cat. J Appl Physiol 104: 1557‐1567, 2008.
 447. MacDermid V, Neuber‐Hess M, Short C, Rose PK. Alterations to neuronal polarity following permanent axotomy: A quantitative analysis of changes to MAP2a/b and GAP‐43 distributions in axotomized motoneurons in the adult cat. J Comp Neurol 450: 318‐333, 2002.
 448. MacDermid VE, Neuber‐Hess MS, Rose PK. The temporal sequence of morphological and molecular changes in axotomized feline motoneurons leading to the formation of axons from the ends of dendrites. J Comp Neurol 468: 233‐250, 2004.
 449. Macdonell CW, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ. Afterhyperpolarization time‐course and minimal discharge rate in low threshold motor units in humans. Exp Brain Res 189: 23‐33, 2008.
 450. MacDonell CW, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ. Reliability of the interval death rate analysis for estimating the time course of the motoneurone afterhyperpolarization in humans. J Neurosci Methods 162: 314‐319, 2007.
 451. MacDonell CW, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ. Changes in the estimated time course of the motoneuron afterhyperpolarization induced by tendon vibration. J Neurophysiol 104: 3240‐3249, 2010.
 452. Macefield VG, Fuglevand AJ, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Contractile properties of single motor units in human toe extensors assessed by intraneural motor axon stimulation. J Neurophysiol 75: 2509‐2519, 1996.
 453. Macefield VG, Fuglevand AJ, Howell JN, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Discharge behaviour of single motor units during maximal voluntary contractions of a human toe extensor. J Physiol 528(Pt 1): 227‐234, 2000.
 454. Major LA, Jones KE. Simulations of motor unit number estimation techniques. J Neural Eng 2: 17‐34, 2005.
 455. Maltenfort MG, McCurdy ML, Phillips CA, Turkin VV, Hamm TM. Location and magnitude of conductance changes produced by Renshaw recurrent inhibition in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 92: 1417‐1432, 2004.
 456. Manning CD, Miller TA, Burnham ML, Murnaghan CD, Calancie B, Bawa P. Recovery of human motoneurons during rotation. Exp Brain Res 204: 139‐144, 2010.
 457. Mantilla CB, Rowley KL, Zhan WZ, Fahim MA, Sieck GC. Synaptic vesicle pools at diaphragm neuromuscular junctions vary with motoneuron soma, not axon terminal, inactivity. Neuroscience 146: 178‐189, 2007.
 458. Manuel M. (Unpublished observations).
 459. Manuel M, Iglesias C, Donnet M, Leroy F, Heckman CJ, Zytnicki D. Fast kinetics, high‐frequency oscillations, subprimary firing range in adult mouse spinal motoneurons. J Neurosci 29: 11246‐11256, 2009.
 460. Manuel M, Meunier C, Donnet M, Zytnicki D. How much afterhyperpolarization conductance is recruited by an action potential? A dynamic‐clamp study in cat lumbar motoneurons. J Neurosci 25: 8917‐8923, 2005.
 461. Manuel M, Meunier C, Donnet M, Zytnicki D. Resonant or not, two amplification modes of proprioceptive inputs by persistent inward currents in spinal motoneurons. J Neurosci 27: 12977‐12988, 2007.
 462. Marchetti C, Taccola G, Nistri A. Distinct subtypes of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors on rat spinal neurons mediate complex facilitatory and inhibitory effects. Eur J Neurosci 18: 1873‐1883, 2003.
 463. Marks JD, Donnelly DF, Haddad GG. Adenosine‐induced inhibition of vagal motoneuron excitability: Receptor subtype and mechanisms. Am J Physiol 264: L124‐L132, 1993.
 464. Marsden CD, Meadows JC, Merton PA. “Muscular wisdom” that minimizes fatigue during prolonged effort in man: Peak rates of motoneuron discharge and slowing of discharge during fatigue. Adv Neurol 39: 169‐211, 1983.
 465. Masakado Y, Noda Y, Nagata MA, Kimura A, Chino N, Akaboshi K. Macro‐EMG and motor unit recruitment threshold: Differences between the young and the aged. Neurosci Lett 179: 1‐4, 1994.
 466. Maton B. Fast and slow motor units: Their recruitment for tonic and phasic contraction in normal man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 43: 45‐55, 1980.
 467. Mattei B, Schmied A, Mazzocchio R, Decchi B, Rossi A, Vedel JP. Pharmacologically induced enhancement of recurrent inhibition in humans: Effects on motoneurone discharge patterns. J Physiol 548: 615‐629, 2003.
 468. Matthews PB. Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post‐spike after‐hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. J Physiol 492: 597‐628, 1996.
 469. Maxwell L, Maxwell DJ, Neilson M, Kerr R. A confocal microscopic survey of serotoninergic axons in the lumbar spinal cord of the rat: Co‐localization with glutamate decarboxylase and neuropeptides. Neuroscience 75: 471‐480, 1996.
 470. McComas AJ. Motor unit estimation: Anxieties and achievements. Muscle Nerve 18: 369‐379, 1995.
 471. McComas AJ, Fawcett PR, Campbell MJ, Sica RE. Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34: 121‐131, 1971.
 472. McCrea DA, Rybak IA. Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation. Brain Res Rev 57: 134‐146, 2008.
 473. McIsaac TL, Fuglevand AJ. Common synaptic input across motor nuclei supplying intrinsic muscles involved in the precision grip. Exp Brain Res 188: 159‐164, 2008.
 474. McLarnon JG. Inactivation of a high conductance calcium dependent potassium current in rat hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett 193: 5‐8, 1995a.
 475. McLarnon JG. Potassium currents in motoneurones. Prog Neurobiol 47: 513‐531, 1995b.
 476. McNulty PA, Cresswell AG. Recruitment of single human low‐threshold motor units with increasing loads at different muscle lengths. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14: 369‐377, 2004.
 477. McNulty PA, Falland KJ, Macefield VG. Comparison of contractile properties of single motor units in human intrinsic and extrinsic finger muscles. J Physiol 526(Pt 2): 445‐456, 2000.
 478. Meehan CF, MacDermid VE, Montague SJ, Neuber‐Hess M, Rose PK. Dendrite‐derived supernumerary axons on adult axotomized motor neurons possess proteins that are essential for the initiation and propagation of action potentials and synaptic vesicle release. J Neurosci 31: 6732‐6740, 2011.
 479. Meehan CF, Sukiasyan N, Zhang M, Nielsen JB, Hultborn H. Intrinsic properties of mouse lumbar motoneurons revealed by intracellular recording in vivo. J Neurophysiol 103: 2599‐2610, 2010.
 480. Merletti R, Holobar A, Farina D. Analysis of motor units with high‐density surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18: 879‐890, 2008.
 481. Mesin L, Damiano L, Farina D. Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from simulated surface EMG in pinnate muscles. J Neurosci Methods 160: 327‐334, 2007.
 482. Miles GB, Dai Y, Brownstone RM. Mechanisms underlying the early phase of spike frequency adaptation in mouse spinal motoneurones. J Physiol 566: 519‐532, 2005.
 483. Miles GB, Hartley R, Todd AJ, Brownstone RM. Spinal cholinergic interneurons regulate the excitability of motoneurons during locomotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 2448‐2453, 2007.
 484. Miles GB, Lipski J, Lorier AR, Laslo P, Funk GD. Differential expression of voltage‐activated calcium channels in III and XII motoneurones during development in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 20: 903‐913, 2004.
 485. Miles GB, Parkis MA, Lipski J, Funk GD. Modulation of phrenic motoneuron excitability by ATP: Consequences for respiratory‐related output in vitro. J Appl Physiol 92: 1899‐1910, 2002.
 486. Miller JF, Paul KD, Lee RH, Rymer WZ, Heckman CJ. Restoration of extensor excitability in the acute spinal cat by the 5‐HT2 agonist DOI. J Neurophysiol 75: 620‐628, 1996.
 487. Milligan CJ, Edwards IJ, Deuchars J. HCN1 ion channel immunoreactivity in spinal cord and medulla oblongata. Brain Res 1081: 79‐91, 2006.
 488. Milner‐Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R. Changes in firing rate of human motor units during linearly changing voluntary contractions. J Physiol 230: 371‐390, 1973a.
 489. Milner‐Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R. The contractile properties of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions. J Physiol 228: 285‐306, 1973b.
 490. Milner‐Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R. The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions. J Physiol 230: 359‐370, 1973c.
 491. Minetto MA, Holobar A, Botter A, Farina D. Discharge properties of motor units of the abductor hallucis muscle during cramp contractions. J Neurophysiol 102: 1890‐1901, 2009.
 492. Mochizuki G, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ. Factors affecting the common modulation of bilateral motor unit discharge in human soleus muscles. J Neurophysiol 97: 3917‐3925, 2007.
 493. Mongan LC, Hill MJ, Chen MX, Tate SN, Collins SD, Buckby L, Grubb BD. The distribution of small and intermediate conductance calcium‐activated potassium channels in the rat sensory nervous system. Neuroscience 131: 161‐175, 2005.
 494. Monster AW, Chan H. Isometric force production by motor units of extensor digitorum communis muscle in man. J Neurophysiol 40: 1432‐1443, 1977.
 495. Monti RJ, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Role of motor unit structure in defining function. Muscle Nerve 24: 848‐866, 2001.
 496. Monti RJ, Roy RR, Hodgson JA, Edgerton VR. Transmission of forces within mammalian skeletal muscles. J Biomech 32: 371‐380, 1999.
 497. Moore J, Appenteng K. The membrane properties and firing characteristics of rat jaw‐elevator motoneurones. J Physiol 423: 137‐153, 1990.
 498. Morgan DL, Whitehead NP, Wise AK, Gregory JE, Proske U. Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle. J Physiol 522(Pt 3): 503‐513, 2000.
 499. Moritz AT, Newkirk G, Powers RK, Binder MD. Facilitation of somatic calcium channels can evoke prolonged tail currents in rat hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 98: 1042‐1047, 2007.
 500. Moritz CT, Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM. Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 93: 2449‐2459, 2005.
 501. Mottram CJ, Jakobi JM, Semmler JG, Enoka RM. Motor‐unit activity differs with load type during a fatiguing contraction. J Neurophysiol 93: 1381‐1392, 2005.
 502. Mottram CJ, Suresh NL, Heckman CJ, Gorassini MA, Rymer WZ. Origins of abnormal excitability in biceps brachii motoneurons of spastic‐paretic stroke survivors. J Neurophysiol 102: 2026‐2038, 2009.
 503. Mottram CJ, Wallace CL, Chikando CN, Rymer WZ. Origins of spontaneous firing of motor units in the spastic‐paretic biceps brachii muscle of stroke survivors. J Neurophysiol 104: 3168‐3179, 2010.
 504. Muennich EA, Fyffe RE. Focal aggregation of voltage‐gated, Kv2.1 subunit‐containing, potassium channels at synaptic sites in rat spinal motoneurones. J Physiol 554: 673‐685, 2004.
 505. Munson JB, Foehring RC, Lofton SA, Zengel JE, Sypert GW. Plasticity of medial gastrocnemius motor units following cordotomy in the cat. J Neurophysiol 55: 619‐634, 1986.
 506. Murray KC, Nakae A, Stephens MJ, Rank M, D'Amico J, Harvey PJ, Li X, Harris RL, Ballou EW, Anelli R, Heckman CJ, Mashimo T, Vavrek R, Sanelli L, Gorassini MA, Bennett DJ, Fouad K. Recovery of motoneuron and locomotor function after spinal cord injury depends on constitutive activity in 5‐HT2C receptors. Nat Med 16: 694‐700, 2010.
 507. Mynlieff M, Beam KG. Adenosine acting at an A1 receptor decreases N‐type calcium current in mouse motoneurons. J Neurosci 14: 3628‐3634, 1994.
 508. Nardone A, Romano C, Schieppati M. Selective recruitment of high‐threshold human motor units during voluntary isotonic lengthening of active muscle. J Physiol 409: 451‐471, 1989.
 509. Nardone A, Schieppati M. Shift of activity from slow to fast muscle during voluntary lengthening contractions of the triceps surae muscles in humans. J Physiol 395: 363‐381, 1988.
 510. Negro F, Holobar A, Farina D. Fluctuations in isometric muscle force can be described by one linear projection of low‐frequency components of motor unit discharge rates. J Physiol 587: 5925‐5938, 2009.
 511. Nguyen Q‐T, Wessel R, Kleinfeld D. Developmental regulation of active and passive membrane properties in rat vibrissa motoneurones. J Physiol 556: 203‐219, 2004.
 512. Nichols DE, Nichols CD. Serotonin receptors. Chem Rev 108: 1614‐1641, 2008.
 513. Nichols TR, Cope TC, Abelew TA. Rapid spinal mechanisms of motor coordination. Ex Sport Sci Rev 27: 255‐284, 1999.
 514. Nishimura Y, Schwindt PC, Crill WE. Electrical properties of facial motoneurons in brainstem slices from guinea pig. Brain Res 502: 127‐142, 1989.
 515. Nordstrom MA, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM. Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross‐correlogram. J Physiol 453: 547‐574, 1992.
 516. Nordstrom MA, Miles TS, Veale JL. Effect of motor unit firing pattern on twitches obtained by spike‐triggered averaging. Muscle Nerve 12: 556‐567, 1989.
 517. Norton JA, Bennett DJ, Knash ME, Murray KC, Gorassini MA. Changes in sensory‐evoked synaptic activation of motoneurons after spinal cord injury in man. Brain 131: 1478‐1491, 2008.
 518. Notomi T, Shigemoto R. Immunohistochemical localization of Ih channel subunits, HCN1‐4, in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 471: 241‐276, 2004.
 519. Ounjian M, Roy RR, Eldred E, Garfinkel A, Payne JR, Armstrong A, Toga AW, Edgerton VR. Physiological and developmental implications of motor unit anatomy. J Neurobiol 22: 547‐559, 1991.
 520. Oya T, Riek S, Cresswell AG. Recruitment and rate coding organisation for soleus motor units across entire range of voluntary isometric plantar flexions. J Physiol 587: 4737‐4748, 2009.
 521. Pambo‐Pambo A, Durand J, Gueritaud JP. Early excitability changes in lumbar motoneurons of transgenic SOD1G85R and SOD1G(93A‐Low) mice. J Neurophysiol 102: 3627‐3642, 2009.
 522. Pan Z, Kao T, Horvath Z, Lemos J, Sul J‐Y, Cranstoun SD, Bennett V, Scherer SS, Cooper EC. A common ankyrin‐G‐based mechanism retains KCNQ and NaV channels at electrically active domains of the axon. J Neurosci 26: 2599‐2613, 2006.
 523. Parkis MA, Bayliss DA, Berger AJ. Actions of norepinephrine on rat hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 74: 1911‐1919, 1995.
 524. Parkis MA, Berger AJ. Clonidine reduces hyperpolarization‐activated inward current (Ih) in rat hypoglossal motoneurons. Brain Res 769: 108‐118, 1997.
 525. Partridge LD, Benton LA. Muscle, the motor. In: Brooks VB, editor. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1981, pp. 43‐106.
 526. Pascoe MA, Holmes MR, Enoka RM. Discharge characteristics of biceps brachii motor units at recruitment when older adults sustained an isometric contraction. J Neurophysiol 105: 571‐581, 2011.
 527. Pasquet B, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Change in muscle fascicle length influences the recruitment and discharge rate of motor units during isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 94: 3126‐3133, 2005.
 528. Pasquet B, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Specific modulation of motor unit discharge for a similar change in fascicle length during shortening and lengthening contractions in humans. J Physiol 577: 753‐765, 2006.
 529. Patten C, Kamen G. Adaptations in motor unit discharge activity with force control training in young and older human adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 83: 128‐143, 2000.
 530. Perreault EJ, Day SJ, Hulliger M, Heckman CJ, Sandercock TG. Summation of forces from multiple motor units in the cat soleus muscle. J Neurophysiol 89: 738‐744, 2003.
 531. Perreault MC. Motoneurons have different membrane resistance during fictive scratching and weight support. J Neurosci 22: 8259‐8265, 2002.
 532. Perrier JF, Alaburda A, Hounsgaard J. Spinal plasticity mediated by postsynaptic L‐type Ca2 +channels. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 40: 223‐229, 2002.
 533. Perrier JF, Alaburda A, Hounsgaard J. 5‐HT1A receptors increase excitability of spinal motoneurons by inhibiting a TASK‐1‐like K+ current in the adult turtle. J Physiol 548: 485‐492, 2003.
 534. Perrier JF, Hounsgaard J. 5‐HT(2) receptors promote plateau potentials in turtle spinal motoneurons by facilitating an L‐type calcium current. J Neurophysiol 89: 954‐959, 2003.
 535. Person RS, Kudina LP. Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 32: 471‐483, 1972.
 536. Peshori KR, Collins WF, Mendell LM. EPSP amplitude modulation at the rat Ia‐alpha motoneuron synapse: Effects of GABAB receptor agonists and antagonists. J Neurophysiol 79: 181‐189, 1998.
 537. Peters EJ, Fuglevand AJ. Cessation of human motor unit discharge during sustained maximal voluntary contraction. Neurosci Lett 274: 66‐70, 1999.
 538. Peters SE. Structure and function in vertebrate skeletal‐muscle. Am Zool 29: 221‐234, 1989.
 539. Petit J, Chua M, Hunt CC. Maximum shortening speed of motor units of various types in cat lumbrical muscles. J Neurophysiol 69: 442‐448, 1993.
 540. Petit J, Filippi GM, Emonet‐Denand F, Hunt CC, Laporte Y. Changes in muscle stiffness produced by motor units of different types in peroneus longus muscle of cat. J Neurophysiol 63: 190‐197, 1990.
 541. Petit J, Giroux‐Metges MA, Gioux M. Power developed by motor units of the peroneus tertius muscle of the cat. J Neurophysiol 90: 3095‐3104, 2003.
 542. Pettersen V, Bjorkoy K, Torp H, Westgaard RH. Neck and shoulder muscle activity and thorax movement in singing and speaking tasks with variation in vocal loudness and pitch. J Voice 19: 623‐634, 2005.
 543. Pieri M, Carunchio I, Curcio L, Mercuri NB, Zona C. Increased persistent sodium current determines cortical hyperexcitability in a genetic model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp Neurol 215: 368‐379, 2009.
 544. Pinter MJ, Vanden Noven S, Muccio D, Wallace N. Axotomy‐like changes in cat motoneuron electrical properties elicited by botulinum toxin depend on the complete elimination of neuromuscular transmission. J Neurosci 11: 657‐666, 1991.
 545. Poliakov AV, Powers RK, Binder MD. Functional identification of the input‐output transforms of motoneurones in the rat and cat. J Physiol 504(Pt 2): 401‐424, 1997.
 546. Poliakov AV, Powers RK, Sawczuk A, Binder MD. Effects of background noise on the response of rat and cat motoneurones to excitatory current transients. J Physiol 495(Pt 1): 143‐157, 1996.
 547. Porter CL, Alvarez A, Jones KE, Ming Chan K. Test–retest reliability of a modified multiple point stimulation technique for motor unit number estimation. Clin Neurophysiol 119: 2287‐2290, 2008.
 548. Power KE, McCrea DA, Fedirchuk B. Intraspinally mediated state‐dependent enhancement of motoneurone excitability during fictive scratch in the adult decerebrate cat. J Physiol 588: 2839‐2857, 2010.
 549. Powers RK. A variable‐threshold motoneuron model that incorporates time‐ and voltage‐dependent potassium and calcium conductances. J Neurophysiol 70: 246‐262, 1993.
 550. Powers RK, Binder MD. Determination of afferent fibers mediating oligosynaptic group I input to cat medial gastrocnemius motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 53: 518‐529, 1985a.
 551. Powers RK, Binder MD. Distribution of oligosynaptic group I input to the cat medial gastrocnemius motoneuron pool. J Neurophysiol 53: 497‐517, 1985b.
 552. Powers RK, Binder MD. Effects of low‐frequency stimulation on the tension‐frequency relations of fast‐twitch motor units in the cat. J Neurophysiol 66: 905‐918, 1991.
 553. Powers RK, Binder MD. Input‐output functions of mammalian motoneurons. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 143: 137‐263, 2001.
 554. Powers RK, Binder MD. Persistent sodium and calcium currents in rat hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 89: 615‐624, 2003.
 555. Powers RK, Binder MD. Relationship between the time course of the afterhyperpolarization and discharge variability in cat spinal motoneurones. J Physiol 528(Pt 1): 131‐150, 2000.
 556. Powers RK, Binder MD. Summation of effective synaptic currents and firing rate modulation in cat spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 83: 483‐500, 2000.
 557. Powers RK, Binder MD. Summation of motor unit tensions in the tibialis posterior muscle of the cat under isometric and nonisometric conditions. J Neurophysiol 66: 1838‐1846, 1991.
 558. Powers RK, Dai Y, Bell BM, Percival DB, Binder MD. Contributions of the input signal and prior activation history to the discharge behaviour of rat motoneurones. J Physiol 562: 707‐724, 2005.
 559. Powers RK, Nardelli P, Cope TC. Estimation of the contribution of intrinsic currents to motoneuron firing based on paired motoneuron discharge records in the decerebrate cat. J Neurophysiol 100: 292‐303, 2008.
 560. Powers RK, Robinson FR, Konodi MA, Binder MD. Distribution of rubrospinal synaptic input to cat triceps surae motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 70: 1460‐1468, 1993.
 561. Powers RK, Türker KS. Deciphering the contribution of intrinsic and synaptic currents to the effects of transient synaptic inputs on human motor unit discharge. Clin Neurophysiol 121: 1643‐1654, 2010.
 562. Powers RK, Türker KS, Binder MD. What can be learned about motoneurone properties from studying firing patterns? Adv Exp Med Biol 508: 199‐205, 2002.
 563. Prather JF, Clark BD, Cope TC. Firing rate modulation of motoneurons activated by cutaneous and muscle receptor afferents in the decerebrate cat. J Neurophysiol 88: 1867‐1879, 2002.
 564. Prather JF, Powers RK, Cope TC. Amplification and linear summation of synaptic effects on motoneuron firing rate. J Neurophysiol 85: 43‐53, 2001.
 565. Price SR, De Marco Garcia NV, Ranscht B, Jessell TM. Regulation of motor neuron pool sorting by differential expression of type II cadherins. Cell 109: 205‐216, 2002.
 566. Pun S, Santos AF, Saxena S, Xu L, Caroni P. Selective vulnerability and pruning of phasic motoneuron axons in motoneuron disease alleviated by CNTF. Nat Neurosci 9: 408‐419, 2006.
 567. Rack PMH, Westbury DR. The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol 204: 443‐460, 1969.
 568. Rafuse VF, Gordon T. Self‐reinnervated cat medial gastrocnemius muscles. II. Analysis of the mechanisms and significance of fiber type grouping in reinnervated muscles. J Neurophysiol 75: 282‐297, 1996.
 569. Rafuse VF, Pattullo MC, Gordon T. Innervation ratio and motor unit force in large muscles: A study of chronically stimulated cat medial gastrocnemius. J Physiol 499(Pt 3): 809‐823, 1997.
 570. Rank MM, Li X, Bennett DJ, Gorassini MA. Role of endogenous release of norepinephrine in muscle spasms after chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 97: 3166‐3180, 2007.
 571. Rank MM, Murray KC, Stephens MJ, D'Amico J, Gorassini MA, Bennett DJ. Adrenergic receptors modulate motoneuron excitability, sensory synaptic transmission and muscle spasms after chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 105: 410‐422, 2011.
 572. Rekling JC. Excitatory effects of thyrotropin‐releasing hormone (TRH) in hypoglossal motoneurons. Brain Res 510: 175‐179, 1990.
 573. Rekling JC, Champagnat J, Denavit‐Saubié M. Electroresponsive properties and membrane potential trajectories of three types of inspiratory neurons in the newborn mouse brain stem in vitro. J Neurophysiol 75: 795‐810, 1996.
 574. Rekling JC, Funk GD, Bayliss DA, Dong XW, Feldman JL. Synaptic control of motoneuronal excitability. Physiol Rev 80: 767‐852, 2000.
 575. Richardson PA, Bailey EF. Tonically discharging genioglossus motor units show no evidence of rate coding with hypercapnia. J Neurophysiol 103: 1315‐1321, 2010.
 576. Richer P. Note sur la contraction du muscle quadriceps dans l'acte de donner un coup de pied. Société de Biologie 47: 204‐205, 1895.
 577. Ridall PG, Pettitt AN, Henderson RD, McCombe PA. Motor unit number estimation–a Bayesian approach. Biometrics 62: 1235‐1250, 2006.
 578. Riek S, Bawa P. Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. J Neurophysiol 68: 100‐108, 1992.
 579. Riley ZA, Baudry S, Enoka RM. Reflex inhibition in human biceps brachii decreases with practice of a fatiguing contraction. J Neurophysiol 100: 2843‐2851, 2008.
 580. Riley ZA, Maerz AH, Litsey JC, Enoka RM. Motor unit recruitment in human biceps brachii during sustained voluntary contractions. J Physiol 586: 2183‐2193, 2008.
 581. Rivera‐Arconada I, Lopez‐Garcia JA. Effects of M‐current modulators on the excitability of immature rat spinal sensory and motor neurones. Eur J Neurosci 22: 3091‐3098, 2005.
 582. Roatta S, Arendt‐Nielsen L, Farina D. Sympathetic‐induced changes in discharge rate and spike‐triggered average twitch torque of low‐threshold motor units in humans. J Physiol 586: 5561‐5574, 2008.
 583. Roatta S, Farina D. Sympathetic actions on the skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 38: 31‐35, 2010.
 584. Romaiguere P, Vedel JP, Pagni S. Comparison of fluctuations of motor unit recruitment and de‐recruitment thresholds in man. Exp Brain Res 95: 517‐522, 1993.
 585. Rose PK, Cushing S, Grande G, Bui T. Functional diversity of motoneuron dendrites: By accident or design? Arch Ital Biol 145: 175‐191, 2007.
 586. Rose PK, Vanner SJ. Differences in somatic and dendritic specific membrane resistivity of spinal motoneurons: An electrophysiological study of neck and shoulder motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 60: 149‐166, 1988.
 587. Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, Figlewicz DA, Sapp P, Hentati A, Donaldson D, Goto J, O'Regan JP, Deng HX, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 362: 59‐62, 1993.
 588. Ross KT, Nichols TR. Heterogenic feedback between hindlimb extensors in the spontaneously locomoting premammillary cat. J Neurophysiol 101: 184‐197, 2009.
 589. Rothstein JD. Current hypotheses for the underlying biology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 65(Suppl 1): S3‐9, 2009.
 590. Rothstein JD. Excitotoxicity hypothesis. Neurology 47: S19‐S25; discussion S26, 1996.
 591. Roukoz S, Naccache N, Sleilaty G. The role of the musculocutaneous and radial nerves in elbow flexion and forearm supination: A biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Eur 33: 201‐204, 2008.
 592. Routal RV, Pal GP. A study of motoneuron groups and motor columns of the human spinal cord. J Anat 195(Pt 2): 211‐224, 1999.
 593. Rubinstein S, Kamen G. Decreases in motor unit firing rate during sustained maximal‐effort contractions in young and older adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 15: 536‐543, 2005.
 594. Rudomin P. Selectivity of the central control of sensory information in the mammalian spinal cord. Adv Exp Med Biol 508: 157‐170, 2002.
 595. Rudroff T, Jordan K, Enoka JA, Matthews SD, Baudry S, Enoka RM. Discharge of biceps brachii motor units is modulated by load compliance and forearm posture. Exp Brain Res 202: 111‐120, 2010.
 596. Ruff RL. Neurophysiology of the neuromuscular junction: Overview. Ann N Y Acad Sci U S A 998: 1‐10, 2003.
 597. Ruigrok TJ, Crowe A. The organization of motoneurons in the turtle lumbar spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 228: 24‐37, 1984.
 598. Ryan JM, Cushman J, Jordan B, Samuels A, Frazer H, Baier C. Topographic position of forelimb motoneuron pools is conserved in vertebrate evolution. Brain Behav Evol 51: 90‐99, 1998.
 599. Saboisky JP, Butler JE, Fogel RB, Taylor JL, Trinder JA, White DP, Gandevia SC. Tonic and phasic respiratory drives to human genioglossus motoneurons during breathing. J Neurophysiol 95: 2213‐2221, 2006.
 600. Safronov BV, Vogel W. Single voltage‐activated Na+ and K+ channels in the somata of rat motoneurones. J Physiol 487: 91‐106, 1995.
 601. Sah P, McLachlan EM. Potassium currents contributing to action potential repolarization and the afterhyperpolarization in rat vagal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 68: 1834‐1841, 1992.
 602. Sandercock TG. Nonlinear summation of force in cat soleus muscle results primarily from stretch of the common‐elastic elements. J Appl Physiol 89: 2206‐2214, 2000.
 603. Sandercock TG. Nonlinear summation of force in cat tibialis anterior: A muscle with intrafascicularly terminating fibers. J Appl Physiol 94: 1955‐1963, 2003.
 604. Sandercock TG. Summation of motor unit force in passive and active muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 33: 76‐83, 2005.
 605. Sandercock TG, Heckman CJ. Force from cat soleus muscle during imposed locomotor‐like movements: Experimental data versus hill‐type model predictions. J Neurophysiol 77: 1538‐1552, 1997.
 606. Sandercock TG, Maas H. Force summation between muscles: Are muscles independent actuators? Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 184‐190, 2009.
 607. Santello M, Fuglevand AJ. Role of across‐muscle motor unit synchrony for the coordination of forces. Exp Brain Res 159: 501‐508, 2004.
 608. Sasaki M. Membrane properties of external urethral and external anal sphincter motoneurones in the cat. J Physiol 440: 345‐366, 1991.
 609. Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Molecular diversity of myofibrillar proteins: Gene regulation and functional significance. Physiol Rev 76: 371‐423, 1996.
 610. Schieber MH, Rivlis G. A spectrum from pure post‐spike effects to synchrony effects in spike‐triggered averages of electromyographic activity during skilled finger movements. J Neurophysiol 94: 3325‐3341, 2005.
 611. Schlue WR, Richter DW, Mauritz KH, Nacimiento AC. Accomodation and Na‐inactivation in cat spinal motor neurons. Pflugers Arch 332(Suppl 332): R383, 1972.
 612. Schmidt BJ, Jordan LM. The role of serotonin in reflex modulation and locomotor rhythm production in the mammalian spinal cord. Brain Res Bull 53: 689‐710, 2000.
 613. Schmied A, Pagni S, Sturm H, Vedel JP. Selective enhancement of motoneurone short‐term synchrony during an attention‐demanding task. Exp Brain Res 133: 377‐390, 2000.
 614. Schmied A, Vedel JP, Pagni S. Human spinal lateralization assessed from motoneurone synchronization: Dependence on handedness and motor unit type. J Physiol 480(Pt 2): 369‐387, 1994.
 615. Schwindt P, Crill WE. A persistent negative resistance in cat lumbar motoneurons. Brain Res 120: 173‐178, 1977.
 616. Schwindt PC, Crill WE. Properties of a persistent inward current in normal and TEA‐injected motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 43: 1700‐1724, 1980a.
 617. Schwindt PC, Crill WE. Role of a persistent inward current in motoneuron bursting during spinal seizures. J Neurophysiol 43: 1296‐1318, 1980b.
 618. Schwindt PC, Crill WE. Differential effects of TEA and cations on outward ionic currents of cat motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 46: 1‐16, 1981a.
 619. Schwindt PC, Crill WE. Negative slope conductance at large depolarizations in cat spinal motoneurons. Brain Res 207: 471‐475, 1981b.
 620. Scutter SD, Türker KS. Recruitment stability in masseter motor units during isometric voluntary contractions. Muscle Nerve 21: 1290‐1298, 1998.
 621. Sears TA, Stagg D. Short‐term synchronization of intercostal motoneurone activity. J Physiol 263: 357‐381, 1976.
 622. Seburn KL, Cope TC. Short‐term afferent axotomy increases both strength and depression at Ia‐motoneuron synapses in rat. J Neurosci 18: 1142‐1147, 1998.
 623. Semmler JG. Motor unit synchronization and neuromuscular performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30: 8‐14, 2002.
 624. Semmler JG, Kornatz KW, Dinenno DV, Zhou S, Enoka RM. Motor unit synchronisation is enhanced during slow lengthening contractions of a hand muscle. J Physiol 545: 681‐695, 2002.
 625. Semmler JG, Kornatz KW, Meyer FG, Enoka RM. Diminished task‐related adjustments of common inputs to hand muscle motor neurons in older adults. Exp Brain Res 172: 507‐518, 2006.
 626. Semmler JG, Nordstrom MA. Motor unit discharge and force tremor in skill‐ and strength‐trained individuals. Exp Brain Res 119: 27‐38, 1998.
 627. Semmler JG, Nordstrom MA, Wallace CJ. Relationship between motor unit short‐term synchronization and common drive in human first dorsal interosseous muscle. Brain Res 767: 314‐320, 1997.
 628. Semmler JG, Steege JW, Kornatz KW, Enoka RM. Motor‐unit synchronization is not responsible for larger motor‐unit forces in old adults. J Neurophysiol 84: 358‐366, 2000.
 629. Seyffarth H. The behaviour of motor units in voluntary contractions. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps‐Akademi I Oslo. I. Mat Naturv Klasse 4: 1‐63, 1940.
 630. Shapiro NP, Lee RH. Synaptic amplification versus bistability in motoneuron dendritic processing: A top‐down modeling approach. J Neurophysiol 97: 3948‐3960, 2007.
 631. Sharrard WJ. The distribution of the permanent paralysis in the lower limb in poliomyelitis; a clinical and pathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 37‐B: 540‐558, 1955.
 632. Sherrington CS. Remarks on some aspects of reflex inhibition. Proc R Soc Lond B97: 519‐545, 1925.
 633. Shinohara M, Keenan KG, Enoka RM. Contralateral activity in a homologous hand muscle during voluntary contractions is greater in old adults. J Appl Physiol 94: 966‐974, 2003.
 634. Siddique T, Deng HX. Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet 5: 1465‐1470, 1996.
 635. Simon M, Perrier JF, Hounsgaard J. Subcellular distribution of L‐type Ca2+ channels responsible for plateau potentials in motoneurons from the lumbar spinal cord of the turtle. Eur J Neurosci 18: 258‐266, 2003.
 636. Smith HC, Davey NJ, Savic G, Maskill DW, Ellaway PH, Frankel HL. Motor unit discharge characteristics during voluntary contraction in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Exp Physiol 84: 1151‐1160, 1999.
 637. Smith MR, Smith RD, Plummer NW, Meisler MH, Goldin AL. Functional analysis of the mouse Scn8a sodium channel. J Neurosci 18: 6093‐6102, 1998.
 638. Smith WS, Fetz EE. Effects of synchrony between primate corticomotoneuronal cells on post‐spike facilitation of muscles and motor units. Neurosci Lett 96: 76‐81, 1989.
 639. Snijders T, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. The impact of sarcopenia and exercise training on skeletal muscle satellite cells. Ageing Res Rev 8: 328‐338, 2009.
 640. Søgaard K, Christensen H, Jensen BR, Finsen L, Sjogaard G. Motor control and kinetics during low level concentric and eccentric contractions in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101: 453‐460, 1996.
 641. Sokoloff AJ, Siegel SG, Cope TC. Recruitment order among motoneurons from different motor nuclei. J Neurophysiol 81: 2485‐2492, 1999.
 642. Spalloni A, Albo F, Ferrari F, Mercuri N, Bernardi G, Zona C, Longone P. Cu/Zn‐superoxide dismutase (GLY93–>ALA) mutation alters AMPA receptor subunit expression and function and potentiates kainate‐mediated toxicity in motor neurons in culture. Neurobiol Dis 15: 340‐350, 2004.
 643. Stålberg E, Chu J, Bril V, Nandedkar S, Stalberg S, Ericsson M. Automatic analysis of the EMG interference pattern. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 56: 672‐681, 1983.
 644. Stein RB, French AS, Mannard A, Yemm R. New methods for analyzing motor function in man and animals. Brain Res 40: 187‐192, 1972.
 645. Stein RB, Gossen ER, Jones KE. Neuronal variability: Noise or part of the signal? Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 389‐397, 2005.
 646. Stein RB, Yang JF. Methods for estimating the number of motor units in human muscles. Ann Neurol 28: 487‐495, 1990.
 647. Stephens JA, Reinking RM, Stuart DG. The motor units of cat medial gastrocnemius: Electrical and mechanical properties as a function of muscle length. J Morphol 146: 495‐512, 1975.
 648. Stephenson JL, Maluf KS. Discharge behaviors of trapezius motor units during exposure to low and high levels of acute psychosocial stress. J Clin Neurophysiol 27: 52‐61, 2010.
 649. Stephenson JL, Maluf KS. Dependence of the paired motor unit analysis on motor unit discharge characteristics in the human tibialis anterior muscle. J Neurosci Methods 198: 84‐92, 2011.
 650. Stocker M, Pedarzani P. Differential distribution of three Ca(2+)‐activated K(+) channel subunits, SK1, SK2, and SK3, in the adult rat central nervous system. Mol Cell Neurosci 15: 476‐493, 2000.
 651. Stotz PJ, Bawa P. Motor unit recruitment during lengthening contractions of human wrist flexors. Muscle Nerve 24: 1535‐1541, 2001.
 652. Street SF. Lateral transmission of tension in frog myofibers: A myofibrillar network and transverse cytoskeletal connections are possible transmitters. J Cell Physiol 114: 346‐364, 1983.
 653. Stuart DG, Brownstone RM. The beginning of intracellular recording in spinal neurons: Facts, reflections, and speculations. Brain Res 1409: 62‐92, 2011.
 654. Stuart DG, Clarac F, Barbara JG, Brownstone RM, Duchateau J, Enoka RM. Paths of discovery in motoneuron neurobiology. Brain Res 1409: 1‐2, 2011.
 655. Sukiasyan N, Hultborn H, Zhang M. Distribution of calcium channel Ca(V)1.3 immunoreactivity in the rat spinal cord and brain stem. Neuroscience 159: 217‐235, 2009.
 656. Suzuki S, Hayami A, Suzuki M, Watanabe S, Hutton RS. Reductions in recruitment force thresholds in human single motor units by successive voluntary contractions. Exp Brain Res 82: 227‐230, 1990.
 657. Svirskis G, Hounsgaard J. Transmitter regulation of plateau properties in turtle motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 79: 45‐50, 1998.
 658. Takahashi T. Inward rectification in neonatal rat spinal motoneurones. J Physiol 423: 47‐62, 1990.
 659. Takahashi T, Berger AJ. Direct excitation of rat spinal motoneurones by serotonin. J Physiol 423: 63‐76, 1990.
 660. Tanji J, Kato M. Firing rate of individual motor units in voluntary contraction of abductor digiti minimi muscle in man. Exp Neurol 40: 771‐783, 1973.
 661. Tax AA, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CC, van den Tempel CM. Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res 76: 55‐63, 1989.
 662. Tax AAM, Vandergon JJD, Erkelens CJ. Differences in coordination of elbow flexor muscles in force tasks and in movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 81: 567‐572, 1990.
 663. Tax AAM, Vandergon JJD, Gielen CCAM, Kleyne M. Differences in central control of M‐biceps‐brachii in movement tasks and force tasks. Exp Brain Res 79: 138‐142, 1990.
 664. Taylor AM, Christou EA, Enoka RM. Multiple features of motor‐unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 90: 1350‐1361, 2003.
 665. Taylor AM, Enoka RM. Optimization of input patterns and neuronal properties to evoke motor neuron synchronization. J Comput Neurosci 16: 139‐157, 2004a.
 666. Taylor AM, Enoka RM. Quantification of the factors that influence discharge correlation in model motor neurons. J Neurophysiol 91: 796‐814, 2004b.
 667. Taylor AM, Steege JW, Enoka RM. Motor‐unit synchronization alters spike‐triggered average force in simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 88: 265‐276, 2002.
 668. ter Haar Romeny BM, van der Gon JJ, Gielen CC. Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks. Exp Neurol 85: 631‐650, 1984.
 669. Theeuwen M, Gielen CC, Miller LE, Doorenbosch C. The relation between the direction dependence of electromyographic amplitude and motor unit recruitment thresholds during isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res 98: 488‐500, 1994.
 670. Thomas CK, Bigland‐Ritchie B, Johansson RS. Force‐frequency relationships of human thenar motor units. J Neurophysiol 65: 1509‐1516, 1991.
 671. Thomas CK, Bigland‐Ritchie B, Westling G, Johansson RS. A comparison of human thenar motor‐unit properties studied by intraneural motor‐axon stimulation and spike‐triggered averaging. J Neurophysiol 64: 1347‐1351, 1990.
 672. Thomas CK, del Valle A. The role of motor unit rate modulation versus recruitment in repeated submaximal voluntary contractions performed by control and spinal cord injured subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11: 217‐229, 2001.
 673. Thomas CK, Johansson RS, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Attempts to physiologically classify human thenar motor units. J Neurophysiol 65: 1501‐1508, 1991.
 674. Thomas CK, Johansson RS, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Pattern of pulses that maximize force output from single human thenar motor units. J Neurophysiol 82: 3188‐3195, 1999.
 675. Thomas CK, Johansson RS, Westling G, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Twitch properties of human thenar motor units measured in response to intraneural motor‐axon stimulation. J Neurophysiol 64: 1339‐1346, 1990.
 676. Thomas CK, Ross BH, Calancie B. Human motor‐unit recruitment during isometric contractions and repeated dynamic movements. J Neurophysiol 57: 311‐324, 1987.
 677. Thomas CK, Ross BH, Stein RB. Motor‐unit recruitment in human 1st dorsal interosseous muscle for static contractions in 3 different directions. J Neurophysiol 55: 1017‐1029, 1986.
 678. Thomas CK, Ross BH, Stein RB. Motor‐unit recruitment in human first dorsal interosseous muscle for static contractions in three different directions. J Neurophysiol 55: 1017‐1029, 1986.
 679. Tomlinson BE, Irving D. The numbers of limb motor neurons in the human lumbosacral cord throughout life. J Neurol Sci 34: 213‐219, 1977.
 680. Torre M. Nombre et dimensions des unités motrices dans les muscles extrinsêques de l’œil et, en général, dans les muscles squélettiques reliés à des organs de sens. Arch Suisses Neurol Psychiatry 72: 362‐376, 1953.
 681. Tötösy de Zepetnek JE, Zung HV, Erdebil S, Gordon T. Innervation ratio is an important determinant of force in normal and reinnervated rat tibialis anterior muscles. J Neurophysiol 67: 1385‐1403, 1992.
 682. Troiani D, Filippi GM, Bassi FA. Nonlinear tension summation of different combinations of motor units in the anesthetized cat peroneus longus muscle. J Neurophysiol 81: 771‐780, 1999.
 683. Trotter JA. Interfiber tension transmission in series‐fibered muscles of the cat hindlimb. J Morphol 206: 351‐361, 1990.
 684. Türker KS, Powers RK. Effects of common excitatory and inhibitory inputs on motoneuron synchronization. J Neurophysiol 86: 2807‐2822, 2001.
 685. Türker KS, Powers RK. Estimation of postsynaptic potentials in rat hypoglossal motoneurones: Insights for human work. J Physiol 551: 419‐431, 2003.
 686. Türker KS, Schmied A, Cheng HB. Correlated changes in the firing rate of human motor units during voluntary contraction. Exp Brain Res 111: 455‐464, 1996.
 687. Turkin VV, O'Neill D, Jung R, Iarkov A, Hamm TM. Characteristics and organization of discharge properties in rat hindlimb motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 104: 1549‐1565, 2010.
 688. Udina E, D'Amico J, Bergquist AJ, Gorassini MA. Amphetamine increases persistent inward currents in human motoneurons estimated from paired motor‐unit activity. J Neurophysiol 103: 1295‐1303, 2010.
 689. Ulfhake B, Kellerth JO. A quantitative light microscopic study of the dendrites of cat spinal alpha‐motoneurons after intracellular staining with horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol 202: 571‐583, 1981.
 690. Umemiya M, Berger AJ. Properties and function of low‐ and high‐voltage‐activated Ca2+ channels in hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurosci 14: 5652‐5660, 1994.
 691. van Antwerp KW, Burkholder TJ, Ting LH. Inter‐joint coupling effects on muscle contributions to endpoint force and acceleration in a musculoskeletal model of the cat hindlimb. J Biomech 40: 3570‐3579, 2007.
 692. van Bolhuis BM, Medendorp WP, Gielen CC. Motor unit firing behavior in human arm flexor muscles during sinusoidal isometric contractions and movements. Exp Brain Res 117: 120‐130, 1997.
 693. Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol 513(Pt 1): 295‐305, 1998.
 694. Van Cutsem M, Feiereisen P, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Mechanical properties and behaviour of motor units in the tibialis anterior during voluntary contractions. Can J Appl Physiol 22: 585‐597, 1997.
 695. van Groeningen CJ, Nijhof EJ, Vermeule FM, Erkelens CJ. Relation between torque history, firing frequency, decruitment levels and force balance in two flexors of the elbow. Exp Brain Res 129: 592‐604, 1999.
 696. van Zundert B, Peuscher MH, Hynynen M, Chen A, Neve RL, Brown RH, Jr., Constantine‐Paton M, Bellingham MC. Neonatal neuronal circuitry shows hyperexcitable disturbance in a mouse model of the adult‐onset neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurosci 28: 10864‐10874, 2008.
 697. van Zuylen EJ, Gielen CC, Denier van der Gon JJ. Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. J Neurophysiol 60: 1523‐1548, 1988.
 698. Vanderhorst VG, Holstege G. Organization of lumbosacral motoneuronal cell groups innervating hindlimb, pelvic floor, and axial muscles in the cat. J Comp Neurol 382: 46‐76, 1997.
 699. Viana F, Bayliss DA, Berger AJ. Multiple potassium conductances and their role in action potential repolarization and repetitive firing behavior of neonatal rat hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 69: 2150‐2163, 1993a.
 700. Viana F, Bayliss DA, Berger AJ. Multiple potassium conductances and their role in action potential repolarization and repetitive firing behavior of neonatal rat hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 69: 2150‐2163, 1993b.
 701. Vieira TM, Loram ID, Muceli S, Merletti R, Farina D. Postural activation of the human medial gastrocnemius muscle: Are the muscle units spatially localised? J Physiol 589: 431‐443, 2011.
 702. von Tscharner V, Nigg BM. Point: Spectral properties of the surface Emg can characterize motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle fiber type. J Appl Physiol 105: 1671‐1673, 2008.
 703. Wada T, Hasegawa Y, Ono H. Characterization of alpha1‐adrenoceptor subtypes in facilitation of rat spinal motoneuron activity. Eur J Pharmacol 340: 45‐52, 1997.
 704. Walmsley B, Proske U. Comparison of stiffness of soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscles in cats. J Neurophysiol 46: 250‐259, 1981.
 705. Wang HS, Pan Z, Shi W, Brown BS, Wymore RS, Cohen IS, Dixon JE, McKinnon D. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: Molecular correlates of the M‐channel. Science 282: 1890‐1893, 1998.
 706. Wang LC, Kernell D. Proximo‐distal organization and fibre type regionalization in rat hindlimb muscles. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 21: 587‐598, 2000.
 707. Wang LC, Kernell D. Quantification of fibre type regionalisation: An analysis of lower hindlimb muscles in the rat. J Anat 198: 295‐308, 2001.
 708. Wang LC, Kernell D. Fibre type regionalisation in lower hindlimb muscles of rabbit, rat and mouse: A comparative study. J Anat 199: 631‐643, 2001.
 709. Weijs WA, Jüch PJ, Kwa SH, Korfage JA. Motor unit territories and fiber types in rabbit masseter muscle. J Dent Res 72: 1491‐1498, 1993.
 710. Westad C, Mork PJ, Westgaard RH. Firing patterns of low‐threshold trapezius motor units in feedback‐controlled contractions and vocational motor activities. Exp Brain Res 158: 465‐473, 2004.
 711. Westad C, Westgaard RH. The influence of contraction amplitude and firing history on spike‐triggered averaged trapezius motor unit potentials. J Physiol 562: 965‐975, 2005.
 712. Westad C, Westgaard RH, De Luca CJ. Motor unit recruitment and derecruitment induced by brief increase in contraction amplitude of the human trapezius muscle. J Physiol 552: 645‐656, 2003.
 713. Westcott SL, Powers RK, Robinson FR, Binder MD. Distribution of vestibulospinal synaptic input to cat triceps surae motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 107: 1‐8, 1995.
 714. Westenbroek RE, Merrick DK, Catterall WA. Differential subcellular localization of the RI and RII Na+ channel subtypes in central neurons. Neuron 3: 695‐704, 1989.
 715. Westgaard RH, Bonato P, Westad C. Respiratory and stress‐induced activation of low‐threshold motor units in the human trapezius muscle. Exp Brain Res 175: 689‐701, 2006.
 716. Westgaard RH, De Luca CJ. Motor unit substitution in long‐duration contractions of the human trapezius muscle. J Neurophysiol 82: 501‐504, 1999.
 717. Westgaard RH, De Luca CJ. Motor control of low‐threshold motor units in the human trapezius muscle. J Neurophysiol 85: 1777‐1781, 2001.
 718. Westling G, Johansson RS, Thomas CK, Bigland‐Ritchie B. Measurement of contractile and electrical properties of single human thenar motor units in response to intraneural motor‐axon stimulation. J Neurophysiol 64: 1331‐1338, 1990.
 719. White SR, Fung SJ. Serotonin depolarizes cat spinal motoneurons in situ and decreases motoneuron afterhyperpolarizing potentials. Brain Res 502: 205‐213, 1989.
 720. White SR, Fung SJ, Barnes CD. Norepinephrine effects on spinal motoneurons. Prog Brain Res 88: 343‐350, 1991.
 721. Wienecke J, Zhang M, Hultborn H. A prolongation of the postspike afterhyperpolarization following spike trains can partly explain the lower firing rates at derecruitment than those at recruitment. J Neurophysiol 102: 3698‐3710, 2009.
 722. Windhorst U, Hamm TM, Stuart DG. On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning. Behav Brain Sci 12: 629‐645, 1989.
 723. Winges SA, Kornatz KW, Santello M. Common input to motor units of intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles during two‐digit object hold. J Neurophysiol 99: 1119‐1126, 2008.
 724. Wood SJ, Slater CR. Safety factor at the neuromuscular junction. Prog Neurobiol 64: 393‐429, 2001.
 725. Woodbury JW, Patton HD. Electrical activity of single spinal cord elements. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 17: 185‐188, 1952.
 726. Wu SY, Wang MY, Dun NJ. Serotonin via presynaptic 5‐HT1 receptors attenuates synaptic transmission to immature rat motoneurons in vitro. Brain Res 554: 111‐121, 1991.
 727. Yao W, Fuglevand RJ, Enoka RM. Motor‐unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 83: 441‐452, 2000.
 728. Yasuda K, Robinson DM, Selvaratnam SR, Walsh CW, McMorland AJ, Funk GD. Modulation of hypoglossal motoneuron excitability by NK1 receptor activation in neonatal mice in vitro. J Physiol 534: 447‐464, 2001.
 729. Young M, Paul A, Rodda J, Duxson M, Sheard P. Examination of intrafascicular muscle fiber terminations: Implications for tension delivery in series‐fibered muscles. J Morphol 245: 130‐145, 2000.
 730. Zagoraiou L, Akay T, Martin JF, Brownstone RM, Jessell TM, Miles GB. A cluster of cholinergic premotor interneurons modulates mouse locomotor activity. Neuron 64: 645‐662, 2009.
 731. Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: Properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17: 359‐411, 1989.
 732. Zajac FE, Faden JS. Relationship among recruitment order, axonal conduction velocity, and muscle‐unit properties of type‐identified motor units in cat plantaris muscle. J Neurophysiol 53: 1303‐1322, 1985.
 733. Zeng J, Powers RK, Newkirk G, Yonkers M, Binder MD. Contribution of persistent sodium currents to spike‐frequency adaptation in rat hypoglossal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 93: 1035‐1041, 2005.
 734. Zengel JE, Reid SA, Sypert GW, Munson JB. Membrane electrical properties and prediction of motor‐unit type of medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 53: 1323‐1344, 1985.
 735. Zennaro D, Laubli T, Krebs D, Klipstein A, Krueger H. Continuous, intermitted and sporadic motor unit activity in the trapezius muscle during prolonged computer work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13: 113‐124, 2003.
 736. Zhang L, Krnjević K. Apamin depresses selectively the after‐hyperpolarization of cat spinal motoneurons. Neurosci Lett 74: 58‐62, 1987.
 737. Zhang L, Krnjević K. Intracellular injection of Ca2+ chelator does not affect spike repolarization of cat spinal motoneurons. Brain Res 462: 174‐180, 1988.
 738. Zhang M, Moller M, Broman J, Sukiasyan N, Wienecke J, Hultborn H. Expression of calcium channel CaV1.3 in cat spinal cord: Light and electron microscopic immunohistochemical study. J Comp Neurol 507: 1109‐1127, 2008.
 739. Zhang M, Sukiasyan N, Moller M, Bezprozvanny I, Zhang H, Wienecke J, Hultborn H. Localization of L‐type calcium channel Ca(V)1.3 in cat lumbar spinal cord–with emphasis on motoneurons. Neurosci Lett 407: 42‐47, 2006.
 740. Zhong G, Masino MA, Harris‐Warrick RM. Persistent sodium currents participate in fictive locomotion generation in neonatal mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 27: 4507‐4518, 2007.
 741. Zhu H, Clemens S, Sawchuk M, Hochman S. Expression and distribution of all dopamine receptor subtypes (D(1)‐D(5)) in the mouse lumbar spinal cord: A real‐time polymerase chain reaction and non‐autoradiographic in situ hybridization study. Neuroscience 149: 885‐897, 2007.
 742. Zijdewind I, Thomas CK. Spontaneous motor unit behavior in human thenar muscles after spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 24: 952‐962, 2001.
 743. Zijdewind I, Thomas CK. Motor unit firing during and after voluntary contractions of human thenar muscles weakened by spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 89: 2065‐2071, 2003.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

C.J. Heckman, Roger M. Enoka. Motor Unit. Compr Physiol 2012, 2: 2629-2682. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100087